Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony A6600
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
77 Imaging
70 Features
96 Overall
80
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony A6600 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Announced February 2012
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 32000 (Raise to 102400)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 503g - 120 x 67 x 69mm
- Launched August 2019
- Replacement is Sony A6700
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony A6600 Overview
Following is a extended assessment of the Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony A6600, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a sizeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and A6600 (24MP) and the TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") and A6600 (APS-C) come with totally different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe TG-820 iHS was launched 8 years before the A6600 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony A6600 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the TG-820 iHS scores versus the A6600 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony A6600 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus TG-820 iHS and Sony Alpha a6600. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery and Sony A6600 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Sony A6600
TG-820 iHS | A6600 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 1030k | 922k | Sharper display (+108k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A6600 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
A6600 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2019 | February 2012 | More modern by 91 months | |
Manually focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Sony A6600
TG-820 iHS | A6600 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurement |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony A6600 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry around your camera frequently, you should think about its weight and size. The Olympus TG-820 iHS offers physical dimensions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Sony A6600 has specifications of 120mm x 67mm x 69mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.7") along with a weight of 503 grams (1.11 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony A6600 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have at that moment. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the TG-820 iHS and the A6600.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-820 iHS and A6600 is 92 and 77 respectively.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony A6600 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its hard to visualise the gap in sensor sizes merely by seeing specs. The pic underneath should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-820 iHS and A6600.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The TG-820 iHS due to its smaller sensor will make getting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Sony A6600 will provide extra detail utilizing its extra 12 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics much more aggressively. The more aged TG-820 iHS will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony A6600 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony A6600 Specifications
Olympus TG-820 iHS | Sony Alpha a6600 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Sony Alpha a6600 |
Category | Waterproof | Advanced Mirrorless |
Announced | 2012-02-08 | 2019-08-28 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VI | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 32000 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 102400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 425 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 121 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,030k dots | 922k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.71x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames per second | 11.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.50 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Rear Sync., Slow Sync., Red-eye reduction (On/Off selectable), Hi-speed sync, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 206 grams (0.45 pounds) | 503 grams (1.11 pounds) |
Dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 120 x 67 x 69mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 82 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.4 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1497 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 shots | 810 shots |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-50B | NP-FZ1000 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC + Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $500 | $1,198 |