Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB800F
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Introduced September 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2013
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung WB800F, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the WG-M1 (14MP) and the WB800F (16MP) is fairly similar and both cameras offer the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe WG-M1 was brought out 21 months later than the WB800F making them a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a in-depth comparison, here is a quick summation of how the WG-M1 scores versus the WB800F for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-M1 & Samsung WB800F. The entire galleries are available at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Samsung WB800F
| WG-M1 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2014 |  | January 2013 | More recent by 21 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Ricoh WG-M1
| WB800F | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.5") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 115k | Clearer display (+345k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung WB800F
| WG-M1 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to lug around your camera often, you have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-M1 provides external dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) and the Samsung WB800F has dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung WB800F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the WG-M1 against the WB800F.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the WG-M1 and WB800F is 91 and 92 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very tough to visualise the difference between sensor measurements just by reading specifications. The graphic below might provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-M1 and WB800F.
Plainly, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Samsung WB800F to offer you greater detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The newer WG-M1 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung WB800F |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2014-09-12 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 800 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | (1×) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 1.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 115k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | - | 16 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | - | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | - |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 190 grams (0.42 lbs) | 218 grams (0.48 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 shots | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | DB-65 | - |
| Self timer | - | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | microSD/microSDHC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $2,000 | $300 |
