Clicky

Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung SL620

Portability
91
Imaging
43
Features
39
Overall
41
Ricoh WG-70 front
 
Samsung SL620 front
Portability
94
Imaging
35
Features
13
Overall
26

Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung SL620 Key Specs

Ricoh WG-70
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Digital Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
  • Revealed February 2020
  • Newer Model is Ricoh WG-80
Samsung SL620
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-175mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
  • 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
  • Revealed February 2009
  • Alternative Name is PL65
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung SL620 Overview

Here, we will be contrasting the Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung SL620, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the WG-70 (16MP) and SL620 (12MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The WG-70 was introduced 11 years after the SL620 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-70 being a Compact camera and the Samsung SL620 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before delving right into a thorough comparison, here is a brief summation of how the WG-70 matches up against the SL620 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Samsung SL620

 WG-70 SL620 
RevealedFebruary 2020February 2009More modern by 134 months
Focus manually Very accurate focus

Reasons to pick Samsung SL620 over the Ricoh WG-70

 SL620 WG-70 

Common features in the Ricoh WG-70 and Samsung SL620

 WG-70 SL620 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size2.7"2.7"Same screen sizing
Screen resolution230k230kEqual screen resolution
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch friendly screen No Touch friendly screen

Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung SL620 Physical Comparison

For those who are looking to carry around your camera regularly, you will have to consider its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-70 enjoys outside measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL620 has specifications of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).

Analyze the Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung SL620 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have at that time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the WG-70 vs the SL620.

Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung SL620 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-70 and SL620 is 91 and 94 respectively.

Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung SL620 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung SL620 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is hard to envision the gap between sensor sizes just by reading a spec sheet. The image underneath will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-70 and SL620.

As you can see, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Ricoh WG-70 to offer you extra detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The newer WG-70 will have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.

Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung SL620 sensor size comparison

Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung SL620 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung SL620 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh WG-70 as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung SL620 as a Portrait photography camera
42
focusing manually
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
provides face detection focus
no manual exposure
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
26
offers face detection focus
focusing manually not possible
manual mode not possible
can't use external flash
MP count low (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Ricoh WG-70 Street photography details
Samsung SL620 Street photography details
62
has image stabilization (Digital)
environment proofing
no moving screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
47
no moving screen
no image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
more heavy than others (168g)
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Ricoh WG-70 Sports photography highlights
Samsung SL620 Sports photography highlights
50
has image stabilization (Digital)
good megapixels (16MP)
provides tracking autofocus
environment proofing
no shutter priority
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
17
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
MP count low (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Ricoh WG-70
Travel photography with Samsung SL620
71
environment proofing
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
fairly wide (28mm)
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
50
flash built-in
no Timelapse function
more heavy than others (168 grams)
MP count low (12MP)
display is not selfie friendly
wide angle not the best (35mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh WG-70 as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung SL620 as a Landscape photography camera
49
focusing manually
fairly wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Digital)
good megapixels (16MP)
environment proofing
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
small screen (2.7 inches)
no manual exposure
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
23
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
small screen (2.7")
manual mode not possible
no image stabilization
MP count low (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
no Timelapse function
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh WG-70 Vlogging details
Samsung SL620 Vlogging details
33
fairly wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Digital)
provides face detection focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
display is not selfie friendly
doesn't have external mic jack
24
offers face detection focus
wide angle not the best (35mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
display is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 pxls)
no external microphone support
more heavy than others (168g)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung SL620 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh WG-70 and Samsung SL620
 Ricoh WG-70Samsung SL620
General Information
Brand Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh WG-70 Samsung SL620
Also called as - PL65
Class Waterproof Ultracompact
Revealed 2020-02-04 2009-02-17
Physical type Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 12MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 -
Max resolution 4608 x 3456 4000 x 3000
Max native ISO 6400 1600
Min native ISO 125 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points 9 -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-140mm (5.0x) 35-175mm (5.0x)
Maximum aperture f/3.5-5.5 f/2.8-5.7
Macro focusing range 1cm 5cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.9
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.7 inch 2.7 inch
Resolution of display 230k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 secs 8 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) 4.60 m
Flash options On, off Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Yes (Wireless) None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 193g (0.43 lb) 168g (0.37 lb)
Physical dimensions 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 300 photographs -
Battery style Battery Pack -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) Yes
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots One One
Price at release $280 $200