Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Olympus VR-320
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Released May 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched July 2011
- Replacement is Olympus VR-330
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Below is a extended analysis of the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Olympus VR-320, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both designed by Olympus. The image resolution of the TG-1 iHS (12MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is very well matched and both cameras offer the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-1 iHS was brought out 10 months later than the VR-320 so they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the TG-1 iHS matches up against the VR-320 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS & Olympus VR-320. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery & Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Olympus VR-320
TG-1 iHS | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | May 2012 | July 2011 | More recent by 10 months | |
Display resolution | 610k | 230k | Crisper display (+380k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
VR-320 | TG-1 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Olympus VR-320
TG-1 iHS | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Lack of manual focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display size | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to lug around your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-1 iHS offers outer measurements of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-320 has sizing of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Olympus VR-320 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are working with at the time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the TG-1 iHS vs the VR-320.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-1 iHS and VR-320 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its hard to visualise the difference between sensor measurements merely by looking at a spec sheet. The photograph underneath will give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-1 iHS and VR-320.
As you can see, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Olympus VR-320 to resolve extra detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop images a bit more aggressively. The more modern TG-1 iHS will have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Olympus VR-320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Olympus VR-320 |
Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2012-05-08 | 2011-07-19 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VI | TruePic III |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 610k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 4.70 m |
Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 230 gr (0.51 lbs) | 158 gr (0.35 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photographs | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LI90B | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | - | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at release | $399 | $179 |