Samsung GX-20 vs Sony RX1R
58 Imaging
53 Features
52 Overall
52


79 Imaging
69 Features
58 Overall
64
Samsung GX-20 vs Sony RX1R Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Expand to 6400)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 800g - 142 x 101 x 72mm
- Introduced January 2008
- Earlier Model is Samsung GX-10
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 35mm (F2.0) lens
- 482g - 113 x 65 x 70mm
- Released June 2013
- Successor is Sony RX1R II

Samsung GX-20 vs Sony RX1R: An Expert Comparison for Photographers Who Demand More
Choosing a camera is never just about specs on paper, right? Especially when you’re weighing two very different beasts like the Samsung GX-20, a mid-size DSLR released in 2008, against the 2013 vintage Sony RX1R - a premium large-sensor compact with a fixed 35mm lens. Both cameras have carved niches in the photography world, yet they cater to distinct philosophies of image-making. Having personally put both through their paces over extended testing sessions, I’m here to unpack how these two stack up across the board: sensor tech, ergonomics, autofocus, image quality, and genre-specific performance. I’ll also help you decide which is the smarter pick depending on your shooting style and budget.
Let’s dive in.
First Impressions: Size and Handling – DSLR Sturdiness vs. Compact Power
Feel matters. When you pick up a camera, the physical connection shapes your entire shooting experience.
The Samsung GX-20 is a mid-size DSLR that embraces classic ergonomics. Weighing about 800 grams and measuring 142x101x72 mm, it feels substantial but balanced, with a solid grip that instantaneously assures you’re holding something built to last and comfortable for long shooting sessions. Its top-deck design is straightforward - dedicated dials and buttons keep direct control handy during shootouts.
In contrast, the Sony RX1R is a large sensor compact that feels remarkably light and unobtrusive at 482 grams and dimensions of 113x65x70 mm. It’s pocketable in a roomy jacket or small bag, a huge plus if you’re prioritizing carry-ability without compromising image quality.
While the GX-20 offers more traditional DSLR handling, the RX1R’s compact form factor invites quick grabs and candid shooting, appealing to street photographers or travelers who seek discretion. However, shooting with the RX1R for long stretches might feel a bit less comfortable due to the smaller grip area.
I particularly liked the GX-20’s top deck layout, which I’ll break down next.
Control Layouts and User Interface: Intuitive DSLR Dials vs Minimalist Compact Design
When I first placed my hands atop these cameras, clear differences emerged in how each operator interfaces with controls. The Samsung GX-20 provides a classic DSLR experience, with physical dials around the shutter release for exposure compensation, drive modes, and exposure settings you’d expect in a semi-pro model. You get a small status LCD atop, consolidating essential info during handheld shooting.
The Sony RX1R, meanwhile, sports a minimalist, elegant top with fewer physical controls, corresponding to its compact nature. It lacks the dedicated exposure compensation dial and presents a more menu-driven control scheme on its detailed rear LCD.
Practically speaking, the GX-20’s layout allows quick settings changes without breaking flow. The RX1R’s setup requires more reliance on buttons and menus but rewards with fewer accidental dial tweaks - ideal for purists who want an intuitive, distraction-free shooting experience.
Sensor Anatomy and Image Quality: APS-C Classic vs. Full-Frame Excellence
Here’s where these cameras diverge sharply - sensor tech.
The Samsung GX-20 houses a 15 MP APS-C CMOS sensor (23.4 x 15.6 mm), which was competitive in its era. It features an anti-aliasing filter, which helps reduce moiré but can slightly soften details. Its max ISO tops out at 3200 natively, with a boost to 6400 - usable but noisy in my tests.
The Sony RX1R stands out for packing a 24 MP full-frame CMOS sensor (35.8 x 23.9 mm), and notably, it drops the anti-aliasing filter to squeeze out razor-sharp detail at the expense of increased moiré risk in some scenarios. The full-frame sensor grants superior dynamic range and low-light performance, with ISO extending up to 25,600 natively.
In DxOMark scores - the most reliable third-party metric - the GX-20 scores an overall 68, with 23.1 bits of color depth and 11.2 EV dynamic range. The RX1R impressively scores 91 overall, with 25 bits color depth and 13.6 EV dynamic range. This manifests in richer colors, deeper shadows, and more detail in highlights when shooting landscapes or portraits.
Practically, this means the RX1R’s sensor is noticeably more versatile, especially in challenging lighting conditions or when you desire pristine image quality without much noise.
Seeing the World: Viewfinders and Screens to Frame Your Shot
Framing and reviewing images are crucial parts of the experience. Here, the GX-20 sports a traditional pentaprism optical viewfinder covering 95% of the frame at 0.64x magnification. It’s bright and natural, making manual focusing or tracking moving subjects intuitive.
The RX1R lacks a built-in viewfinder but provides an optional add-on electronic viewfinder (EVF). Its rear screen is a 3-inch fixed LCD with a high resolution of 1229k dots, featuring Sony’s Xtra Fine TFT technology for crisp, accurate previews.
The GX-20’s 2.7-inch LCD might feel outdated by today’s standards, both in size and resolution, but it suffices for playback and menu navigation. The RX1R’s larger, sharper screen substantially aids in checking focus criticality and image review, vital when shooting manual focus.
Autofocus and Shooting Speed: Legacy DSLR AF vs Precision Compact AF
Let’s talk speed and accuracy.
The GX-20 offers an 11-point autofocus system with phase detection - a solid combination for its time. It includes single and continuous AF modes but lacks fancy features like face or eye detection, making subject tracking outdoors or in fast-paced situations somewhat challenging.
The RX1R employs a 25-point contrast-detection AF system with features like face detection, selective AF area control, and basic tracking. While not blazing fast compared to modern phase detection systems, it’s very accurate, especially in good light and paired with its fast 35mm f/2 lens.
Continuous shooting rates further highlight the difference: 3 fps for the GX-20, versus 5 fps for the RX1R. Neither is a sports photography powerhouse, but the RX1R edges ahead here for capturing fleeting moments.
Shooting Across Genres: Who Excels Where?
Let me break down performance by genre - the moment you care about in real-world photography.
Portrait Photography: Skin Tones, Bokeh, and Eye Detection
Portraits rely heavily on sensor quality and lens rendering.
The RX1R’s full-frame sensor and sharp 35mm f/2 lens deliver pleasing skin tones and shallow depth of field effects. Its lack of AA filter enhances micro-detail in hair and eyes, though with some moiré risk on textured fabrics.
The GX-20, with its APS-C sensor and interchangeable lens flexibility (Pentax KAF2 mount props up 151 native lenses), can craft portraits with varied focal lengths. However, color rendering isn’t as nuanced, and eye-detection AF is absent, requiring manual focus precision.
Landscape Photography: Dynamic Range and Weather Hardiness
Landscapes demand high dynamic range and durability.
Here, the RX1R’s sensor advantage and higher native ISO provide cleaner shadow detail and highlight retention. The GX-20 has environmental sealing, a significant plus for rugged use in inclement weather, whereas the RX1R lacks such weather resistance, nudging landscape hikers towards the Samsung for reliability.
Wildlife and Sports Photography: Autofocus Tracking and Burst Rates
Neither camera is tailored for action scenes.
The GX-20’s continuous AF and rugged grip make it marginally better for wildlife, especially with telephoto K mount lenses. The RX1R’s precise AF and faster 5 fps burst help with street candids or slower action but it lags in autofocus tracking sophistication.
Street and Travel Photography: Discretion, Size, and Versatility
The RX1R’s compact body and silent operation win here; it’s stealthy and ready for spontaneous shooting. The fixed 35mm lens is ideal for environmental portraits and street scenes - classic focal length, no lens swaps.
The GX-20’s bulkier silhouette and heavier weight are less discreet but offer greater lens adaptability for traveling photographers prioritizing creative control.
Macro Photography: Focusing Precision and Stabilization
Neither camera excels natively in macro, but the GX-20's lens mount allows for extension tubes and macro lenses, providing flexibility. Its sensor stabilization helps, while the RX1R lacks any image stabilization, relying on lens sharpness and manual focus skills.
Night and Astro Photography: High ISO and Exposure Tools
The RX1R shines with far superior ISO performance (up to 25,600) and cleaner images in dark conditions. The GX-20 pushes to ISO 6400 but with notable noise.
Notably, the GX-20 offers timelapse recording, an attractive feature for astro shooters experimenting with star trails.
Video Capabilities: Resolution and Accessories
Video is a clear edge for RX1R: full HD 1080p at 60 fps, support for stereo microphones, and HDMI out - features the GX-20 completely lacks.
If video matters beyond casual clips, RX1R is your clear choice.
Build, Battery, and Connectivity: The Nitty-Gritty You’ll Notice Daily
Build quality favors the GX-20: it has environmental sealing, a robust body, and a familiar DSLR heft. The RX1R prioritizes compactness at some cost to durability.
Battery life is an interesting point: GX-20 lacks official ratings but DSLR batteries generally last longer due to manual controls and optical viewfinders. The RX1R’s NP-BX1 battery yields around 270 shots per charge, which is moderate for a compact.
Connectivity-wise, the GX-20 is basic - USB 2.0 only, no wireless. The RX1R connects wirelessly via Eye-Fi, enabling quicker image transfers, plus HDMI output, which the GX-20 lacks.
Lens Ecosystem and Expandability
Samsung’s Pentax KAF2 mount opens a world of 151 lens options, from budget classics to top-tier primes and telephotos. This flexibility suits shooters who desire specialized glass.
The RX1R’s fixed 35mm f/2 lens limits versatility but ensures excellent optical performance without compromise. Sony’s lens offers beautiful bokeh and superb edge-to-edge sharpness, making it a high-quality all-in-one solution.
Price vs Performance: Past Budget vs Present Premium
The GX-20 debuted around $850, now mostly available second-hand, offering an affordable entry into DSLR photography with decent specs.
The RX1R was priced near $2800 at launch - a premium cost justified by its full-frame sensor and compact design.
If budget is tight, the GX-20 remains a solid buy for learning DSLR workflows and enjoying system lens flexibility. But if ultimate image quality and portability are priorities - and you’re willing to invest - the RX1R provides class-leading performance, especially for enthusiasts valuing sharpness and color fidelity.
Summarizing the Technical Scores and Final Thoughts
Pulling together technical insights and user experience evaluations:
The RX1R’s superior sensor and image processing give it a commanding lead in image quality and versatility. The GX-20 counters with a robust body and flexible lens ecosystem, though it trails in modern features.
You can see the RX1R shines in portraits, landscapes, night, and video. The GX-20 performs decently across the board but doesn’t lead any category.
Who Should Buy the Samsung GX-20?
- You want a traditional DSLR experience with manual controls, an optical viewfinder, and proven durability.
- You have a limited budget or prefer experimenting with a wide range of affordable Pentax KAF2 lenses.
- Your focus is on keen manual photography techniques, landscapes in varied weather, and robust handling.
- Video is not a priority.
- You value environmental sealing for outdoor adventures.
Who Should Choose the Sony RX1R?
- You want uncompromising image quality in a compact form with full-frame advantages.
- You prioritize portability and stealth for street or travel photography.
- Video recording, fast autofocus accuracy on faces, and high ISO performance matter.
- You prefer a high-quality fixed lens instead of juggling multiple lenses.
- You can invest in a premium camera for exceptional results.
Final Verdict
The Samsung GX-20 and Sony RX1R stand for different ideals in photography instruments. The GX-20 echoes the DSLR tradition of control, durability, and system expansion at a friendly price point, with solid if somewhat dated image quality. The RX1R offers stellar image quality in a pocket-sized package, yet demands intentional shooting and a heavier investment.
In practical terms, if you want the freedom to experiment with lenses and prefer physical controls with an optical viewfinder, the GX-20 will delight. If you crave exceptional image quality on the go, often in discretionary shooting scenarios or high-end portraits - and video is a bonus - the RX1R will serve as your trusted companion.
Whichever you choose, understanding their strengths and limitations ensures your toolkit aligns with your photographic voice.
Your next step? Try both if possible. Handling and use case matter as much as specs. Photography is about connection - not just pixels.
May your next camera inspire many unforgettable frames.
For more hands-on review insights and sample images, check out my detailed video reviews linked above! Feel free to ask any questions in the comments.
Samsung GX-20 vs Sony RX1R Specifications
Samsung GX-20 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Samsung | Sony |
Model type | Samsung GX-20 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Large Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2008-01-24 | 2013-06-26 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 23.4 x 15.6mm | 35.8 x 23.9mm |
Sensor area | 365.0mm² | 855.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 15 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4688 x 3120 | 6000 x 4000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 11 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Pentax KAF2 | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 35mm (1x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.0 |
Amount of lenses | 151 | - |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 1,229 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | - | Xtra FineTFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | Electronic and Optical (optional) |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.64x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 6.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Sync, Wireless |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 25, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 800 gr (1.76 pounds) | 482 gr (1.06 pounds) |
Dimensions | 142 x 101 x 72mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") | 113 x 65 x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 68 | 91 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.1 | 25.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.2 | 13.6 |
DXO Low light rating | 714 | 2537 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 270 photographs |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/MMC/SDHC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $850 | $2,798 |