Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Olympus VR-320
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Released May 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched July 2011
- Replacement is Olympus VR-330
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Below is a extended analysis of the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Olympus VR-320, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both designed by Olympus. The image resolution of the TG-1 iHS (12MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is very well matched and both cameras offer the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-1 iHS was brought out 10 months later than the VR-320 so they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the TG-1 iHS matches up against the VR-320 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS & Olympus VR-320. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery & Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Olympus VR-320
| TG-1 iHS | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | May 2012 |  | July 2011 | More recent by 10 months |
| Display resolution | 610k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+380k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
| VR-320 | TG-1 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Olympus VR-320
| TG-1 iHS | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to lug around your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-1 iHS offers outer measurements of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-320 has sizing of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Olympus VR-320 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are working with at the time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the TG-1 iHS vs the VR-320.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-1 iHS and VR-320 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its hard to visualise the difference between sensor measurements merely by looking at a spec sheet. The photograph underneath will give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-1 iHS and VR-320.
As you can see, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Olympus VR-320 to resolve extra detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop images a bit more aggressively. The more modern TG-1 iHS will have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Olympus VR-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Olympus VR-320 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2012-05-08 | 2011-07-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VI | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 610k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.70 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230 gr (0.51 lbs) | 158 gr (0.35 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photographs | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI90B | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | - | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $399 | $179 |
