Olympus E-3 vs Olympus 5010
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1838c/1838cdf26d1a273bfc0958872d51c3945bf812d1" alt="Olympus E-3 front Olympus E-3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e9e45/e9e457397531c200c69a31ad07004097ef5a77b7" alt="Olympus Stylus 5010 front Olympus Stylus 5010 front"
96 Imaging
36 Features
27 Overall
32
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus 5010 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Revealed February 2008
- Replaced the Olympus E-1
- Successor is Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 126g - 95 x 56 x 20mm
- Launched January 2010
- Alternate Name is mju 5010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus 5010 Overview
The following is a in-depth comparison of the Olympus E-3 and Olympus 5010, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Ultracompact and both of them are built by Olympus. There exists a large gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-3 (10MP) and 5010 (14MP) and the E-3 (Four Thirds) and 5010 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-3 was launched 22 months earlier than the 5010 making the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus 5010 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting through a thorough comparison, below is a quick summation of how the E-3 grades versus the 5010 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus 5010 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-3 & Olympus Stylus 5010. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-3 Gallery & Olympus 5010 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Olympus 5010
E-3 | 5010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus 5010 over the Olympus E-3
5010 | E-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2010 | ![]() | February 2008 | Newer by 22 months |
Display sizing | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Olympus 5010
E-3 | 5010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Exact same display resolution |
Touch display | ![]() | Absent Touch display |
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus 5010 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera regularly, you have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-3 enjoys physical measurements of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") along with a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) while the Olympus 5010 has specifications of 95mm x 56mm x 20mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 126 grams (0.28 lbs).
See the Olympus E-3 and Olympus 5010 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the E-3 and the 5010.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f5aeb/f5aebcc49b88d5ec64add4dee989e52398aa5f43" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Olympus 5010 size comparison Olympus E-3 vs Olympus 5010 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-3 and 5010 is 56 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0439/b0439bb45fdf09932d6bfd5809dbfd278b5dc48d" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Olympus 5010 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-3 vs Olympus 5010 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus 5010 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be difficult to visualise the difference in sensor dimensions merely by researching technical specs. The image here will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-3 and 5010.
As you have seen, both of these cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-3 because of its larger sensor will make getting shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus 5010 will provide you with more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics a little more aggressively. The more aged E-3 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e68c9/e68c9a40b23da773b50290e2abf238c3bb78a10f" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Olympus 5010 sensor size comparison Olympus E-3 vs Olympus 5010 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus 5010 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cb5a1/cb5a1ab4fbfc867c37726d09ed1dfb3652a6865e" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Olympus 5010 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-3 vs Olympus 5010 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus 5010 Specifications
Olympus E-3 | Olympus Stylus 5010 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-3 | Olympus Stylus 5010 |
Also called as | - | mju 5010 |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2008-02-20 | 2010-01-07 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 7cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m | 4.70 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 890g (1.96 lb) | 126g (0.28 lb) |
Dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 95 x 56 x 20mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 571 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SC/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $670 | $150 |