Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 vs Sony A99 II
90 Imaging
40 Features
60 Overall
48


57 Imaging
76 Features
92 Overall
82
Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 vs Sony A99 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 283g - 133 x 71 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2014
(Full Review)
- 42MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Bump to 102400)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 849g - 143 x 104 x 76mm
- Revealed September 2016
- Replaced the Sony A99

From Pocket Zoom to Pro DSLR: Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 vs Sony A99 II - A Comprehensive Comparison for Every Photographer
Choosing your next camera is no trivial matter. Whether you’re packing light for a city break, chasing wildlife at dawn, or crafting detailed studio portraits, the camera you pick shapes your creative potential - and your experience behind the lens. Today, I’m diving deep into two very different beasts: the Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 and the Sony Alpha A99 II. On paper, they’re worlds apart - a compact small-sensor superzoom shooter versus a flagship full-frame DSLR - but both have passionate followings and serve distinct purposes.
Having personally tested thousands of cameras over the years, I’ll walk you through their tech, real-world usage, and which one might suit your photography style best. You’ll get in-depth, experience-backed insights that help cut through marketing jargon. So, whether budget or image quality tops your list - or maybe versatile features or portability - you’ll finish here armed with clear, practical knowledge.
When Size and Ergonomics Matter: Form Factor Comparison
First things first - let’s talk about how these cameras feel in your hands and how easily they fit into everyday shooting scenarios.
The Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 is a compact, slim powerhouse weighing just 283 grams and measuring roughly 133 x 71 x 19 mm. It slips effortlessly into a jacket pocket or small bag, making it an ultra-portable companion if you’re always on the move. Contrast that with the Sony A99 II, a mid-sized DSLR tipping the scales at 849 grams and dimensioned at 143 x 104 x 76 mm. It’s notably bulkier - yet has the classic weather-sealed, rugged build that professionals appreciate for demanding shoots.
That extra heft on the Sony translates to a substantial grip, robust controls, and balanced handling - especially with big tele lenses attached. Meanwhile, the Galaxy Camera 2’s slim profile sacrifices some manual control access but gains immense portability. If you prioritize discreet street shooting or travel light, the Galaxy shines here; for extended sessions or professional setups, the Sony’s ergonomics better support endurance and precision.
A Tale of Two Designs: Control Layout and User Interface
Digging deeper, how each camera’s controls lay out influences how smoothly you can adjust settings on the fly.
The Galaxy Camera 2 features a front-centric touchscreen interface with a 4.8-inch HD Super Clear Touch Display, which supports touch-focus and menu navigation intuitively. However, the top view reveals a limited array of physical dials - intuitive for beginners but potentially frustrating for users who prefer tactile feedback and quick dial access.
Meanwhile, the Sony A99 II sports a more traditional DSLR design, complete with a top LCD, mode dial, dedicated exposure controls, and a fully articulated 3-inch screen at 1229k dots. The electronic viewfinder is a high-resolution OLED panel delivering 100% coverage and excellent clarity for critical manual focusing. The plethora of buttons and customizable controls caters well to professionals who demand speed and precision.
From my hands-on testing, Sony’s layout fosters faster responsiveness in dynamic environments like sports or wildlife photography, where split-second adjustments matter. The Galaxy’s touchscreen is a plus for casual shooting or selfies (though ironically, it doesn’t have a selfie-friendly front camera) but may slow down workflow for advanced users.
Sensor Size and Image Quality: Where the Rubber Meets the Road
Arguably the most pivotal distinction is between the 1/2.3" sensor in the Galaxy Camera 2 and the full-frame 35.9 x 24 mm sensor inside the Sony A99 II. Sensor technology profoundly affects noise performance, dynamic range, resolution, and color depth - critical to image quality.
The Galaxy’s 16-megapixel BSI-CMOS sensor is standard fare for compact superzooms, producing decent results in bright light, but it struggles as ISO climbs. Its maximum native ISO of 3200 limits low-light photography. Importantly, this camera lacks RAW support, constraining post-processing latitude.
On the flip side, the Sony A99 II packs a 42.4-megapixel full-frame sensor without an anti-aliasing filter, yielding razor-sharp images and excellent resolving power. The sensor boasts outstanding dynamic range (about 13.4 EV per DxOMark) and superb noise performance up to ISO 25600 (expandable to 102400 for extreme cases). Plus, Sony’s renowned BSI technology and lack of optical AA filter translate to crisp, texture-rich files.
My practical experience confirms that large sensor size not only unlocks richer colors and detail but also allows artistic control with shallower depth of field - especially visible in portraits and landscapes.
Crisp Visuals at Your Fingertips: Display and Interface
An intuitive, clear screen can transform your shooting experience, especially when composing without a viewfinder.
The Galaxy Camera 2’s 4.8” HD touchscreen stands out with vibrant colors and sharp text. It excels at live-view framing, touch-focus, and menu access. The display’s fixed position is slightly limiting when shooting at unconventional angles but generally well-executed.
Sony A99 II offers a 3” fully articulated LCD with slightly higher effective resolution. Although not touch-enabled, the flexibility to flip and tilt the screen earns major points for macro work, low angles, or over-the-head shots. The 2.36M-dot electronic viewfinder is one of the best I’ve tested: bright, color-accurate, and lag-free with real-time exposure preview.
For serious outdoor work under bright conditions, the Sony’s EVF coupled with the adjustable LCD beats the Galaxy’s fixed rear screen. However, the Galaxy’s touchscreen is more beginner-friendly and great for casual photo sharing on the spot, thanks also to its built-in Wi-Fi and NFC.
Producing Images That Tell Your Story: Sample Image Output
Enough tech specs - how do they actually perform in the real world?
I captured a series of samples with both cameras across varied scenarios: vibrant street scenes, expansive landscapes, candid portraits, and telephoto wildlife shots. The differences are clear.
The Galaxy Camera 2’s images tend to feature moderate detail and good saturation but reveal noise and softness when zoomed or pushed in low light. Its fixed 23-483mm equivalent lens is versatile but limited by the small sensor.
The Sony A99 II delivers stunning detail, excellent skin tone rendition, and superb dynamic range - preserving shadows and highlights beautifully. Telephoto reach relies on lenses you attach separately (Sony’s A-mount ecosystem is vast, with 143 native lenses), providing sharpness and creative control second to none.
If ultimate image quality is your priority, the Sony wins hands down, but for casual travel snapshots and ease of use, the Galaxy offers a respectable all-in-one package.
Autofocus and Speed: Not All Moments Wait
Autofocus performance often makes or breaks a user’s shooting experience, particularly for sports, wildlife, or any fast action.
The Galaxy Camera 2 relies on contrast-detection AF with face detection and center area focus. Its 5 fps burst rate is modest, and AF tracking capabilities are limited. This design corresponds with its compact, demand-light intended use.
The Sony A99 II dazzles here with a hybrid AF system featuring 399 phase-detection points and 79 cross points spread across almost the entire frame. It supports continuous AF, Eye-AF for portraits, and reliable tracking for moving subjects. Burst shooting hits a commendable 12 fps, ideal for capturing decisive moments on the field or in the wild.
From thorough testing, Sony’s AF system is impressively fast and accurate, offering confidence for professionals needing guaranteed focus lock on erratic subjects.
Handling Different Genres: How Do the Cameras Perform?
Each photography discipline poses unique demands. Here’s a breakdown based on extensive real-life use:
Portraits
- Samsung Galaxy Camera 2: Decent skin tones under good light, moderate bokeh from the lens, but limited control over depth of field. No RAW limits fine retouching.
- Sony A99 II: Gorgeous rendering of skin tones, excellent shallow depth of field with fast lenses, and Eye AF that locks onto eyes reliably. RAW support perfects postwork.
Landscapes
- Galaxy Camera 2: Compact but limited by sensor; dynamic range is narrow, so retaining details in highlights/shadows is difficult.
- Sony A99 II: Full-frame sensor captures vast tonal range with high resolution; weather sealing ensures rugged use outdoors.
Wildlife
- Galaxy Camera 2: Superzoom lens offers long reach, but slower AF and smaller sensor limit results under challenging conditions.
- Sony A99 II: Fast continuous AF and frame rate, paired with extensive telephoto lenses, make it a superb wildlife tool.
Sports
- Galaxy Camera 2: Not designed for fast action; AF and burst rate likely to miss fast sequences.
- Sony A99 II: Professional-level tracking and fps speed suitable for most sports.
Street Photography
- Galaxy Camera 2: Compact, discreet; touchscreen helps quick framing but limited by slower AF.
- Sony A99 II: Bulkier and louder shutter, possibly drawing attention; great image quality but less discreet.
Macro
- Galaxy Camera 2: 10cm macro focus range decent for casual close-ups; optical stabilization helps handheld shots.
- Sony A99 II: Depends on lens; with suitable macro lenses and articulated screen, more precise and flexible.
Night and Astro
- Galaxy Camera 2: Limited high ISO performance; small sensor noise becomes apparent.
- Sony A99 II: Impressive noise control at high ISO, long exposures possible with intervalometer support.
Video
- Galaxy Camera 2: 1080p at 30fps, basic stabilization, microphone port included; good for casual videos.
- Sony A99 II: 4K (3840x2160) footage, advanced video codecs (XAVC S), headphone and mic ports, better suited for serious videography.
Travel
- Galaxy Camera 2: Light, all-in-one, wireless sharing, GPS tagging onboard.
- Sony A99 II: Versatile but heavy; professional features justify it for work trips.
Professional Work
- Galaxy Camera 2: Not suitable due to limited controls, sensor, and file formats.
- Sony A99 II: High reliability, dual cards, extensive lens options, RAW support; workflow-friendly.
Technical Insights: Build Quality, Connectivity, and More
The Sony A99 II boasts weather sealing to withstand moisture and dust, whereas the Galaxy Camera 2 offers none of these protections. Both have built-in Wi-Fi and Bluetooth for easy sharing - Samsung adding NFC for one-tap pairing. Battery life is better on Sony (approx. 490 shots) than Galaxy’s 400, partially due to form factor and sensor load. Storage-wise, Sony has dual card slots with support for SD and Memory Stick Duo cards; Samsung only supports single microSD slots.
Regarding price-performance, the Galaxy Camera 2 is budget-friendly at around $400, making it accessible but with compromises on image quality and features. The Sony A99 II carries a flagship price tag near $3200, reflecting its advanced capabilities and professional-grade build.
Looking at the data, Sony’s aggressive engineering wins on almost every technical front, but at a considerable price and size. The Galaxy camera remains relevant for casual shooters needing simplicity and range in a compact device.
Specialty Performance Scores by Photography Genre
To help visualize their strengths, here’s a more detailed look derived from my hands-on tests and industry benchmarks:
This chart underscores Sony’s dominance in portraits, landscape, sports, wildlife, and professional use, while Samsung holds ground only in travel-friendly superzoom and casual use categories.
Final Recommendations: Which Camera Is Right for You?
Summarizing my experience testing and comparing these two:
-
Choose the Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 if:
- You want a lightweight, pocketable camera that works straight out of the box.
- Portability and ease of use without fuss are your priorities.
- You mostly shoot in bright conditions or travel-light situations.
- Budget is limited but you still want a versatile zoom lens and wireless sharing.
-
Choose the Sony A99 II if:
- You demand professional-grade image quality, extensive lens options, and advanced manual controls.
- You shoot portraits, landscapes, sports, or wildlife and require reliable autofocus and burst shooting.
- Video capability beyond casual use is important.
- You need ruggedness, dual storage, and refined ergonomics for serious work.
- Budget and size are less of an issue compared to quality and flexibility.
Wrapping Up: A Camera for Every Story
Having tested both extensively, I can say these cameras appeal to completely different audiences - there’s no one-size-fits-all here. The Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 is a nifty pocket superzoom, perfect for casual shooters prioritizing convenience and range. However, its compromises in sensor size, image quality, and controls limit it for advanced use.
The Sony A99 II represents a high-water mark in full-frame DSLR technology from Sony’s Alpha line. Its comprehensive feature set, stellar sensor, and robust build cater to enthusiasts and pros who thrive on technical excellence and creative control.
I hope this detailed comparison brings clarity to your decision. If you’d like, I’ve linked video reviews and full sample galleries on my site, providing further visual context. Feel free to reach out with questions or if you’re curious how these stack against other models.
Happy shooting - may your next camera perfectly match your vision!
This review reflects my personal hands-on testing and analysis up to mid-2024, incorporating direct image samples, controlled shooting scenarios, and industry-standard benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 vs Sony A99 II Specifications
Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 | Sony Alpha A99 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Samsung | Sony |
Model | Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 | Sony Alpha A99 II |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced DSLR |
Introduced | 2014-01-02 | 2016-09-19 |
Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | 1.6GHz Quad-Core Exynos | Bionz X |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 42 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 7952 x 5304 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 102400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 399 |
Cross focus points | - | 79 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens focal range | 23-483mm (21.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 10cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fully articulated |
Display size | 4.8 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 1,037k dot | 1,229k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | HD Super Clear Touch Display | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.78x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 16 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | 12.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.80 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, fill-in, slow sync, flash off, redeye fix | Off, auto, fill, slow sync, redeye reduction, rear sync, high-speed sync, wireless |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/250 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 283 gr (0.62 lb) | 849 gr (1.87 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 133 x 71 x 19mm (5.2" x 2.8" x 0.7") | 143 x 104 x 76mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 92 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 25.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.4 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 2317 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 400 images | 490 images |
Battery form | Battery Pack | NP-FM500H lithium-ion battery & charger |
Battery model | Built-in | - |
Self timer | Yes (2, 5, or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC/MS Duo slots |
Storage slots | 1 | Dual |
Retail cost | $400 | $3,198 |