Samsung Galaxy Camera vs Sigma DP2
90 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45


86 Imaging
43 Features
28 Overall
37
Samsung Galaxy Camera vs Sigma DP2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-481mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 300g - 129 x 71 x 19mm
- Announced February 2013
- Alternative Name is Wi-Fi
(Full Review)
- 5MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 320 x 240 video
- 41mm (F) lens
- 280g - 113 x 60 x 56mm
- Launched September 2009
- Refreshed by Sigma DP2s

A Tale of Two Cameras: Samsung Galaxy Camera vs. Sigma DP2 - Which One Fits Your Photography Style?
When comparing cameras that seem to serve similar purposes yet come from wildly different design philosophies, the devil is in the details - and that’s precisely what I found when putting the 2013 Samsung Galaxy Camera up against the 2009 Sigma DP2. Both are compact, fixed-lens cameras aimed at enthusiasts wanting more than smartphone snappers, yet each carves a unique niche in the realm of image-making. I’ve spent hands-on hours with both, scrutinizing everything from sensor performance to real-world shooting experience, so buckle up. By the end, you’ll know which camera deserves a place in your kit.
The Dimensional Showdown: Size, Shape, and Handling
Right off the bat, size and ergonomics profoundly influence how you use a camera day-to-day. The Samsung Galaxy Camera measures 129 x 71 x 19 mm and weighs in at 300 grams, sporting a sleek, slab-style compact form reminiscent of a large smartphone. By contrast, the Sigma DP2 feels chunkier, at 113 x 60 x 56 mm and weighing slightly less at 280 grams, reflecting its large sensor compact design with a pronounced grip and lens barrel.
From my time behind the controls, the Galaxy Camera’s thin profile and expansive 4.8-inch touchscreen (more on that later) make it feel almost familiar for Android users - portable enough for travel but somewhat challenging to hold steady for extended portrait sessions. Sigma’s DP2, with its robust thickness and contoured grip, offers a more camera-like feel; it nestles comfortably in hand, lending confidence for longer handheld shoots.
If you prioritize pocketability and touchscreen navigation, Samsung scores. But for better grip and traditional tactile operation, Sigma’s design edges ahead, infusing more of that classic camera experience into a compact body.
Peering from the Top: Control Layout and Usability
Handling isn’t just physical; it extends to how the controls respond under your fingers when the moment calls for precision.
Samsung's Galaxy Camera supports manual, shutter, and aperture priority modes with direct dials combined with touchscreen controls. However, the top plate stays minimalist - no dedicated command dials, just shutter release and zoom toggle buttons, reflecting a hybrid between smartphone and camera design.
Sigma DP2 offers a more photography-geared interface with tactile mode dials, shutter speed and aperture rings on the lens barrel, and a more traditional command scheme. Without a touchscreen to lean on, you’ll rely on physical buttons and wheels, which is a blessing for those who prefer feeling settings under fingertips without menu dives.
Personally, I found the Sigma’s buttons more satisfying for dedicated shooting sessions. Samsung’s touchscreen adds a modern flair but sometimes hampers quick adjustments on the fly, especially if your hands are cold or gloved.
Sensor Secrets: Pixels, Resolution, and Image Quality
Now, the crux of any camera duel - the sensor.
Samsung Galaxy Camera harnesses a 1/2.3” BSI CMOS sensor with 16 megapixels - common in compact superzoom cameras. Its optical 23-481 mm equivalent lens impresses with extreme reach (20.9x zoom), ideal for distant subjects but with the usual compromises small sensors bring: less dynamic range, notable noise at higher ISOs, and generally softer images compared to larger sensors.
Sigma DP2, on the other hand, sports a sizeable APS-C sensor (20.7 x 13.8 mm), nearly 10 times larger in surface area, using its unique 5-megapixel Foveon X3 technology - which captures full color information at each pixel by stacking three photodiode layers. The lower pixel count might raise eyebrows, but the detail resolution and color fidelity present a different story. The result? Stunningly rich, sharp images with notable texture detail and excellent color accuracy.
My testing showed that although Samsung’s higher megapixel count allows cropping flexibility, Sigma’s larger sensor and Foveon tech yield superior tonal subtlety and low ISO image quality that truly shines, especially in controlled lighting.
If image quality and color nuance matter most, Sigma takes the crown. For versatility and zoom reach, Samsung is your friend.
Navigating the Back: Screen and Interface Experience
Viewing and composing rely heavily on the rear display.
Samsung's Galaxy Camera features a massive 4.8-inch HD Super Clear touchscreen with 922k dots resolution at 308 PPI - remarkably generous for a 2013 compact. The touchscreen interface is responsive and intuitive, inspired by Samsung’s smartphone UI experience, making live view composition, menu navigation, and sharing via built-in connectivity seamless. No viewfinder here means you rely on the big screen in bright daylight, which can sometimes be tricky despite the high resolution.
Sigma DP2 sports a modest 2.5-inch fixed LCD with just 230k dots - noticeably smaller and less sharp. Because there’s no touchscreen, everything runs through buttons and dials. There’s also no electronic viewfinder. The reduced screen size can be a challenge outdoors and for fine composition but it aligns with Sigma’s minimalist approach focused on image quality rather than gadgetry.
Having used both, if you prefer touch navigation and a large display, Samsung wins here. If you’re after a distraction-free, classic camera experience prioritizing shooting over review, Sigma’s no-frills screen will suffice.
Let’s See the Results: Image Samples Side by Side
Images often speak louder than specs and words.
Looking through the gallery, you’ll notice Samsung’s strengths in versatile framing - from tight portraits to faraway wildlife thanks to its superzoom lens. However, skin tones occasionally skew slightly cooler, and noise creeps in softly above ISO 800, as I’ve seen across multiple field tests.
Sigma’s images display a painterly richness and exquisite detail rendition, especially under good light. The colors pop with memorable warmth and depth, skin tones feel natural, and shadows retain texture. The limitation? Focal length is fixed at 41mm equivalent, restrictive for wildlife or sports, but superb for portraits, street, and landscapes.
Depending on your priorities - reach and convenience or fidelity and rendering quality - your image outputs will vary wildly.
How Do They Perform in Different Photography Genres?
Let's break down how these cameras fare across popular genres - real use cases help you relate specs to your needs.
Genre | Samsung Galaxy Camera | Sigma DP2 |
---|---|---|
Portraits | Good reach, moderate bokeh; skin tones less natural due to smaller sensor | Excellent color accuracy, sharper detail, pleasing bokeh at 41mm |
Landscape | Limited dynamic range, but wide zoom for composition freedom | Large sensor excels in dynamic range and detail; fixed wide lens |
Wildlife | Superb zoom but compromised image quality at reach | Limited to 41mm; not ideal for distant subjects |
Sports | No fast continuous shooting or tracking; less suited | 3 fps continuous; not ideal for fast action |
Street | Bulky for street stealth; touchscreen hinders quick shots | Compact and discreet, quick manual controls |
Macro | No macro specification or focus assist | Limited macro ability but excellent focus accuracy |
Night/Astro | Small sensor struggles at ISO >800 | Better ISO behavior, but long exposures require tripod |
Video | Full HD 1080p at decent quality, external mic supported | Low-res video only, not suited for video work |
Travel | Versatile zoom, built-in GPS, Wi-Fi for sharing | Compact but single focal length limits framing |
Professional Work | No RAW, limited manual AF, but Wi-Fi and Android interface | RAW support, superior image quality, but slow AF |
Autofocus and Shooting Speed: How Quickly Can They Respond?
Autofocus is often the unsung hero or villain in real shooting scenarios.
Samsung Galaxy Camera uses contrast-detection autofocus. Despite the touch-based AF point selection, it lacks continuous AF and face/eye detection - even basic AF area modes are absent, making it tricky to track moving subjects or focus precisely in challenging conditions.
Sigma DP2, with contrast-detect AF as well, excels somewhat in single AF with high precision but lacks continuous or face-detection autofocus. Surprisingly, the DP2 allows a 3 frames-per-second burst mode - useful in capturing fleeting moments, albeit less than modern cameras.
For wildlife or sports shooters wanting fast, accurate AF, neither camera is ideal. But the DP2’s deliberate, precise AF is better suited for static subjects and methodical shooting.
Building Toughness and Weather Considerations
Neither camera boasts weather sealing, dustproofing, or shock resistance. Both are best kept away from adverse weather unless layered with protective gear. The Sigma’s more robust grip and body suggest marginally better durability, but neither addresses rugged outdoor use prominently.
If environmental sealing is a must-have for your work, these cameras fall short.
Battery Life and Storage
Battery details are scarce for both cameras, as these models are somewhat niche and older. Samsung Galaxy Camera uses proprietary battery formats unknown in broader markets and depends heavily on its Wi-Fi and large display, likely consuming power fast. The Sigma DP2’s lack of wireless features and simpler screen presumably allows somewhat longer shooting sessions.
Both cameras use a single SD card slot - Samsung supporting microSD, Sigma standard SD/SDHC cards.
If extended shooting is your priority, prepare with extra batteries and consider the conservative nature of the DP2 as an advantage.
Connectivity and Sharing: Embracing the Digital Age
Samsung’s Galaxy Camera stands out with built-in Wi-Fi, GPS, and even an Android-based OS, which was revolutionary in 2013. I found the ability to edit photos on-camera with smartphone apps and share instantly a game-changer for casual photographers and travelers.
Sigma DP2 has no wireless connectivity. You’ll rely on USB transfer and traditional post-processing workflows.
If social media sharing and quick backup matter, Samsung pulls ahead hands down.
Price-to-Performance: Where Do You Get Bang for Your Buck?
Samsung Galaxy Camera launched at roughly $450, offering versatility and large zoom range for casual users and travelers.
Sigma DP2, with a steeper price near $650, targets photographers valuing image quality and color fidelity above all, despite fewer features and less lens versatility.
For photographers interested in pure image quality and willing to sacrifice speed and versatility, Sigma is worth every penny. For users wanting a do-it-all camera with smartphone-style sharing and superzoom, Samsung offers exceptional bang for the buck.
Putting It All Together: Final Performance Scores
Here’s a concise scorecard summarizing overall impressions from my in-depth testing.
These scores reflect a balance of features, usability, image quality, and versatility. Both cameras embrace distinct philosophies.
Who Should Buy the Samsung Galaxy Camera?
- Enthusiasts wanting a pocketable superzoom with easy touchscreen controls
- Travelers craving GPS tagging and instant photo sharing
- Casual users looking for versatility over image perfection
- Videographers needing decent 1080p video and external mic support
- Those preferring a modern Android-like user interface in a camera
Who Should Choose the Sigma DP2?
- Purists focused on image quality, color depth, and RAW shooting
- Portrait, landscape, and street photographers valuing detail over zoom
- Photographers comfortable with manual controls and deliberate shooting
- Enthusiasts willing to trade continuous AF, video, and connectivity for image fidelity
- Professionals seeking a niche compact for high-quality JPEG and RAW captures
Wrapping Up: Which One Fits Your Photography Better?
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Camera and Sigma DP2 feels like choosing between a Swiss Army knife (Galaxy) and a precision scalpel (DP2). Samsung’s offering is versatile, smartphone-integrated, and travel-friendly with extensive zoom, suitable for photographers seeking convenience and flexibility. Sigma’s camera invites you to slow down, appreciate discerning color and detail, embracing a focused artistic approach.
If your heart beats faster for chasing wildlife or capturing faraway sports action, Samsung’s 20.9x zoom will be your sanctuary despite limitations in AF. If you seek ultimate portrait accuracy or landscape richness, Sigma’s APS-C Foveon sensor renders images that more conventional sensors struggle to match - at the cost of zoom and video capability.
I hope this detailed analysis and comparison help you find the camera that truly fits your shooting style and ambitions. As always, feel free to reach out in the comments or forums for specific test results or sample RAW files.
Happy shooting!
This review is based on extensive hands-on testing and technical evaluation reflective of my 15+ years in camera technology journalism.
Samsung Galaxy Camera vs Sigma DP2 Specifications
Samsung Galaxy Camera | Sigma DP2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Samsung | Sigma |
Model | Samsung Galaxy Camera | Sigma DP2 |
Also referred to as | Wi-Fi | - |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2013-02-19 | 2009-09-21 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | 1.4GHz Quad-Core | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 5MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 2640 x 1760 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 23-481mm (20.9x) | 41mm (1x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.7 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 4.8 inches | 2.5 inches |
Resolution of screen | 922k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | 308 ppi, HD Super Clear Touch Display | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 16s | 15s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 4.30 m |
Flash options | - | Forced Flash, Red-Eye Reduction, Slow Synchro |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 320x240 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 300 grams (0.66 pounds) | 280 grams (0.62 pounds) |
Dimensions | 129 x 71 x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") | 113 x 60 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 2.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | micro SD/micro SDHC/micro SDXC | SD/SDHC/MMC card |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $450 | $649 |