Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX210
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
90 Imaging
62 Features
57 Overall
60
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Revealed September 2014
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 222g - 117 x 63 x 37mm
- Revealed August 2012
- Earlier Model is Samsung NX200
- Renewed by Samsung NX300
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX210 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung NX210, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a substantial gap between the resolutions of the WG-M1 (14MP) and NX210 (20MP) and the WG-M1 (1/2.3") and NX210 (APS-C) enjoy different sensor measurements.
Photography GlossaryThe WG-M1 was introduced 2 years later than the NX210 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX210 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise overview of how the WG-M1 scores against the NX210 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX210 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-M1 & Samsung NX210. The whole galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery & Samsung NX210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Samsung NX210
| WG-M1 | NX210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2014 |  | August 2012 | More recent by 26 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX210 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| NX210 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.5") |
| Display resolution | 614k |  | 115k | Crisper display (+499k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung NX210
| WG-M1 | NX210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lack of Touch display |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX210 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera, you should factor in its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-M1 features exterior dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) and the Samsung NX210 has specifications of 117mm x 63mm x 37mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.5") with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung NX210 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have during that time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the WG-M1 compared to the NX210.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-M1 and NX210 is 91 and 90 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX210 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to visualize the gap between sensor measurements only by going over specifications. The visual below will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-M1 and NX210.
Plainly, each of the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The WG-M1 having a tinier sensor is going to make shooting bokeh more difficult and the Samsung NX210 will offer extra detail using its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics much more aggressively. The younger WG-M1 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX210 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX210 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung NX210 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung NX210 |
| Type | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2014-09-12 | 2012-08-14 |
| Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 20MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Highest native ISO | 800 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 15 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
| Lens focal range | (1×) | - |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8 | - |
| Available lenses | - | 32 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 1.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 115 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | - | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | - | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 10.0fps | 8.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | - | 1/180s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1920 x 810 (24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 190 gr (0.42 lbs) | 222 gr (0.49 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 117 x 63 x 37mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 71 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.5 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 719 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 shots | 330 shots |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | DB-65 | BC1030 |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | microSD/microSDHC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $2,000 | $625 |