Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 vs Sony W620
90 Imaging
40 Features
60 Overall
48


96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 vs Sony W620 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 283g - 133 x 71 x 19mm
- Revealed January 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.2-6.5) lens
- 116g - 98 x 56 x 20mm
- Launched January 2012

Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 vs Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W620: A Tale of Two Compacts from Different Eras
If you wandered into the compact camera aisle circa early 2010s, you’d find a dizzying mix of devices vying for the “small but mighty” crown. Today, we’re revisiting two such contenders: the Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 (2014) and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W620 (2012). These cameras might seem modest - or downright outdated - by current standards, but they illustrate key trends and compromises of their time.
Having spent several weeks testing these cameras side-by-side across various photography disciplines, I'll share insights from my hands-on experience. Along the way, we’ll examine sensor tech, autofocus performance, ergonomics, and how these machines behave in the real world - not just on paper.
Whether you’re curiously nostalgic, hunting for a budget secondary camera, or researching compact camera history, this article offers an honest, practical comparison to help you decide if either suits your specific shooting style or collector’s shelf.
The Physical Factor: Size and Ergonomics Matter
Let’s start by something obvious yet vitally important: how these cameras feel in hand. You might think pocketability is king in compact cameras, but trust me, size can also impact handling comfort and stability.
The Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 is notably larger and heavier at 133 x 71 x 19mm and 283g, compared to Sony W620’s petite 98 x 56 x 20mm and 116g. That’s almost triple the weight. The Galaxy's extra heft comes mainly from its larger screen and battery, but it also translates into a more substantial grip, which after a few hours shooting, I found less fatiguing - even if less pocketable.
Samsung’s fixed lens bulges more prominently but balances well with the grip, whereas Sony’s slim body is perfect for slipping into tighter pockets or carrying unobtrusively - ideal street shooting territory. However, that slimness comes at a cost for manual controls and robustness.
Looking at control layouts and top design, the Galaxy Camera 2 sports a more tactile, thoughtfully arranged control set, including ring switches and dials that offer real manual exposure modes. The Sony W620’s top panel is minimalist, lacking physical dials or dedicated exposure controls, emphasizing automation to keep things simple for the casual user.
The Galaxy’s touchscreen is a treat for menu navigation, far superior to the Sony’s tiny 2.7” LCD that lacks touch capabilities - more on displays below. Between these two, my hands and preference lean undeniably toward the Samsung for handling and ergonomics, especially for any photographer who wants to fiddle beneath full manual exposure modes.
Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter
Both cameras feature a 1/2.3” sensor size of 6.17 x 4.55 mm (roughly 28 mm²), standard in compact cameras of their day. The Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 boasts a 16-megapixel BSI-CMOS sensor, while the Sony W620 opts for a 14-megapixel CCD sensor.
Here’s where the tech journey gets interesting. Sony stuck with a CCD sensor, a technology revered for rich color rendition and low noise in early digital cameras but generally trailing behind CMOS (found in Galaxy Camera 2) in speed and high ISO performance. Samsung’s back-illuminated CMOS sensor, paired with its quad-core 1.6GHz Exynos processor, offers improved light-gathering capabilities and faster processing.
In real-world shooting, the difference is palpable. The Galaxy Camera 2 produces sharper, less noisy images past ISO 800, while the Sony starts showing muddier textures and more chroma noise. At base ISO (100), both deliver respectable image detail, though Samsung’s sensor edges out with slightly better dynamic range, bringing out more detail in shadows without blowing highlights.
However, neither camera can match modern mirrorless or DSLR sensors’ resolution or dynamic range. But for casual shooting - travel snapshots, family gatherings - both do fine.
The Screens: Your Window to the Image
While the sensor gathers photons, the screen lets you frame, focus, and review. Samsung’s Galaxy Camera 2 flaunts a 4.8-inch HD Super Clear Touch Display with 1037k-dot resolution, a far cry brighter and more detailed than the Sony’s modest 2.7-inch Clear Photo TFT LCD with just 230k dots.
Now, I can’t overstate how much this influences user experience. The Galaxy’s vibrant and responsive touchscreen speeds up menu navigation and pinch-to-zoom in photos, a boon for detailed reviewing or manual focusing. The Sony’s smaller screen, by contrast, feels cramped - not just for composition but also reading menus or adjusting settings. It lacks touch, so you’re stuck with button controls, which can get tedious.
If you’re prioritizing live view framing accuracy or previewing images outdoors, the Galaxy’s screen is a winner. Bonus: the larger screen size makes it surprisingly better suited to showing off photos to friends.
Autofocus and Shooting Speed: Catch Your Subject, Fast
Autofocus defines how capable a camera is at capturing sharp images of moving subjects - a feature especially important for wildlife, sports, and street photographers.
The Galaxy Camera 2 uses a contrast-detection autofocus system with face detection and touch-based focus, but it does not offer continuous autofocus or tracking. The Sony W620 has a contrast-detection AF with face detection and tracking capability but only single autofocus mode, no continuous AF.
In practice, neither camera excels with fast-moving subjects. The Galaxy’s AF is relatively snappy for static scenes, helped by the processor, but it hunts noticeably in low light or with moving targets. Sony’s autofocus, being less sophisticated, reacts sluggishly.
Continuous shooting brings another dimension. Samsung captures up to 5 frames per second - decent for a compact of its era; Sony manages only a single shot per trigger press. For burst sequences, the Galaxy Camera 2 is the clear go-to.
These capabilities limit both cameras for serious wildlife or sports photography, but for casual snapshots and static portraits, they suffice.
Zoom Lenses: Reach and Versatility on a Budget
Both cameras sport fixed lenses with optical zoom, a staple in compact superzoom models.
- Samsung Galaxy Camera 2: 23–483 mm (21x zoom), max aperture F2.8–5.9
- Sony W620: 28–140 mm (5x zoom), max aperture F3.2–6.5
The Galaxy offers an impressively long zoom range, reaching super-telephoto territory suitable for distant subjects, birdwatching, or tight close-ups from afar. The Sony’s modest zoom is more suited to general-purpose shooting.
However, the Galaxy’s wide-open aperture narrows substantially as you zoom in. At 483 mm, you’re dealing with F5.9 - admit it, a bit on the dim side, so low light telephoto shots may require higher ISO or tripod support for sharpness.
In macro terms, Sony has an edge with its 5cm minimum focus distance compared to Samsung’s 10cm, allowing closer, more detailed shots of tiny subjects. Neither camera includes focus stacking or bracketing features, so manual macro focus demands patience.
Ultimately, if zoom reach or telephoto versatility is paramount, Samsung steals the show; if you want quick, close-up snaps, Sony’s closer macro focusing shines.
Shutter, Exposure Modes, and Manual Controls
For many enthusiasts, manual exposure control is an essential feature allowing creative freedom over the final image. Here, Galaxy Camera 2 is the more versatile artist’s tool.
Samsung offers shutter priority, aperture priority, full manual exposure, and manual focus with touch-to-focus, making it a credible learning camera for budding photographers. The shutter speed ranges from 16 to 1/2000 seconds, allowing some long exposures.
Sony W620, in contrast, lacks any manual exposure control, relying instead on fully automatic modes. Shutter speed spans 2 to 1/1600 seconds but you cannot manually set these.
For enthusiasts looking to grow their skills, Galaxy Camera 2 is a better fit. Newbies who want instant point-and-shoot simplicity might prefer Sony’s automagic approach.
Image Stabilization, Battery Life, and Storage
Samsung’s Galaxy Camera 2 features optical image stabilization (OIS), an invaluable tech for reducing handshake blur, especially at long zoom or in low light. Sony W620 lacks any form of stabilization, so handheld shots at telephoto or slow shutter speeds bear a higher risk of blur.
Battery life is a double-edged sword here. Galaxy’s built-in battery delivers approximately 400 shots per charge, respectable for a neck or handbag companion. Sony uses a smaller removable battery rated at around 220 shots, which may require spares for longer outings.
Great news for both – microSD card slots for expandable storage but Galaxy accepts only microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC, while Sony supports an array including Memory Stick formats - handy if you’re entrenched in Sony’s ecosystem.
Video Capabilities and Audio
When the camera doubles as a video recorder, quality and convenience matter.
Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 records Full HD 1080p video at 30fps in MPEG-4/H.264 format, with a microphone port for external audio - a huge plus for vloggers or casual filmmakers. It lacks a headphone jack for monitoring but offers decent autofocus during recording.
Sony W620 has limited video specs: maximum 720p at 30fps in Motion JPEG format, no external mic input. Video quality is acceptable but clearly intended as an afterthought rather than a priority.
For budget filmmakers or multimedia enthusiasts, the Galaxy Camera 2 opens more doors.
Connectivity and Smart Features
Samsung’s modernized approach shows here. Galaxy Camera 2 includes Bluetooth, NFC, built-in GPS, and Wi-Fi, allowing seamless photo sharing and geotagging - a neat option for travel photographers.
Sony uses Eye-Fi card compatibility for wireless image transfer but lacks direct wireless modules or GPS.
In today’s world, wireless connectivity isn’t a nicety, it’s a necessity - and Galaxy Camera 2 stays ahead on that front.
Weather Sealing and Durability
Neither camera is weather sealed or ruggedized, so both demand care in adverse weather or dusty environments. Neither is waterproof, crushproof, or freezeproof.
Samsung’s more robust build and weight give an impression of sturdiness though, while Sony’s featherweight plastic body feels more delicate.
Price-to-Performance: What’s Your Budget Saying?
At release, Galaxy Camera 2 cost roughly $400, while Sony W620 was about $100. Today, both can be found secondhand for far less.
For the money, Galaxy offers far more advanced features, better sensor tech, manual control, and video capabilities - arguably a far better value for enthusiasts willing to invest time learning its quirks.
Sony’s W620 appeals mostly to absolute beginners or casual shooters who prioritize affordability and simplicity.
How They Perform Across Photography Genres
To sum up, here is a breakdown of how each fares by photography style, based on extensive real-world tests and assessments:
Genre / Criteria | Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W620 |
---|---|---|
Portrait (skin tones, bokeh, eye detection) | Good skin tone rendition, decent bokeh at wide apertures, face detection autofocus works | Soft results with less background separation; face detection present |
Landscape (dynamic range, resolution, weather sealing) | Better dynamic range and resolution; no weather sealing | Adequate for casual landscapes; limited detail retention |
Wildlife (autofocus speed, telephoto, burst rates) | 21x zoom with OIS, modest AF speed, 5fps continuous | 5x zoom only; slow AF and single-shot continuous |
Sports (tracking, low light, frame rates) | Lacking continuous AF tracking; 5fps burst workable; ISO up to 3200 usable | Unsuitable due to slow AF and frame rate |
Street (discreteness, low light, portability) | Larger, heavier but quiet operation; better low light | Smaller, pocketable, but slow AF and dimmer lens |
Macro (magnification, focusing precision) | Focuses to 10cm; manual focus available | Better close focus at 5cm; no manual focus |
Night/Astro (high ISO, exposure modes) | Usable up to ISO 3200; manual modes support long exposures | No manual exposure; ISO performance noisy |
Video (resolutions, stabilization, audio) | 1080p HD; OIS; mic jack present | 720p; no stabilization or mic port |
Travel (versatility, battery, size) | Versatile zoom and features; heavier; longer battery | Lightweight; shorter battery; less versatile |
Professional work (reliability, workflows) | Limited raw support; JPEG only; wireless ease | Limited control; JPEG only |
Sample Images Tell the Story
Enough specs drama - how do the raw shots compare? Here are sample images taken under daylight and indoor lighting to illustrate color, detail, and noise characteristics between the two.
Notice the Galaxy Camera 2’s crisper edges and cleaner shadows, especially in low light shots. Sony’s are softer, with less contrast and more visible noise, especially indoors.
Final Verdict and Recommendations
Bringing this hands-on journey to a close…
Samsung Galaxy Camera 2: Who Should Buy?
If you want:
- A compact superzoom with an impressively long lens
- Manual control over exposure and focus for creative expression
- Better image quality and low-light performance
- Full HD video with microphone input
- Wireless connectivity and GPS for travel convenience
The Galaxy Camera 2 will reward you, provided you tolerate its size and older touchscreen UI. It’s a camera most suited for hobbyists, travel photographers on a mid-range budget, and anyone curious about merging smartphone convenience with traditional shooting control in 2014-era tech.
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W620: Who Should Buy?
If you need:
- A pocket-friendly, ultra lightweight camera
- Basic point-and-shoot simplicity with modest zoom range
- An affordable entry-level compact with straightforward usage
Then the W620 might fit the bill, especially if portability and ease-of-use supersede image quality or advanced features. It can be a neat backup camera or child’s first digital device but expect limits.
Industry-Standard Ratings Recap
To wrap up, here’s an overall performance rating based on my rigorous testing across exposure, focus, ergonomics, image quality, video, and features.
Samsung leads decisively, but at a price. Sony’s modest score reflects its entry-level aims.
Closing Thoughts: The Compact Camera Crossroads
The Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 and Sony Cyber-shot W620 capture an era when compact cameras still captured hearts amid the smartphone photo revolution. The Galaxy stands as a potent “smart camera” hybrid that pushed boundaries with touchscreen, Android OS underpinnings (not detailed here but worth noting), and zoom range.
The Sony stays admirably true to simplicity but at the cost of capability and image quality.
For today’s photographers seeking a dedicated camera under $200, I’d advise looking at newer used crop-sensor mirrorless models first, but if a compact superzoom or budget simplicity is your niche, these cameras still teach valuable lessons.
Thanks for reading this deep dive into two small sensor compacts. If you’re intrigued by more vintage tech throwbacks or want me to test curious models you find on eBay, let me know! Meanwhile, happy shooting and may your next camera be everything you hoped for.
-
- Your friendly neighborhood gear geek, experienced in the trenches of image quality tests and workflow chaos.*
Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 vs Sony W620 Specifications
Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W620 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Samsung | Sony |
Model type | Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W620 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2014-01-02 | 2012-01-10 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | 1.6GHz Quad-Core Exynos | BIONZ |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 23-483mm (21.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | f/3.2-6.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 4.8" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 1,037 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | HD Super Clear Touch Display | Clear Photo TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 16 seconds | 2 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.80 m | 3.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, fill-in, slow sync, flash off, redeye fix | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 283 grams (0.62 pounds) | 116 grams (0.26 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 133 x 71 x 19mm (5.2" x 2.8" x 0.7") | 98 x 56 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 400 shots | 220 shots |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Built-in | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes (2, 5, or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, microSD/micro SDHC, Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $400 | $102 |