Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A390
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
66 Imaging
54 Features
54 Overall
54
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A390 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Announced September 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
- Introduced July 2010
- Replaced the Sony A380
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A390 Overview
Here is a extended assessment of the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony A390, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by companies Ricoh and Sony. The sensor resolution of the WG-M1 (14MP) and the A390 (14MP) is very comparable but the WG-M1 (1/2.3") and A390 (APS-C) feature totally different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe WG-M1 was manufactured 4 years later than the A390 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Sony A390 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going in to a full comparison, below is a brief summation of how the WG-M1 scores against the A390 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A390 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-M1 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A390. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery & Sony A390 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Sony A390
| WG-M1 | A390 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2014 |  | July 2010 | Fresher by 51 months |
Reasons to pick Sony A390 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| A390 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display dimension | 2.7" |  | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.2") |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Sharper display (+115k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony A390
| WG-M1 | A390 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A390 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry your camera often, you need to take into account its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-M1 has outside measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) and the Sony A390 has specifications of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") with a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony A390 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilising during that time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the WG-M1 vs the A390.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-M1 and A390 is 91 and 66 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A390 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizing purely by going through specs. The graphic underneath will help give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-M1 and A390.
As you can plainly see, both cameras have got the exact same megapixels but not the same sensor sizing. The WG-M1 includes the smaller sensor which should make getting shallow depth of field harder. The younger WG-M1 will have an advantage in sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A390 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A390 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 |
| Type | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Announced | 2014-09-12 | 2010-07-28 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4592 x 3056 |
| Max native ISO | 800 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens zoom range | (1×) | - |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8 | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 143 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen diagonal | 1.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 115 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | - | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | - | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | - | 1/160s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | - |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video file format | H.264 | - |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 190 gr (0.42 lbs) | 549 gr (1.21 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 66 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.5 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.5 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 607 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photographs | 230 photographs |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | DB-65 | NP-FH50 |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | microSD/microSDHC, internal | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $2,000 | $500 |