Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony WX150
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
95 Imaging
42 Features
43 Overall
42
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony WX150 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Launched September 2014
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 133g - 95 x 56 x 22mm
- Launched February 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony WX150 Overview
Below, we will be looking at the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Sony WX150, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Ricoh and Sony. There is a large difference among the sensor resolutions of the WG-M1 (14MP) and WX150 (18MP) but they possess the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe WG-M1 was manufactured 2 years later than the WX150 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a short view of how the WG-M1 scores versus the WX150 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony WX150 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-M1 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX150. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery & Sony WX150 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Sony WX150
| WG-M1 | WX150 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2014 |  | February 2012 | More recent by 31 months |
Reasons to pick Sony WX150 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| WX150 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.5") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 115k | Sharper screen (+346k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony WX150
| WG-M1 | WX150 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony WX150 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera often, you'll have to take into account its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-M1 offers outside measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) whilst the Sony WX150 has specifications of 95mm x 56mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 133 grams (0.29 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Sony WX150 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the WG-M1 and the WX150.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the WG-M1 and WX150 is 91 and 95 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony WX150 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to envision the contrast in sensor measurements simply by viewing specs. The visual here may give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-M1 and WX150.
All in all, the 2 cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Sony WX150 to render extra detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more recent WG-M1 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony WX150 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony WX150 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX150 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX150 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2014-09-12 | 2012-02-28 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 18MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Maximum native ISO | 800 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | (1×) | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 1.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 115k dots | 461k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | - | ClearPhoto TFT LCD display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | - | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | - | 1/1600 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 3.70 m |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 190 gr (0.42 lb) | 133 gr (0.29 lb) |
| Dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 95 x 56 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 images | 240 images |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | DB-65 | NP-BN |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | microSD/microSDHC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $2,000 | $300 |