Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-3
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2439/d243927345de5a095aa4910f1a6bf1f8c46d0250" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS front Olympus XZ-2 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fbbce/fbbcef1a206577b4ac051e84289a628a2f2db4ba" alt="Sony Alpha NEX-3 front Sony Alpha NEX-3 front"
89 Imaging
54 Features
55 Overall
54
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Announced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 12800
- 1280 x 720 video
- Sony E Mount
- 297g - 117 x 62 x 33mm
- Released June 2010
- Replacement is Sony NEX-C3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-3 Overview
Below is a in depth comparison of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Sony NEX-3, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the NEX-3 (14MP) is fairly close but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and NEX-3 (APS-C) offer totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The XZ-2 iHS was announced 2 years later than the NEX-3 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go right into a in-depth comparison, here is a quick summary of how the XZ-2 iHS scores against the NEX-3 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-3 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony Alpha NEX-3. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Sony NEX-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony NEX-3
XZ-2 iHS | NEX-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | December 2012 | ![]() | June 2010 | More recent by 31 months |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-3 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
NEX-3 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony NEX-3
XZ-2 iHS | NEX-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Tilting | Tilting display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display dimensions |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 920k | Exact same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-3 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS offers exterior measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Sony NEX-3 has measurements of 117mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 297 grams (0.65 lbs).
Compare the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Sony NEX-3 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the XZ-2 iHS vs the NEX-3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb4b8/eb4b88e5d54770bbdbb5bf333940ed605d21119e" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-3 size comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-3 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and NEX-3 is 85 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fac03/fac0398fd9e26e8f7e86f793f0d2b03d2c077bd1" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-3 top view buttons comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-3 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-3 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its difficult to visualise the gap in sensor measurements simply by looking through technical specs. The visual underneath might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-2 iHS and NEX-3.
As you have seen, both of the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The XZ-2 iHS with its smaller sensor will make shooting bokeh harder and the Sony NEX-3 will result in greater detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics way more aggressively. The fresher XZ-2 iHS will have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc696/dc6969f66b9bfa1b954bee32fe4d1979f40858a0" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-3 sensor size comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-3 sensor size comparison"
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-3 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d1775/d1775221dddbb060ace034dec982dbe78c082d4a" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-3 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Alpha NEX-3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Alpha NEX-3 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2012-12-18 | 2010-06-07 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4592 x 3056 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 920k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | - | TFT Xtra Fine LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 7.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 12.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 346 grams (0.76 lbs) | 297 grams (0.65 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 117 x 62 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 49 | 68 |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | 22.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | 12.0 |
DXO Low light score | 216 | 830 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 photos | 330 photos |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-90B | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10sec (3 images)) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $450 | $0 |