Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Olympus VR-320
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9548e/9548e39ccb5afab6cfb852bfe92d7158e2c24b0d" alt="Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS front Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7e98/b7e986b748f8a3574682ef0ffce60a8d7bbbe4e3" alt="Olympus VR-320 front Olympus VR-320 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Released May 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched July 2011
- Replacement is Olympus VR-330
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Below is a extended analysis of the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Olympus VR-320, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both designed by Olympus. The image resolution of the TG-1 iHS (12MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is very well matched and both cameras offer the same sensor size (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The TG-1 iHS was brought out 10 months later than the VR-320 so they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the TG-1 iHS matches up against the VR-320 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS & Olympus VR-320. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery & Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Olympus VR-320
TG-1 iHS | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | May 2012 | ![]() | July 2011 | More recent by 10 months |
Display resolution | 610k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+380k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
VR-320 | TG-1 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Olympus VR-320
TG-1 iHS | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to lug around your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-1 iHS offers outer measurements of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-320 has sizing of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Olympus VR-320 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are working with at the time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the TG-1 iHS vs the VR-320.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6e89/c6e8988420efb49849f74c3cbe104040b841d8c9" alt="Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-1 iHS and VR-320 is 91 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/feab1/feab19ecc6640cfbcce7a70f6ed267d8fb867c6f" alt="Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its hard to visualise the difference between sensor measurements merely by looking at a spec sheet. The photograph underneath will give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-1 iHS and VR-320.
As you can see, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Olympus VR-320 to resolve extra detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop images a bit more aggressively. The more modern TG-1 iHS will have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3571d/3571d6662b7f05d51395030615449984eb811a2c" alt="Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3e846/3e846b6ff7e394c529f9e6ca7062cd56f8a62a51" alt="Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Olympus VR-320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Olympus VR-320 |
Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2012-05-08 | 2011-07-19 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VI | TruePic III |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 610k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 4.70 m |
Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 230 gr (0.51 lbs) | 158 gr (0.35 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photographs | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LI90B | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | - | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at release | $399 | $179 |