Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung SL30
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
95 Imaging
33 Features
14 Overall
25
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung SL30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Released September 2014
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 140g - 94 x 61 x 23mm
- Revealed February 2009
- Alternative Name is ES15
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung SL30 Overview
Here is a extensive overview of the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung SL30, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a crucial gap among the image resolutions of the WG-M1 (14MP) and SL30 (10MP) but both cameras have the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe WG-M1 was launched 5 years later than the SL30 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short view of how the WG-M1 scores vs the SL30 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung SL30 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung SL30. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery and Samsung SL30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Samsung SL30
| WG-M1 | SL30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2014 |  | February 2009 | Fresher by 68 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL30 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| SL30 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 2.5" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Crisper screen (+115k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung SL30
| WG-M1 | SL30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung SL30 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera, you will want to factor its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-M1 features external measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL30 has specifications of 94mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs).
Check the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung SL30 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you select at that time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the WG-M1 vs the SL30.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-M1 and SL30 is 91 and 95 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung SL30 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's hard to visualize the contrast in sensor sizing purely by checking out a spec sheet. The visual underneath will give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-M1 and SL30.
As you can see, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Ricoh WG-M1 to show extra detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The fresher WG-M1 should have an advantage in sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung SL30 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung SL30 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung SL30 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung SL30 |
| Alternate name | - | ES15 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2014-09-12 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 800 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | (1×) | 38-114mm (3.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 1.5" | 2.5" |
| Display resolution | 115 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | - | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | - | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.60 m |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 190 gr (0.42 lb) | 140 gr (0.31 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 94 x 61 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 shots | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | DB-65 | - |
| Self timer | - | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | microSD/microSDHC, internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $2,000 | $93 |