Samsung HZ10W vs Sigma DP2 Merrill
90 Imaging
33 Features
27 Overall
30
83 Imaging
56 Features
33 Overall
46
Samsung HZ10W vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 249g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Released May 2009
- Additionally referred to as WB500
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- 50mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 59mm
- Released February 2012
- Superseded the Sigma DP1 Merrill
- Later Model is Sigma DP3 Merrill
Samsung HZ10W vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Overview
Here, we are analyzing the Samsung HZ10W vs Sigma DP2 Merrill, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Samsung and Sigma. There exists a considerable gap between the image resolutions of the HZ10W (10MP) and DP2 Merrill (15MP) and the HZ10W (1/2.3") and DP2 Merrill (APS-C) boast different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe HZ10W was announced 3 years prior to the DP2 Merrill which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Samsung HZ10W being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a brief overview of how the HZ10W grades versus the DP2 Merrill for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung HZ10W vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung HZ10W & Sigma DP2 Merrill. The whole galleries are provided at Samsung HZ10W Gallery & Sigma DP2 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ10W over the Sigma DP2 Merrill
HZ10W | DP2 Merrill |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Merrill over the Samsung HZ10W
DP2 Merrill | HZ10W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2012 | May 2009 | More modern by 33 months | |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung HZ10W and Sigma DP2 Merrill
HZ10W | DP2 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial accurate focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Absent Touch friendly display |
Samsung HZ10W vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera often, you'll have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Samsung HZ10W provides outer dimensions of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") with a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs) and the Sigma DP2 Merrill has dimensions of 122mm x 67mm x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") with a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
Check the Samsung HZ10W vs Sigma DP2 Merrill in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the HZ10W against the DP2 Merrill.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the HZ10W and DP2 Merrill is 90 and 83 respectively.
Samsung HZ10W vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes purely by going over a spec sheet. The picture underneath will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the HZ10W and DP2 Merrill.
As you can see, each of the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The HZ10W with its tinier sensor is going to make shooting bokeh tougher and the Sigma DP2 Merrill will offer you extra detail with its extra 5MP. Greater resolution will let you crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more aged HZ10W is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Samsung HZ10W vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung HZ10W vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Specifications
Samsung HZ10W | Sigma DP2 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Samsung | Sigma |
Model | Samsung HZ10W | Sigma DP2 Merrill |
Also called as | WB500 | - |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Released | 2009-05-14 | 2012-02-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Dual TRUE II engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 15 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2432 | 4704 x 3136 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 50mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.3-5.8 | f/2.8 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 16 seconds | - |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 4.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) | 640x480 |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 249g (0.55 lb) | 330g (0.73 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 122 x 67 x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal | - |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $300 | $931 |