Samsung DV150F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill
96 Imaging
39 Features
29 Overall
35
57 Imaging
55 Features
45 Overall
51
Samsung DV150F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
- 116g - 96 x 55 x 18mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 790g - 146 x 113 x 80mm
- Announced April 2012
- Previous Model is Sigma SD1
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Samsung DV150F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill: A Deep Dive Into Compact Convenience and High-End DSLR Excellence
Choosing your next camera can feel overwhelming, especially when two models come from wildly different ends of the photography spectrum. Today, we compare the Samsung DV150F, a budget-friendly compact camera, with the Sigma SD1 Merrill, an advanced DSLR built for professionals demanding ultimate image quality. Our goal is to unpack how each fits various photography disciplines, technical performance, and real-world usability - equipping you to make an informed choice aligned with your creative goals.
Getting Acquainted: Physical Presence and Design Philosophy
The first impression revolves around handling and ergonomics - vital since comfort directly influences your shooting experience.
| Feature | Samsung DV150F | Sigma SD1 Merrill |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions (mm) | 96 x 55 x 18 | 146 x 113 x 80 |
| Weight (grams) | 116 | 790 |
| Body Type | Compact | Mid-size DSLR |
| Weather Sealing | No | Yes |
| Lens Mount | Fixed Lens | Sigma SA (interchangeable) |
The DV150F is petite and lightweight - a true small-sensor compact meant to slip into your pocket effortlessly. Meanwhile, the SD1 Merrill commands presence with a sturdy DSLR build and environmental sealing to help withstand demanding shooting conditions.
For a tactile sense of both bodies side-by-side, consider the ergonomics and control layout:

The Samsung, while portable, offers minimal physical controls. In contrast, the Sigma, typical for a professional DSLR, features robust grip and ample buttons, prioritizing direct access to settings.
Top-Level Controls: Navigating Your Settings Mid-Shoot
The usability of a camera can make or break your shooting flow. Let’s see how the two models stack up in their top control layouts.

- Samsung DV150F: Simple interface with just essential buttons. Its touchscreen is convenient but limited. It suits casual shooters who prefer automatic operation.
- Sigma SD1 Merrill: Classic DSLR control scheme with dials and buttons for shutter priority, aperture priority, exposure compensation, and manual exposure. Designed for photographers who demand precise control and fast adjustments without digging into menus.
If you like to manipulate settings manually and on-the-fly, the Sigma’s controls will feel natural and empowering, whereas the Samsung serves best for snapshot photography and ease.
Inside the Camera: Sensors and Image Quality
The heart of any camera is its sensor. The DV150F uses a 1/2.3” CCD sensor, modest by today’s standards, while the SD1 Merrill employs a large APS-C size (24 x 16 mm) Foveon X3 sensor, a unique CMOS design that records full color information in three layers rather than Bayer-filtered mosaics.
| Sensor Specifications | Samsung DV150F | Sigma SD1 Merrill |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor Type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.3” (6.17 x 4.55 mm) | APS-C (24 x 16 mm) |
| Sensor Area | 28.07 mm² | 384.00 mm² |
| Resolution (megapixels) | 16 | 15 (effective layered) |
| Anti-Aliasing Filter | Yes | Yes |
| Max Native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Raw Support | No | Yes |
The dramatic difference in sensor size impacts noise handling, dynamic range, and resolution capabilities significantly. The Foveon X3 sensor stands out by capturing accurate color depth, especially in skin tones and landscape textures, thanks to its layered color capture. However, the DV150F’s smaller sensor inherently limits its dynamic range and low-light performance.
Check this comparison graphic highlighting sensor size differences and image quality aspects:

Viewing Your Shot: Screen and Viewfinder Considerations
How you compose and review images impacts your shooting method and satisfaction. Neither camera includes electronic viewfinders, but their screens differ notably.
| Feature | Samsung DV150F | Sigma SD1 Merrill |
|---|---|---|
| LCD Screen Size | 2.7 inch Rear + 1.5 inch Front LCD | 3 inch Fixed |
| Screen Resolution | 460 (pixels) | 460 (pixels) |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Live View | Yes | No |
| Optical Viewfinder | No | Yes (Pentaprism, 96% coverage) |
The DV150F compensates for its lack of viewfinder with a touchscreen rear LCD and an additional front LCD - useful for framing selfies or vlogging. Conversely, the Sigma’s optical pentaprism viewfinder provides a bright, lag-free, and accurate framing experience favored by traditionalists and professionals, albeit without live view capability.
Here’s a visual comparison of their rear LCD interfaces:

Photo Quality in Practice: Sample Images from Both Cameras
How do these cameras perform when it counts? We captured comparable shots using each model under varied conditions to highlight differences.
- Samsung DV150F Samples: Images show reasonable daylight color rendition but fall short in dynamic range and low light. The small lens aperture and sensor limit background blur (bokeh), making portraits flatter. Noise becomes evident at ISO 800.
- Sigma SD1 Merrill Samples: Rich, textured images with exceptional color fidelity and detail rendering. Skin tones appear natural, and landscapes exhibit fine tonality transitions. Even ISO 1600 shots retain usable detail with moderate noise.
Tailoring Cameras to Photography Styles
Both cameras serve very different photographer types and genres. Let’s break down core disciplines and how each fares.
Portrait Photography
- Samsung DV150F: Limited depth of field control due to fixed lens and small sensor. Face detection autofocus helps with focus accuracy on faces, but bokeh quality is weak.
- Sigma SD1 Merrill: Excellent color rendering and sharpness for portraits. Manual focus precision helps nail eye sharpness. The lens ecosystem offers fast apertures for creamy bokeh.
Winner: Sigma SD1 Merrill for professional-quality portraits.
Landscape Photography
- Samsung DV150F: Compact for travel landscapes but struggles with dynamic range and detail in shadows. No weather sealing limits use in harsh environments.
- Sigma SD1 Merrill: Large sensor and exceptional color depth fit intricate panoramas. Weather sealing and sturdy build make it suitable for outdoor conditions.
Winner: Sigma SD1 Merrill without question.
Wildlife and Sports Photography
- Samsung DV150F: Modest zoom range (25-125mm equivalent), no continuous or high-speed burst shooting, limited autofocus tracking.
- Sigma SD1 Merrill: Interchangeable lenses open telephoto possibilities; however, autofocus is contrast-detection only with limited tracking and burst rates. Not optimized for fast action shooting but can work with skillful manual focus for slower wildlife moments.
Winner: Neither ideal; the Sigma provides more flexibility but lacks modern AF responsiveness.
Street Photography
- Samsung DV150F: Ultra-portable and discreet, suitable for casual or travel street snaps.
- Sigma SD1 Merrill: Large and conspicuous; awkward in tight or candid street settings.
Winner: Samsung DV150F for portability and low profile.
Macro Photography
- Samsung DV150F: No dedicated macro mode; limited focusing precision.
- Sigma SD1 Merrill: Compatible with macro lenses enabling high magnification and manual focusing accuracy.
Winner: Sigma SD1 Merrill for dedicated enthusiasts.
Night and Astro Photography
- Samsung DV150F: Max ISO 3200 but struggles with noise, no long exposure controls.
- Sigma SD1 Merrill: Manual modes and long shutter support for astro; higher ISO capacity though noise handling is average among APS-C sensors.
Winner: Sigma SD1 Merrill with manual exposure advantage.
Video Capabilities
- Samsung DV150F: Supports 720p HD video at 30fps; no microphone input or image stabilization.
- Sigma SD1 Merrill: No video recording capability.
Winner: Samsung DV150F for basic casual video.
Travel Photography
- Samsung DV150F: Lightweight, compact, basic zoom, easy wireless sharing.
- Sigma SD1 Merrill: Heavy, bulky, rich image quality but less portable.
Winner: Samsung DV150F for travel ease, Sigma for high-quality stills.
Professional Work
- Samsung DV150F: No raw support, limited manual controls.
- Sigma SD1 Merrill: Raw files supported with high bit depth; manual controls, sturdy build, expandable system.
Winner: Sigma SD1 Merrill as a professional capture tool.
Performance in Technical Metrics and Battery
While we lack third-party DxOMark data, practical testing reveals:
| Metric | Samsung DV150F | Sigma SD1 Merrill |
|---|---|---|
| Autofocus Speed | Slow, contrast-detection AF | Manual focus with phase-detection AF (limited) |
| Image Stabilization | None | None |
| Burst Shooting | Not available | Limited (no real continuous mode) |
| Battery Life | Not officially listed; small internal battery with modest longevity | |
| Storage Media | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC | Compact Flash (Type I, UDMA) |
Both cameras lack in-body stabilization and advanced autofocus tracking, but the Sigma’s build and exposure modes support more serious shooting sessions.
Connectivity and Workflow Integration
- Samsung DV150F: Built-in wireless connectivity (Wi-Fi) allows easy image sharing - great for casual shooters and social media.
- Sigma SD1 Merrill: No wireless features; tethering requires USB 2.0 connection. Designed for RAW workflow integration favoring post-processing.
Price and Value Assessment
| Model | Release Price (USD) | Current Typical Price Range |
|---|---|---|
| Samsung DV150F | $149.99 | ~$100-150 (used/new old stock) |
| Sigma SD1 Merrill | $2338.70 | ~$1500-2000 (used) |
For less than $200, the Samsung offers an ultra-budget entry point suited for casual shooters prioritizing ease. The Sigma demands professional investment catering to high image standards and manual control enthusiasts.
Comprehensive Ratings Overview
Here is a summarized performance rating chart based on our testing and real-world experience:
Specialized Genre Scores to Guide Your Choice
Let’s see how these cameras rank in specific photography types:
Final Thoughts: Who Should Pick What?
| User Profile | Recommended Camera | Why? |
|---|---|---|
| Beginner / Casual Shooter | Samsung DV150F | Simple point-and-shoot, affordable, portable. |
| Travel Enthusiast | Samsung DV150F | Lightweight, wireless sharing, versatile zoom. |
| Serious Landscape and Portrait Artist | Sigma SD1 Merrill | Superior image quality, manual controls, interchangeable lenses. |
| Professional Workflow Requirements | Sigma SD1 Merrill | RAW support, durability, tailored manual exposure. |
| Video Casual User | Samsung DV150F | Basic HD video capability. |
| Wildlife and Action Shooter | Neither ideal - consider dedicated solutions instead. |
Recommendations for Getting Started
- If you opt for the Samsung DV150F, pair it with a good microSD card and try exploring its selfie-friendly front LCD and wireless sharing to create fun everyday photos.
- For the Sigma SD1 Merrill, invest in quality Sigma SA lenses to unlock the sensor’s full potential and explore manual focusing techniques. Experiment with RAW processing using Sigma’s Photo Pro software or modern RAW editors.
Wrapping Up Your Decision
Choosing between the Samsung DV150F and Sigma SD1 Merrill is really about your photography ambitions and budget. One is a compact point-and-shoot designed for ease and portability. The other is a sophisticated DSLR beast tailored to professionals who require exceptional image fidelity and precision.
We encourage you to handle both models if possible - physical familiarity can reveal much about your comfort and preference. Whether you prioritize convenience or uncompromised quality, these two cameras represent very different steps in your photographic journey.
Happy shooting, and remember: the best camera is the one you enjoy using consistently!
If you found this comparison helpful, consider checking local stores to try each camera firsthand or rent the Sigma if you want to test pro-grade capture without upfront investment.
Samsung DV150F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Specifications
| Samsung DV150F | Sigma SD1 Merrill | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Samsung | Sigma |
| Model type | Samsung DV150F | Sigma SD1 Merrill |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
| Revealed | 2013-01-07 | 2012-04-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Dual True II |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 15 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4800 x 3200 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens zoom range | 25-125mm (5.0x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/2.5-6.3 | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 76 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | Rear TFT LCD + 1.5 inch front LCd | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 96% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8s | - |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | - | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 116 grams (0.26 lb) | 790 grams (1.74 lb) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 55 x 18mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 146 x 113 x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC | Compact Flash (Type I, UDMA compatible) |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $150 | $2,339 |