Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony W380
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
96 Imaging
36 Features
25 Overall
31
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony W380 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Released September 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.4-5.9) lens
- 117g - 91 x 52 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2010
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony W380 Overview
Let's look much closer at the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Sony W380, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Ricoh and Sony. The image resolution of the WG-M1 (14MP) and the W380 (14MP) is very well matched and both cameras boast the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe WG-M1 was manufactured 4 years after the W380 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Sony W380 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise summation of how the WG-M1 matches up against the W380 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony W380 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-M1 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W380. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery & Sony W380 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Sony W380
| WG-M1 | W380 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2014 |  | January 2010 | More modern by 57 months |
Reasons to pick Sony W380 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| W380 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 2.7" |  | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.2") |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Crisper display (+115k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony W380
| WG-M1 | W380 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony W380 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Ricoh WG-M1 has got physical measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Sony W380 has proportions of 91mm x 52mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") with a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Sony W380 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the WG-M1 and the W380.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-M1 and W380 is 91 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony W380 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be hard to imagine the difference between sensor sizes purely by reading through specs. The picture underneath may give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-M1 and W380.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size and the same megapixels and you can expect similar quality of pictures however you might want to consider the launch date of the products into consideration. The more modern WG-M1 should have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony W380 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony W380 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W380 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W380 |
| Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2014-09-12 | 2010-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 800 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | (1×) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.4-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 1.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 115k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | - | 2 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | - | 1/1600 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.80 m |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 190 gr (0.42 lbs) | 117 gr (0.26 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 91 x 52 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 pictures | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | DB-65 | NP-BN1 |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, portrait1/portrait2) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC, internal | SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $2,000 | $44 |