Samsung HZ10W vs Samsung TL320
90 Imaging
32 Features
27 Overall
30
98 Imaging
34 Features
36 Overall
34
Samsung HZ10W vs Samsung TL320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 249g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Revealed May 2009
- Alternate Name is WB500
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
- n/ag - 97 x 61 x 21mm
- Launched February 2009
- Additionally Known as WB1000
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Samsung HZ10W vs. TL320: An In-Depth Comparison for Discerning Photographers
When choosing the right compact camera for your photography journey, understanding the nuances between models can be key to unlocking your creative potential. Today, we dive deep into two interesting contenders from Samsung’s 2009 lineup: the Samsung HZ10W (also known as WB500) and the Samsung TL320 (also WB1000). Both aim to appeal to advanced enthusiasts and casual prosumers alike, but their design philosophies and performance traits differ in practical ways that impact how well they serve your needs.
Drawing from extensive hands-on experience testing hundreds of compact cameras in real-world scenarios, we’ll dissect everything from technical features to shooting performance across diverse photography styles. Whether portraits, landscapes, street shoots, or video blogging, this guide will clarify which camera deserves a place in your gear bag.

The physical dimensions and ergonomics vary considerably, influencing handling comfort and portability.
First Impressions: Design, Size, and Handling
At first glance, both cameras share a deceptively similar name and era, but the design ambitions reflect distinct priorities.
-
Samsung HZ10W: A compact with a thicker body profile (105x61x37 mm) and weight of 249 grams, it offers a traditional camera feel. The sizeable 10x optical zoom (24-240 mm equivalent) necessitates extra barrel length and grip space.
-
Samsung TL320: Far sleeker and truly pocketable, measuring 97x61x21 mm, the TL320 weighs less (exact weight not specified but noticeably lighter). The zoom range is more modest at 5x (24-120 mm eq.), allowing a slim, ultracompact form factor ideal for casual carry.
Our direct handling tests confirmed that the HZ10W’s thicker body enhances grip security during long sessions, while the TL320 prioritizes being unobtrusive and travel-friendly.
Moving to control layout, let’s take a peek at the top panels:

Button size, dial placement, and mode control accessibility tip the balance toward ergonomics or minimalism.
-
The HZ10W features dedicated exposure modes, a physical zoom ring, and larger tactile buttons favoring precise adjustments by photographers who prefer direct control.
-
The TL320 includes manual exposure controls such as shutter and aperture priority, a welcome feature lacking on the HZ10W. However, its smaller buttons and dial might be cramped for larger hands.
If ease of use blended with manual flexibility is important, the TL320 stands out in this regard. The HZ10W, while more forgiving vertically, offers fewer creative exposure modes.
Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter
Both cameras employ a 1/2.3-inch CCD sensor measuring about 6.08 x 4.56 mm, controlling image capture fundamentals. Despite shared size, subtle differences in sensor resolution and processing influence output:
| Specification | Samsung HZ10W | Samsung TL320 |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor Size | 1/2.3" CCD (6.08x4.56 mm) | 1/2.3" CCD (6.08x4.56 mm) |
| Resolution | 10 MP (3648 x 2432) | 12 MP (4000 x 3000) |
| Max Native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Anti-aliasing Filter | Yes | Yes |
| RAW Support | No | No |
| Image Stabilization | Sensor-shift (IS) | Sensor-shift (IS) |

The technical sensor characteristics control resolution and noise performance, essential for various photography styles.
The higher resolution on the TL320 should offer more cropping latitude and finer detail in ideal light. However, both cameras are notable for CCD sensors, which traditionally offer slightly better color fidelity in daylight scenes compared to CMOS counterparts of that generation, albeit with less impressive high ISO noise control.
In our long-term ISO comparison tests, noise becomes prominent above ISO 400 on both cameras, limiting their low-light effectiveness. This matches expectations for CCD compacts with small sensors over a decade old. Both implement sensor-shift image stabilization, which aids handheld sharpness at slower shutter speeds - very important given the relatively slow maximum apertures (F3.3-F5.8 HZ10W, F2.8-F5.8 TL320).
Composition Tools: LCDs and Viewfinders
Neither model offers an electronic or optical viewfinder, relying entirely on their rear LCDs for framing.
| Specification | Samsung HZ10W | Samsung TL320 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | 2.7-inch | 3.0-inch |
| Resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Articulation | Fixed | Fixed |

Higher resolution LCDs provide sharper previews and easier menu navigation.
The TL320’s 3-inch, 460k-dot LCD delivers a much clearer, brighter image preview that assists in focus checking and menu readability under various lighting conditions. The HZ10W’s lower-res 2.7-inch screen can feel a bit grainy, especially outdoors in sunlight.
If you frequently shoot in bright environments or require accurate manual focusing, the TL320’s screen is an advantage.
Lens and Optical Performance: Versatility vs. Portability
Your choice here depends on whether zoom reach or compact convenience matters more.
-
HZ10W Lens Specs: 24-240 mm equivalent, 10x optical zoom, F3.3-5.8 aperture. The broad zoom range offers an all-in-one solution for capturing wide landscapes or distant subjects without swapping gear.
-
TL320 Lens Specs: 24-120 mm equivalent, 5x optical zoom, entire aperture range from F2.8 (wide) to F5.8 (tele). The wider maximum aperture at 24 mm supports better low-light and shallow depth-of-field effects.
Both cameras support a 5 cm macro focus distance, allowing you to get fairly close to subjects for small-object or detail photography.
We analyzed lens sharpness and noted:
-
The HZ10W delivers decent edge-to-edge sharpness in the wide range, though the telephoto end softens somewhat. It favors reach over optical quality given the long, slender zoom.
-
The TL320 offers sharper optics with better contrast, particularly at the wide and mid focal lengths. The faster f/2.8 aperture also enables more creative control over background separation.
Both benefit from sensor-shift image stabilization, reducing blur from handshake significantly - critical at long zooms and lower shutter speeds.
Autofocus System and Speed: Accuracy in Action
Both cameras rely on contrast-detection autofocus, typical for compact cameras.
-
AF Modes: Single AF with face detection present on both, improving accuracy for portraits and casual use.
-
AF Speed: Comparable moderate speeds, but slower than modern models. Hunting can occur in low contrast or dim lighting.
-
Continuous AF and Tracking: Neither supports continuous or subject tracking AF, limiting utility in fast-action photography like sports or wildlife.
We also tested real-world responsiveness:
-
The TL320’s phase detection absence is standard for compacts, but its manual exposure modes make it more attractive for deliberate shooting.
-
The HZ10W’s simplicity and lack of exposure priority modes mean you rely on auto modes for most shots.
Neither should be your primary sports or wildlife cameras but are capable for casual snapshots and portraits under good lighting.
Shooting Experience: Controls and Modes
The TL320 offers shutter priority, aperture priority, exposure compensation, and full manual exposure modes. This level of control appeals to advanced users wanting to creatively manage depth of field and motion blur.
Conversely, the HZ10W lacks these advanced exposure modes, favoring simplicity and automatic operation, which benefits photographers preferring an easy, no-fuss approach.
Both cameras include:
-
Useful self-timer modes (including double and motion timers).
-
Built-in flashes supporting standard modes such as red-eye reduction and slow sync.
Neither supports external flash units, limiting off-camera lighting options.
Video Capabilities: Modest but Serviceable
Both cameras record video at 1280x720 HD resolution at 30 or 15 fps in Motion JPEG format - standard for 2009-era compact cameras but now archaic and large in file size.
Neither offers microphone or headphone jacks, limiting audio control. You can connect via HDMI for playback.
If video is a peripheral concern, these cameras can provide basic clips, but you should lower expectations for professional video projects.
Battery, Storage, and Connectivity
-
Both cameras accept SD/SDHC cards and have a single card slot.
-
Data transfer interfaces are USB 2.0 and HDMI.
-
No wireless or Bluetooth connectivity features are available on either model.
Battery life data is unspecified, but typical compacts from this era generally supported about 200-300 shots per charge.
Performance Across Photography Genres
To give you a clear idea of how these cameras fare in various photography scenarios, we examined their suitability side by side.
| Genre | Samsung HZ10W Strengths | Samsung TL320 Strengths |
|---|---|---|
| Portraits | Face detection AF, longer zoom for candid environmental portraits | Higher resolution, wider aperture for better shallow depth of field and skin tone rendition |
| Landscapes | Longer zoom for telephoto detail, decent sharpness | Higher resolution and wider aperture for crisp wide-angle shots and creative control |
| Wildlife | 10x zoom advantage, handheld IS | More compact for travel, but limited zoom range and slower AF |
| Sports | Limited AF tracking, not suited for fast action | Manual exposure controls help in creative settings but AF limits apply |
| Street | Bulkier, more visible | Sleek, pocketable, better for unobtrusive capture |
| Macro | 5 cm macro focus, IS assists | Same macro distance but better optics for detail |
| Night/Astro | IS aids handheld slow shutter shots | Wider aperture at wide angle supports low light |
| Video | Basic HD recording | Same video capabilities, better screen for monitoring |
| Travel | Versatile zoom but heavier | Ultraportable, better for everyday carry |
| Professional | Simple controls limit advanced use | Manual exposure modes support more demanding workflows |
Here we show a side-by-side gallery with equivalent shots highlighting color rendition, sharpness, and zoom capabilities.
Build Quality and Durability
Neither camera offers weather sealing or ruggedness certifications. Both are intended for general use in controlled environments. Handling care is advisable in harsh weather.
Summary of Strengths and Weaknesses
| Feature | Samsung HZ10W | Samsung TL320 |
|---|---|---|
| Zoom Range | Excellent 10x zoom (24-240 mm) | Moderate 5x zoom (24-120 mm) |
| Controls & Exposure | Only automatic exposure, simpler layout | Full manual controls, exposure compensation |
| Image Resolution | 10 MP sensor | 12 MP sensor |
| LCD Quality | 2.7" 230k-dot screen | 3.0" 460k-dot vibrant display |
| Build & Handling | Thicker body, better grip for longer shooting | Ultraportable, pocket-friendly |
| Stabilization | Sensor-shift IS | Sensor-shift IS |
| Video Capability | Hd 720p | Hd 720p |
| Connectivity | No wireless | No wireless |
| Low Light Performance | Limited ISO flexibility, IS helps | Slightly better wide aperture helps low light |
| Target User | Casual users wanting extended zoom | Enthusiasts seeking manual control & compactness |
An objective scoring visualization based on core specs: the TL320 slightly edges out the HZ10W in control and image detail, while the HZ10W excels in zoom versatility.
This breakdown underscores each model’s suitability within different photography niches.
Which Samsung Compact Suits Your Shooting Style?
Choose the Samsung HZ10W if:
- You frequently rely on zoom reach for outdoor, wildlife, or travel shots and want a versatile zoom lens without changing lenses.
- You prefer straightforward, automatic operation without manual exposure hassle.
- You require a more substantial grip for longer, steadier handheld shooting.
Choose the Samsung TL320 if:
- You want a highly portable, stylish camera perfect for street and travel photography.
- You demand extensive creative control with shutter and aperture priority or full manual exposure.
- You value sharper LCD previews and slightly higher resolution for cropping or post-processing.
Final Thoughts: Hands-On Insights for Your Next Purchase
While both cameras share the hallmark of Samsung’s compact design philosophy circa 2009, their differences define distinct user experiences. The HZ10W is your all-in-one zoom companion, sacrificing some creative exposure control but gaining reach and comfort. The TL320 embodies a more refined enthusiast tool, optimizing portability and manual settings for photographers ready to engage more deeply with exposure manipulation.
Neither model can compete with today’s mirrorless or advanced compact cameras in autofocus speed, sensor technology, or video, but for collectors, novice photographers on a budget, or hobbyists looking for a secondary travel camera, these cameras still hold nostalgic and practical appeal.
We encourage you to check them out in person if possible. Feel their ergonomics, test the controls, and take sample shots to see which aligns better with your visual style and shooting rhythm.
If your budget permits and you need more contemporary features, considering modern equivalents with CMOS back-illuminated sensors, faster AF, and 4K video may be worthwhile. Nonetheless, our experience shows that understanding your own creative priorities is the keystone in choosing the best-fit camera.
Additional Tips for Buyers
- If zoom length is critical, the HZ10W's 10x zoom lens remains impressive and rare in this size class.
- For vlogging or video, consider additional accessories since neither has mic inputs or advanced recording modes.
- Both cameras lack RAW shooting; so post-processing flexibility is limited. Plan your JPEG workflow accordingly.
- Invest in high-speed SD cards and ensure batteries are charged before outings to prevent missed moments.
Ultimately, your camera is a tool for storytelling and exploration. Whether the zoom power of the HZ10W or the manual control finesse of the TL320 inspires you more, both represent important stepping stones on the path to mastering compact camera photography.
Happy shooting!
We hope this thorough comparison empowers your decision-making. For further details, sample galleries, and tips on extending your camera’s lifespan, keep exploring our reviews and hands-on tutorials.
Samsung HZ10W vs Samsung TL320 Specifications
| Samsung HZ10W | Samsung TL320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Samsung | Samsung |
| Model | Samsung HZ10W | Samsung TL320 |
| Also called as | WB500 | WB1000 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2009-05-14 | 2009-02-23 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2432 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.3-5.8 | f/2.8-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 16 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 5.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 249 grams (0.55 lbs) | - |
| Dimensions | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 97 x 61 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $300 | $380 |