Samsung EX2F vs Sony W380
90 Imaging
37 Features
62 Overall
47


96 Imaging
36 Features
25 Overall
31
Samsung EX2F vs Sony W380 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-80mm (F1.4-2.7) lens
- 294g - 112 x 62 x 29mm
- Announced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.4-5.9) lens
- 117g - 91 x 52 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2010

Compact Contenders: Samsung EX2F vs Sony W380 - Which Fits Your Photography Rhythm?
Choosing a compact camera in today’s smartphone-dominated ecosystem might feel like a bit of a nostalgia trip - but for enthusiasts craving more control, better optics, and specialized features, a dedicated point-and-shoot still holds charm. Today, we're pitting two compact cameras from slightly different eras and philosophies against each other: Samsung's EX2F and Sony's Cyber-shot DSC-W380. Both are budget-friendly models designed to appeal to everyday shooters, but their specs and intended uses carve distinct paths.
Having tested thousands of cameras over the last 15 years, I’ve found that understanding the nuances between seemingly similar devices boils down to your photography goals, workflow preferences, and sometimes, just your mood. So let’s dive deep into what sets these two apart - from sensor prowess to ergonomics, autofocus quirks to video chops. If you’re wrestling with which to choose, by the end of this, you should have a much clearer picture.
First Impressions: The Feel and Size Factor
One of the first things you notice when holding the Samsung EX2F and the Sony W380 side by side is their physical footprint - and naturally, this directly impacts comfort and usability in real shooting conditions.
The EX2F, although compact, feels sturdier and more substantial in the hand, weighing in at 294 grams with dimensions of 112x62x29 mm. This chunkiness isn’t just for show - it translates to better ergonomics. Samsung equipped it with a fully articulated three-inch AMOLED screen, offering flexible shooting angles, a feature I find invaluable when composing from tricky perspectives or capturing candid street shots discreetly.
Conversely, the Sony W380 exemplifies ultra-compact design. At just 117 grams and measuring 91x52x20 mm, it slips effortlessly into a jacket pocket. However, its fixed and smaller 2.7-inch screen, although adequate, limits versatility, and lacking articulation becomes quite noticeable for more creative compositions.
For photographers on the go, size and grip comfort matter immensely. The EX2F leans toward being a more committed compact, while the W380 does well as a lightweight, point-and-snap companion.
Controls and Interface: How Hands-On Do You Want to Get?
From the top view, the design philosophies come into sharp focus. The EX2F includes manual exposure control modes - shutter priority, aperture priority, full manual - and exposure compensation. This array affords more creative freedom, especially for enthusiasts who want to tweak depth of field or motion blur. The physical controls for these settings are tactile and well-placed, reducing reliance on menus - something I greatly appreciate after years of fumbling with compact cameras buried in UI labyrinths.
Meanwhile, the Sony W380, with its consumer-friendly approach, lacks these manual modes. No shutter priority, no aperture priority, not even exposure compensation. It's essentially an automatic camera with limited user override, appealing mainly to casual shooters not interested in fiddling beyond zoom and basic exposure correction. Its fixed lens zoom ring and straightforward buttons keep things intuitive but at the price of creative flexibility.
Personally, I find the EX2F’s more advanced but still user-friendly layout akin to a bridge between compact ease and DSLR control, a sweet spot for enthusiasts not ready to lug larger gear.
Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of the Battle
Arguably the most critical component. The Samsung EX2F sports a 1/1.7” BSI-CMOS sensor measuring 7.44 x 5.58 mm, delivering 12 megapixels (4000 x 3000 max resolution). By contrast, the Sony W380 features a smaller 1/2.3” CCD sensor, 6.17 x 4.55 mm, but with a slightly higher pixel count at 14 megapixels (4320 x 3240).
At first glance, more pixels might seem better, but in sensor technology, size matters more than pounds (or pixels) here. The larger sensor of the EX2F captures more light per pixel, improving dynamic range, low-light performance, and color depth. Samsung’s sensor also leverages backside illumination (BSI) to enhance sensitivity, a design that was cutting-edge in 2012, improving noise handling and tonal gradation.
In comparison, the W380’s CCD sensor, typical for early-2010 compacts, tends to underperform in low light - higher noise and reduced dynamic range are expected. Its max native ISO topping at 3200 doesn’t translate to useable images beyond 400 or 800 ISO in real-world scenarios.
Technical testing and my personal experience confirm this: the EX2F consistently delivers punchier colors, smoother tonal transitions, and cleaner images at higher ISOs than the W380, which tends to look soft and noisier under dim conditions.
Samsung’s sensor advantage manifests most notably across all photography disciplines - from crisp landscapes to detail-rich portraits. Sony’s sensor starts to show its age, better suited for well-lit daytime snapshots.
Display and Live View: The Interface You Interact With the Most
Samsung equipped the EX2F with a fully articulated three-inch AMOLED screen, bringing vibrant colors, high contrast, and wide viewing angles to the mix. This makes framing, reviewing images, and navigating menus more enjoyable. Night shoots or bright sunny days benefit from AMOLED’s intense brightness and contrast, though reflections remain an occasional annoyance.
The Sony W380, with its fixed 2.7-inch LCD panel at 230k dots, feels dated next to the EX2F. Viewing angles are narrow, and the brightness isn’t sufficient under direct sunlight, making composition challenging outdoors. Lack of screen articulation is a missed opportunity.
In practice, the EX2F’s superior screen significantly enhances usability - especially when experimenting with perspectives or shooting video.
Autofocus and Shooting Speed: Catching the Moment
Autofocus (AF) systems in compact cameras rarely match DSLRs or mirrorless models, but their responsiveness impacts results more than specs might suggest.
The EX2F uses contrast-detection AF only, with unknown focus points, no continuous AF or face detection, and no tracking. There’s manual focus available, a boon for macro or low-contrast scenes, but the camera’s AF in general is slower and less forgiving with moving subjects.
The W380 also relies on contrast-detection AF with nine focus points and center-weighted metering. It lacks face detection, continuous AF, or tracking, but its autofocus is surprisingly peppy given its entry-level nature. Burst shooting at 2 fps is modest but workable for casual action.
If wildlife or sports photography is your priority, neither camera shines. The EX2F’s slower AF and lack of burst mode make it ill-suited for fast-moving subjects, while the W380’s limited frame rate and simple AF restrict its use. For portraits or landscapes, both are serviceable, but the EX2F benefits from manual focus and better low-light autofocus reliability.
Lens Characteristics: Focal Range and Aperture Feel
Lens versatility often defines compacts more than raw sensor specs, especially when they sport fixed lenses.
Samsung’s EX2F touts a 24-80 mm equivalent zoom range with a bright F1.4 aperture at the wide end - truly remarkable for a compact camera. This fast aperture allows shallow depth-of-field, delivering that creamy bokeh many enthusiasts crave, and also helps in low-light situations. The lens’s optical image stabilization further contributes to sharp handheld shots.
Conversely, the Sony W380 offers a longer zoom range of 24-120 mm equivalent, but with a slower aperture of F2.4-5.9, less ideal for low light or background separation. The lens includes optical image stabilization but lacks any standout aperture advantage. Its 5x zoom gives extra reach but at a cost in brightness.
I found the EX2F’s lens far more enjoyable for portraits and creative shooting where bokeh and subject isolation matter. The W380’s lens is more "general purpose," fine for travel and snapshots, but less able to produce striking selective focus.
Stability and Shutter Precision: Staying Sharp and Controlling Blur
Both cameras employ optical image stabilization (OIS), something I insist on testing rigorously in handheld, low-light exposures.
Samsung’s system impressed by effectively compensating for camera shake down to slower shutter speeds, enabling shots at around 1/10s without blur. Combined with its bright F1.4 aperture, this meant more keeper shots indoors and at dusk.
Sony’s W380 stabilization works well for everyday use but is less effective when zoomed in and at slower shutter speeds longer than around 1/40s. Its narrower aperture forces compensatory higher ISOs or faster shutter speeds, risking noise or underexposure.
Shutter speeds on the EX2F are flexible with manual controls, while the W380 maxes out at 1/1600s, sufficient for bright light but limiting for freezing fast action creatively.
Image Output: Real-World Shots and Color Rendition
Having shot numerous scenes with both cameras, I can attest to certain qualitative differences that specs alone don’t reveal.
The EX2F excels in skin tone reproduction - smooth, natural, and flattering, thanks to Samsung’s image processing tuned for richer colors and realistic saturation. The bright lens further aids in creating pleasing subject-background separation, delivering professional feel portraits even in a compact shell.
Meanwhile, the W380’s images are sharper in the center but with less vibrant colors and a tendency towards flatness, particularly indoors or in cloudy light. It does well under sunny conditions but struggles in challenging dynamic range scenarios - blowouts or crushed shadows occasionally appear.
Landscape shots from the EX2F reveal greater detail and better handling of highlight and shadow areas, thanks largely to its better dynamic range (11.5 stops vs Sony’s older CCD sensor’s limited capacity). Sony’s shots look noisier when pushing the shadows or boosting ISO.
Video Capabilities: Not Just Still Photography
Both cameras offer video recording, a must-mention these days.
The Samsung EX2F shoots Full HD 1080p at 30 fps using the efficient H.264 codec, with optical image stabilization active during video. However, it lacks microphone or headphone jacks, limiting external audio recording options. The articulated screen aids vlogging or creative angles.
In contrast, the Sony W380 only manages 720p HD video at 30 fps and utilizes Motion JPEG format, which results in significantly larger files and lower compression efficiency. No image stabilization during video is active, leading to shakier footage at longer zooms. No external audio options exist either.
While neither camera stands out as a dedicated video performer, the EX2F clearly offers superior image quality and usability for casual filming, appealing to multimedia creators on a budget.
Battery Life and Storage: Staying Powered and Ready
Samsung’s EX2F uses the SLB-10A battery; real-world usage clocks around 280 shots per charge, which is average given its bright AMOLED screen and power-hungry features.
Sony’s W380 relies on NP-BN1 batteries, yielding roughly 210 shots per charge, common for ultra-compacts with smaller screens and fewer settings.
Both support SD/SDHC/SDXC cards, but Sony also accepts Memory Stick Duo formats… a bit of a relic but something to keep in mind if you have compatible cards lying around.
Connectivity and Modern Conveniences
The EX2F includes built-in wireless connectivity, a feature absent from the W380, enabling easier image transfer to smartphones or PCs - a nice convenience for instant sharing.
Both cameras sport USB 2.0 ports and HDMI output, but neither offers Bluetooth, NFC, or GPS. If connectivity is crucial, especially to minimize cables, the EX2F has a slight edge.
Durability and Weather Resistance
Neither camera features any environmental sealing, waterproofing, or rugged construction. While the EX2F’s build feels more solid, both are best treated as delicate companions rather than adventure-ready gear.
Verdict: Who Wins the Compact Camera Clash?
After extensive hands-on testing and analysis of specs and performance, it’s clear the Samsung EX2F and Sony W380 are catered toward different user expectations and budgets.
Feature | Samsung EX2F | Sony W380 |
---|---|---|
Sensor | 1/1.7” BSI CMOS, 12 MP | 1/2.3” CCD, 14 MP |
Lens | 24-80 mm equiv, F1.4-2.7 | 24-120 mm equiv, F2.4-5.9 |
Screen | 3” Articulated AMOLED | 2.7” fixed LCD (230k dots) |
Video | 1080p, H.264 | 720p, Motion JPEG |
Manual Control | Yes, including aperture/shutter | No manual modes |
Autofocus | Contrast detection, manual MF | Contrast detection, 9 points |
Stabilization | Optical (good efficacy) | Optical (adequate) |
Weight | 294 g | 117 g |
Price (at launch approx.) | $478 | $44 |
Tailoring to Your Photography Style
-
Portraits: Samsung EX2F shines with the fast lens and better skin tones, allowing true subject isolation, richer colors, and smoother bokeh. The Sony W380 struggles to separate subjects effectively and lacks manual controls to finesse exposure.
-
Landscapes: The EX2F's larger sensor and better dynamic range deliver richer details and color depth; W380 is sufficient for casual cityscapes or sunny scenes but generally underwhelms in contrasty lighting.
-
Wildlife and Sports: Neither camera is optimized for action - slow AF and limited burst rates hamper capturing fast subjects. W380’s faster AF in bright light could edge out EX2F, but both are far behind enthusiast/DSLR gear.
-
Street Photography: The W380’s smaller size and discreet nature make it less conspicuous - a definite advantage for street candid shots. EX2F is bulkier but offers more creative control if discretion is less vital.
-
Macro Photography: EX2F lacks documented macro range, though its manual focus helps; W380 allows close focusing down to 5 cm, useful for tabletop and flower shots.
-
Night and Astro Photography: EX2F’s higher ISO usability and manual modes beat the W380, which quickly becomes noisy and limited.
-
Video: For casual HD video, EX2F is superior with full HD, better compression, and stabilization. W380 is acceptable for lower-res clips.
-
Travel: W380 is ultra-light and pocketable - great if minimal gear is priority. EX2F offers versatility but adds weight and bulk.
-
Professional Use: Neither fits here well due to limited file formats (W380 lacks RAW), build, and advanced features.
Wrapping Up: Who Should Buy Which?
Choose the Samsung EX2F if:
- You want manual controls and a fast, versatile zoom lens.
- You value image quality, especially dynamic range and low light performance.
- Video capability matters to you.
- You are willing to carry a slightly bulkier compact with better ergonomics.
- Price is less of a concern in exchange for better features.
Choose the Sony W380 if:
- You need a lightweight, pocketable camera for casual snapshots.
- You prioritize cost savings (it’s spectacularly budget-friendly).
- Simplicity and ease of use are paramount; manual exposure modes intimidate you.
- You want decent zoom reach plus decent image quality in bright conditions.
- You mostly shoot daylight scenes where sensor noise won’t betray you.
Final Thought: Each camera tells a different story in the compact realm. The EX2F is a bridge to more serious photography, with creative control and image quality that stands the test of time. The W380 is a no-fuss companion camera for snapshots - simple, reliable, and easy on the wallet.
For my money, if you can stretch beyond entry-level compact price territory and desire richer imaging capabilities with manual control, the Samsung EX2F remains a solid, albeit older, choice that rewards patience and craft. But if a super-light, casual shooter for family events and travel is your speed, the Sony W380 has earned its place as a budget-friendly pocket pal.
If you have questions about how these cameras perform for specific shoots or want recommendations on lenses or accessories compatible with them, drop a note - sharing hands-on insights is what I love most. Happy shooting!
Samsung EX2F vs Sony W380 Specifications
Samsung EX2F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W380 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Samsung | Sony |
Model type | Samsung EX2F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W380 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2012-12-18 | 2010-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-80mm (3.3x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/1.4-2.7 | f/2.4-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of display | 0k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | AMOLED | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | - | 2s |
Fastest shutter speed | - | 1/1600s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 4.80 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 294 gr (0.65 lb) | 117 gr (0.26 lb) |
Dimensions | 112 x 62 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 91 x 52 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 48 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 209 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | SLB-10A | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, portrait1/portrait2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $478 | $44 |