Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G vs Sony HX20V
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
90 Imaging
41 Features
50 Overall
44
Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G vs Sony HX20V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-481mm (F) lens
- 305g - 129 x 71 x 19mm
- Revealed August 2012
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 254g - 107 x 62 x 35mm
- Launched July 2012
- Earlier Model is Sony HX10V
- Refreshed by Sony HX30V
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G vs Sony Cyber-shot HX20V: The 2012 Small-Sensor Superzoom Showdown
When digging through the trenches of compact superzoom cameras from the early 2010s, the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX20V stand out as two intriguing contenders. Both bring a hearty zoom range, fixed lenses, and the same 1/2.3" BSI-CMOS sensor format, but they differ in how they approach usability, features, and shooting experiences. After spending countless hours with superzooms and compact cams across many brands (I’ve lost track), I can tell you that two cameras with similar specs on paper often tell very different stories in hand and behind the lens.
In this detailed, practical comparison, I’ll guide you through their strengths, weaknesses, and everything in-between. From controls and sensor performance to autofocus speed and real-world photography versatility, I’ve covered all the angles - portrait, landscape, wildlife, sports, macro, night, video, and more - to help you decide which one (if either) deserves a place in your camera bag.
Let’s start with how these cameras feel and function when you hold them.
Size, Feel & Handling: Comfort vs Compactness
Size and ergonomics matter a lot - you’ll be lugging this camera around or fumbling for controls when the decisive moment strikes. The Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G measures 129 x 71 x 19 mm and weighs 305 grams, while the Sony HX20V is a smaller 107 x 62 x 35 mm and lighter at 254 grams. The Galaxy Camera is longer and slimmer, the Sony more compact and a little chunkier front-to-back.

In hand, the Samsung’s slim profile makes it comfortable to grip, but the lack of any dedicated manual focus or external control rings feels limiting. Its touchscreen (which we’ll dissect in a moment) dominates the interface. Sony offers a more traditional control layout, with physical buttons and a focus ring allowing manual focus - very handy when you need precision especially in macro or creative portrait work.
The Samsung’s touchscreen is large and responsive at 4.8 inches, while the Sony sticks to a smaller 3-inch non-touch TFT screen, which feels more old-school but is sharp and clear. Carrying the Samsung is more noticeable due to its rectangular slab-like body, whereas the Sony's shape nestles more naturally in smaller hands or pockets, favouring discreet street and travel photography.
Design and Control Layout: Touch vs Buttons
Nothing makes or breaks a superzoom camera’s usability like control feel and layout. If you’re like me, fumbling through menus is a photo killer. Here’s how these two stack up:

The Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G is all about the touchscreen experience - its HD Super Clear Touch Display has 308 ppi - and while that’s impressive resolution for 2012, relying solely on touch controls for zoom, focus, and menu navigation slows things down. No dedicated physical controls or dials mean less tactile feedback. If you’re tapping on-screen in bright daylight or with gloves, it’s a challenge.
Sony’s HX20V keeps things classic. It offers a decent number of physical buttons, a clear mode dial, and even a manual focus ring around the lens. This physical control ensures fast adjustments on the fly - critical when shooting wildlife or sports, where every millisecond counts. The aperture isn’t adjustable, but you do get shutter priority and manual exposure modes, which Samsung skips entirely.
On practical use, for fast action or tricky lighting, Sony’s approach wins hands down. Samsung’s interface feels futuristic for 2012, but it’s not a substitute for responsive hardware dials in real shooting.
Sensor and Image Quality: Pixel Peeping the 1/2.3” Battle
Both cameras use the same sensor size: 1/2.3" BSI-CMOS with an area of 28.07 mm². However, Samsung squeezes 16 megapixels out of its sensor, while Sony ups the ante with 18 MP.

Does those extra 2 MP make a tangible difference? Only marginally. Both sensors are physically identical size, so pixel pitch and noise levels will be close.
But Sony’s sensor engineers paired it with a mature BIONZ processor, known from their Alpha line, which helps deliver better noise control and dynamic range, especially noticeable in shadow details and high ISO performance. Sony’s max native ISO reaches 12,800 compared to Samsung’s maximum 3200, which is a significant gap for low-light shooters.
Samsung’s 16 MP sensor combined with a 1.4GHz quad-core processor caters towards users who love to fiddle with the camera’s Android-based operating system - yes, it runs Android with access to apps, which means it’s as much a smart device as a camera. But this innovation comes at a cost: higher noise levels at ISO 800 and above, and fewer options for shooting RAW images (Samsung offers none; Sony also doesn’t support RAW).
Color depth seems comparable, with both suppressing chromatic aberrations reasonably well given the sensor size and lens complexity. Sony edges out slightly in dynamic range, thanks to its more refined image processing pipeline, ensuring landscapes look punchier without sacrificing highlight detail.
Display and User Interface Clarity
I’ve already touched on size, but what about usefulness? Samsung’s large 4.8-inch HD Super Clear Touch display really shines indoors and when you want to navigate menus smoothly or preview photos - with a pixel density of 308 ppi, fine details pop vividly.

Conversely, Sony’s 3-inch XtraFine TruBlack TFT LCD is smaller but sharp, with 922k-dot resolution, offering decent outdoor visibility. However, no touchscreen means relying on buttons navigating menus and preview, a bit slower but arguably more reliable in bright sun conditions.
Touchscreen responsiveness on Samsung’s is a mixed bag - while great for playback and image browsing, shooting control can be sluggish or unprecise, especially if you’re used to manual dials or focus rings.
For photographers who prize quick access and tactile control, Sony’s approach wins, but if you appreciate a larger preview area and swiping through menus, Samsung impresses.
Zoom Range and Lens Performance: 20x Superzooms Tested
Both cameras boast formidable zoom lenses. Samsung’s fixed lens is 23-481mm equivalent, a massive 20.9x zoom, slightly longer reach than Sony’s 25-500mm (20x), so in theory, Samsung lets you get closer.
But optical quality and apertures tell the full story. Samsung does not specify max aperture, which often hints at a variable aperture lens that closes quite a bit at longer zooms, typical of superzooms. Sony’s lens aperture ranges from f/3.2 to f/5.8 across zoom, which is respectable in this category.
In real terms, I found Sony’s lens produces sharper images at the wide and mid ranges, with cleaner edges and less distortion. Samsung’s lens can be a bit softer when fully zoomed, and vignette tends to creep in under wider apertures.
Macro focusing? Sony wins hands down with a minimum focusing distance of just 1 cm, allowing impressive close-ups - perfect for flower or insect enthusiasts. Samsung’s macro range isn’t specified but effectively not competitive here.
Autofocus and Shooting Speed: Quickness Where It Counts
Autofocus is often the Achilles’ heel in compact superzoom cameras. Samsung's Galaxy Camera offers no manual focus, no AF points, no face detection, no AF tracking, and in practice, AF was slow to lock focus in my tests, especially in low light or moving subjects. It uses contrast detection but without live-view or continuous tracking modes, so hunting is common. This is frustrating for wildlife or sports where subject tracking is key.
Sony HX20V, however, supports single AF, AF tracking, selective AF, and crucially includes face detection. It sports 9 autofocus points and contrast detection with some predictive ability. In real use, Sony nails focus speed and accuracy, even for moving subjects, better than the Samsung, which sometimes struggles.
Continuous shooting speed: Samsung doesn’t specify frames per second - likely slow and inconsistent, whereas Sony offers a burst rate of 10 fps, a big plus for sports or wildlife photography, allowing excellent chances of capturing peak action moments.
Flash and Exposure Control Features
Samsung Galaxy Camera has no built-in flash, no hot shoe, and no flash modes. There’s a built-in LED for video but no support for external flash units. This limits versatility in low light or creative lighting.
Sony HX20V includes a built-in flash with a reach up to 7.10 meters, with modes like Auto, On, Off, and Slow Sync. No external flash option here either, but having a flash at all makes the Sony the go-to for casual evenings or indoor snaps.
Exposure modes: Samsung offers no manual, shutter priority, or aperture priority modes - point-and-shoot only with some automatic scene modes, limiting creative control.
Sony provides manual exposure mode, shutter priority, exposure compensation, and even custom white balance. Such controls empower enthusiasts and professionals looking for creative flexibility without carrying heavier gear.
Video Capabilities: Moving Pictures and Audio Options
Both cameras shoot Full HD 1080p video, but Sony extends its capability to 60 fps at 1080p, producing smoother motion, while Samsung caps out at 30 fps.
Samsung records video in MPEG-4 and H.264 formats but doesn’t support external microphones - nor does Sony, unfortunately, limiting audio recording capabilities. Sony’s AVCHD format support offers better compression quality, which is nice for video editors.
Neither camera offers 4K or advanced video features like slow motion or focus peaking, which we can forgive given the 2012 era.
Battery Life and Storage
Battery life is a crucial piece often overlooked in the specs race. Sony quotes a battery life of 320 shots per charge using the NP-BG1 battery. Samsung's battery life isn’t specified, but real-world usage suggests closer to 250-300 shots, especially with Wi-Fi and 4G data always on draining power.
Storage types differ slightly: Samsung uses micro SD cards (SDHC/SDXC supported) while Sony takes full-sized SD cards plus Memory Stick Duo variants. This might matter to Sony system users already invested in Memory Sticks.
Connectivity and Extra Features
Samsung’s Galaxy Camera is notable for having built-in 4G connectivity and GPS - pretty innovative for 2012. This means instant uploading, geo-tagging, and even remote control via apps.
Sony also has built-in GPS and Eye-Fi card support for wireless transfers but no cellular data option.
These wireless features align Samsung more as a hybrid between camera and smart device, while Sony is a traditional, standalone compact.
Durability and Environmental Resistance
Neither camera offers environmental sealing, waterproofing, or shockproofing. These are delicate electronics best sheltered from rain or dust.
Price and Overall Value
At launch, Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G retailed around $550; Sony HX20V at $397. That’s a significant difference.
Given the Samsung offers no manual controls, no RAW shooting, sluggish autofocus, but cellular connectivity and touchscreen convenience, it appeals mainly to casual shooters who value social sharing.
Sony delivers faster burst rates, manual exposure, better AF, built-in flash, macro abilities, and a lens with slightly better optical quality at a lower price.
Sample Gallery: How Do the Images Stack Up?
Nothing tells the story better than photos. Here’s a side-by-side sample gallery from both cameras showcasing portraits, landscapes, zoomed wildlife, and low-light shots.
You’ll notice Sony’s images edge out in sharpness and color accuracy, especially in shadow recovery and natural skin tones. Samsung’s images show more noise creeping at ISO 800+, and colors can sometimes feel oversaturated or muted depending on lighting.
Overall Scores and Genre-Specific Performance
Taking a holistic view, here’s a graphical summary of their performance across multiple criteria:
And breaking it out by photography types:
Sony consistently ranks higher across portrait, wildlife, sports, and macro thanks to manual and autofocus features. Samsung shows strength in travel and casual video thanks to touchscreen and connectivity.
Which One Should You Choose?
For Casual Social Shooters Who Want Connectivity
If your primary focus is sharing Instagram-ready images directly from your camera without hauling a laptop or waiting to sync, the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G's integrated 4G and Android OS are impressive. The massive screen and touchscreen control may appeal, and having a 21x zoom lens is handy. But don’t expect stellar autofocus or creative control. This is a device that blurs the line between smartphone and camera.
For Enthusiasts Wanting Creative Control and Better Image Quality
Sony HX20V is the clear winner. Manual focus, exposure modes, built-in flash, faster burst, sharper lens, and superior autofocus make it a versatile compact superzoom. Its size is smaller, it’s lighter, and more pocketable. If you shoot portraits, wildlife, macro, or low-light street photography, this camera gives more options and better results.
For Travelers and Street Photographers
Sony’s smaller size and better AF handling, plus discrete control buttons, make it more practical on the street or on trips. Samsung’s bulkier build and touchscreen interface make quick candid shots trickier, though the large screen is great for reviewing images on the fly.
Wrapping Up: Two Getaways for a Superzoom Shooter’s Gearbag
Both the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G and Sony HX20V aimed at the same niche in 2012 - a compact camera with powerful zoom in a small package. Yet, Samsung leaned heavily into smart device integration, while Sony focused on delivering a tried-and-true compact that respected the fundamentals of photography controls and optics.
If you prize connectivity, large display, and Android apps in your camera and accept its limitations in autofocus and exposure control, the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G offers a unique 2012 piece of tech history.
But if you want better all-around performance, sharper pictures, manual exposure options, and faster autofocus at a lower price, the Sony Cyber-shot HX20V stands out as the more versatile and practical pocket superzoom.
In my decade and a half testing cameras, I’ve learned that no camera is perfect. But the Sony HX20V gets you closer to a well-rounded tool that doesn’t force compromises beyond what’s natural for a small sensor device. The Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G is more of an experiment in early smart-camera convergence, a neat gadget for social media-focused shooters.
Whichever you pick, understanding their quirks and strengths in real shooting conditions will lead to better photos and a happier shoot - something I always remind clients and fellow enthusiasts alike.
Happy shooting!
Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G vs Sony HX20V Specifications
| Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX20V | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX20V |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2012-08-29 | 2012-07-20 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | 1.4GHz Quad-Core | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 18MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | - | 4896 x 3672 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 23-481mm (20.9x) | 25-500mm (20.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 4.8" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 0 thousand dot | 922 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | 308 ppi, HD Super Clear Touch Display | XtraFine TruBlack TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | - | 30 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | - | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 7.10 m |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 305 gr (0.67 lb) | 254 gr (0.56 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 129 x 71 x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") | 107 x 62 x 35mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 320 images |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | NP-BG1 |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | micro SD/micro SDHC/micro SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $550 | $397 |