Samsung Galaxy Camera vs Sigma SD1 Merrill
90 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
57 Imaging
56 Features
45 Overall
51
Samsung Galaxy Camera vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-481mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 300g - 129 x 71 x 19mm
- Introduced February 2013
- Other Name is Wi-Fi
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 790g - 146 x 113 x 80mm
- Revealed April 2012
- Replaced the Sigma SD1
Samsung Galaxy Camera vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Overview
Lets look a bit more in depth at the Samsung Galaxy Camera and Sigma SD1 Merrill, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by brands Samsung and Sigma. The sensor resolution of the Galaxy Camera (16MP) and the SD1 Merrill (15MP) is pretty close but the Galaxy Camera (1/2.3") and SD1 Merrill (APS-C) enjoy different sensor dimensions.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Galaxy Camera was introduced 11 months after the SD1 Merrill which means that they are of a similar generation. Both cameras come with different body type with the Samsung Galaxy Camera being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD1 Merrill being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before getting straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the Galaxy Camera scores vs the SD1 Merrill when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Galaxy Camera vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung Galaxy Camera and Sigma SD1 Merrill. The whole galleries are available at Samsung Galaxy Camera Gallery and Sigma SD1 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy Camera over the Sigma SD1 Merrill
Galaxy Camera | SD1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2013 | April 2012 | More modern by 11 months | |
Screen dimension | 4.8" | 3" | Bigger screen (+1.8") | |
Screen resolution | 922k | 460k | Clearer screen (+462k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD1 Merrill over the Samsung Galaxy Camera
SD1 Merrill | Galaxy Camera |
---|
Common features in the Samsung Galaxy Camera and Sigma SD1 Merrill
Galaxy Camera | SD1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very exact focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Samsung Galaxy Camera vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry around your camera frequently, you're going to have to think about its weight and volume. The Samsung Galaxy Camera offers outer measurements of 129mm x 71mm x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") with a weight of 300 grams (0.66 lbs) and the Sigma SD1 Merrill has sizing of 146mm x 113mm x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") along with a weight of 790 grams (1.74 lbs).
Check the Samsung Galaxy Camera and Sigma SD1 Merrill in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you choose at that moment. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the Galaxy Camera and the SD1 Merrill.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Galaxy Camera and SD1 Merrill is 90 and 57 respectively.
Samsung Galaxy Camera vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be hard to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes simply by looking through technical specs. The pic here will give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the Galaxy Camera and SD1 Merrill.
As you can tell, the two cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The Galaxy Camera using its smaller sensor is going to make getting bokeh tougher and the Samsung Galaxy Camera will render more detail using its extra 1MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The more modern Galaxy Camera should have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Samsung Galaxy Camera vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung Galaxy Camera vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Specifications
Samsung Galaxy Camera | Sigma SD1 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Samsung | Sigma |
Model | Samsung Galaxy Camera | Sigma SD1 Merrill |
Otherwise known as | Wi-Fi | - |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced DSLR |
Introduced | 2013-02-19 | 2012-04-10 |
Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | 1.4GHz Quad-Core | Dual True II |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 15 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4800 x 3200 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens focal range | 23-481mm (20.9x) | - |
Max aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | - |
Number of lenses | - | 76 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 4.8 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 922 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | 308 ppi, HD Super Clear Touch Display | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 96% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 16s | - |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | - | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 300 gr (0.66 pounds) | 790 gr (1.74 pounds) |
Dimensions | 129 x 71 x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") | 146 x 113 x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | - | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | micro SD/micro SDHC/micro SDXC | Compact Flash (Type I, UDMA compatible) |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $450 | $2,339 |