Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony HX350
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
62 Imaging
47 Features
51 Overall
48
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony HX350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Revealed September 2014
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200 (Increase to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 652g - 130 x 93 x 103mm
- Introduced December 2016
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony HX350 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony HX350, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Ricoh and Sony. There exists a sizeable gap between the resolutions of the WG-M1 (14MP) and HX350 (20MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe WG-M1 was unveiled 3 years earlier than the HX350 and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Sony HX350 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise summary of how the WG-M1 matches up vs the HX350 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony HX350 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX350. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery and Sony HX350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Sony HX350
WG-M1 | HX350 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX350 over the Ricoh WG-M1
HX350 | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | December 2016 | September 2014 | More recent by 27 months | |
Manual focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.5") | |
Screen resolution | 922k | 115k | Crisper screen (+807k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony HX350
WG-M1 | HX350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony HX350 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera often, you'll have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-M1 provides physical measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) whilst the Sony HX350 has dimensions of 130mm x 93mm x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") and a weight of 652 grams (1.44 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony HX350 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are using at the time. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the WG-M1 versus the HX350.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-M1 and HX350 is 91 and 62 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony HX350 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's hard to imagine the difference between sensor measurements purely by checking a spec sheet. The photograph underneath will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-M1 and HX350.
Clearly, both of the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Sony HX350 to give greater detail having an extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures way more aggressively. The older WG-M1 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony HX350 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony HX350 Specifications
Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX350 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX350 |
Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2014-09-12 | 2016-12-20 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | BIONZ X |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 5184 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 800 | 3200 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | (1×) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8-6.3 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 1.5 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 115k dot | 922k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 202k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | - | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | - | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 8.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Off, auto, fill, slow sync, advanced, rear sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 1920 x 1080 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 190 grams (0.42 lb) | 652 grams (1.44 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 130 x 93 x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | 300 photos |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | DB-65 | - |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | microSD/microSDHC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC + Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $2,000 | - |