Samsung HZ25W vs. Sony RX1R II: A Deep Dive into Two Compact Cameras from Different Eras and Classes

When we set out to compare the Samsung HZ25W and the Sony RX1R II, it’s like examining two entirely different beasts under the compact camera umbrella. One, a 2010-era small sensor superzoom, tries to pack versatility and reach in a straightforward package. The other, a 2015 large sensor compact, is a high-end flagship designed for image quality buffs who want full-frame performance in a pocketable form factor.

With over 15 years and thousands of cameras tested, I find these comparisons both challenging and rewarding. The goal here is not merely to chase specs but to understand how these cameras serve very different types of photographers and use cases, highlighting practical strengths and compromises. Let’s jump into this thorough head-to-head, drawing on hands-on experience, technical benchmarks, and real-world usability, and backing it all up with detailed imagery and performance data.

First Impressions and Physical Handling: The Feel and Ergonomics of Use

When you hold these cameras side-by-side, the differences in design ethos leap out. The Samsung HZ25W, launched in 2010 as a small sensor superzoom compact, offers a chunkier body with substantial grip bulge to accommodate its long zoom lens. The Sony RX1R II, announced in 2015, channels minimalist elegance with a compact full-frame sensor inside a more refined chassis.

Samsung’s HZ25W measures 116x83x92 mm and weighs a light 428 grams, which is quite forgiving given the extensive 24x zoom lens (26-624 mm equivalent). In contrast, the RX1R II comes in smaller dimensions at 113x65x72 mm but heavier at 507 grams due to its full-frame sensor and robust metal construction.

Ergonomically, the HZ25W leans toward casual users with its simple button layout and lack of an electronic viewfinder (EVF), relying solely on a fixed 3" LCD of modest 230k-dot resolution. This can feel limiting in bright outdoor scenarios.

The RX1R II features a sophisticated design with a built-in EVF boasting 2.3 million-dot resolution and a tilting 3" LCD at 1229k dots. The EVF is a decisive convenience for professionals accustomed to shooting in variable lighting and needing critical framing.

From a handling perspective, I found the RX1R II’s well-machined controls and grip far better suited to prolonged, deliberate shooting. The Samsung, while reasonably comfortable, feels like a point-and-shoot with no-frills ergonomics. More control customization options on the Sony further reinforce this.

Sensor Technology and Image Quality: Small Sensor Superzoom Versus Full-Frame Powerhouse

This section is where the chasm widens dramatically. The Samsung HZ25W utilizes a 1/2.3-inch CCD sensor measuring 6.08x4.56 mm with a total sensor area of just under 28 mm² and a native resolution of 12 MP. Its CCD architecture, by 2010 standards, offered decent image quality for compact cameras but was already being eclipsed by CMOS sensors in noise performance and dynamic range.

Conversely, the Sony RX1R II boasts a massive 35.9x24 mm full-frame back-illuminated CMOS sensor with 42.4 MP resolution, delivering an extensive sensor area of approximately 862 mm². This sensor ranks extremely high on DxO Mark, with a score of 97, superior color depth (25.8 bits), dynamic range (13.9 EV), and outstanding low-light ISO performance topping out at ISO 102,400.

In real-world tests, the RX1R II’s images show prodigious detail, vibrant color rendition, and clear shadow recovery, making it well-suited to demanding applications like landscape and commercial portraiture. The absence of an anti-aliasing (AA) filter expedites razor-sharp image capture, with the tradeoff of possibly revealing moiré in rare situations.

The HZ25W, limited by its smaller sensor, produces noisier images in low light and less fine detail at higher ISOs. The telephoto reach allows flexibility in composition but at the cost of subject detail, especially beyond mid-zoom ranges. Color depth and dynamic range lag noticeably when compared to modern(ish) CMOS full-frame standards.

Autofocus Systems and Speed: From Contrast-Detection Simplicity to Hybrid Sophistication

When analyzing autofocus performance, I always evaluate focus speed, accuracy, tracking steadiness, and low-light sensitivity. The Samsung HZ25W relies on a straightforward contrast-detection AF system limited to center-weighted focus with no face or eye detection, fixed AF points, or continuous tracking. This performs acceptably in bright conditions for static subjects, but quickly loses effectiveness under lower light or fast action scenarios.

The Sony RX1R II employs a hybrid AF system combining 25 phase-detection points with contrast AF, integrated with face and eye detection algorithms. This AF is remarkably precise and reasonable in speed for a compact large sensor camera, although it doesn’t quite match the blazing performance of Sony’s mirrorless Alpha series.

Tracking moving subjects like wildlife or sports is efficient but not a standout feature in continuous burst modes, limited to 5 fps max - more about patient composition here than capturing 100 mph thrills.

Zoom, Lenses, and Flexibility: Reach Versus Optical Excellence

Let’s talk lenses - a crucial factor for all photographers. The Samsung HZ25W’s 26-624 mm equivalent zoom (24x optical zoom) with F2.8-5.0 aperture range is impressive for a compact at the time of launch. It visually covers everything from wide-angle street shots to distant wildlife or action without carrying lenses, making it excellent for travel or casual wildlife.

Meanwhile, the Sony RX1R II features a single, fixed 35mm F2.0 Zeiss Sonnar T* lens. There’s no zoom here - and that might seem like a limitation. However, the optical quality is superb, achieving stunning sharpness across the frame and creamy bokeh thanks to the bright aperture and optical design.

For macro work, the Sony offers a minimum focusing distance of 14cm versus Samsung’s 10cm, but in practice, the RX1R II’s full-frame sensor and lack of distortion deliver greater detail and pleasant out-of-focus backgrounds.

Video Capabilities: Modest Comes From Samsung, Pro-ish Options From Sony

Samsung’s HZ25W delivers basic HD video recording at 1280x720 (720p) resolution at 30 fps in Motion JPEG format. This format is outdated, producing large files and limited editing flexibility; there’s no external microphone input, nor 4K support, and no in-body stabilization beyond optical correction for stills.

Sony RX1R II steps up with full HD 1080p video at 60p, 60i, and 24p options, including slow-motion 720p at 120 fps. It offers multiple codecs including MPEG-4, AVCHD, and XAVC S, enabling better video quality and post-processing. It additionally supports external microphones - a boon for serious videographers - but lacks in-body image stabilization, so a gimbal or tripod is advised for smooth footage.

Neither camera supports 4K video recording, which is not surprising given their release windows.

Interface, Screen, and Viewfinder: LCD and EVF Showdown

Comparing displays illustrates each camera’s target market. The Samsung HZ25W sports a fixed 3-inch screen with 230k-dot resolution which looks pixelated and dim outdoors. It doesn’t have touch capabilities, nor an EVF, pushing the photographer to rely on the LCD.

The Sony RX1R II offers a tiltable 3-inch LCD with a high 1229k-dot resolution, allowing angled shooting and sharper image review. More crucially, it comes with a built-in “pop-up” electronic viewfinder, boasting 2.3 million dots with 100% coverage and 0.74x magnification - exceptional for critical framing and assessing exposure.

Battery, Storage, and Connectivity: Practical Considerations

Regarding endurance, the Samsung’s battery life was unspecified in documentation, but typically such compacts offer under 300 shots per charge - enough for casual outings but lacking for intensive use. Storage options include standard SD/SDHC cards with one slot and some internal memory.

The RX1R II uses the NP-BX1 battery rated for about 220 shots per charge, typical for large sensor compacts with EVFs. Storage is via SD/SDHC/SDXC cards and Sony’s Memory Stick Pro Duo for compatibility. It also includes built-in Wi-Fi and NFC for wireless image transfer, something Samsung’s model lacks completely.

USB 2.0 support is common to both, but the Sony adds HDMI output for external displays - vital for tethered work or presentations.

Durability and Build Quality: Neither Rugged, but Worlds Apart in Feel

Neither camera features weather sealing, dustproofing, or splash resistance, marking them as delicate instruments suitable for careful use.

However, the RX1R II exhibits a robust all-metal build with solid weight and balance that inspires confidence in field shooting. The Samsung, while decently made, employs more plastic and feels more consumer-grade.

Photography Genres: How Each Camera Excels and Falls Short

Let’s parse how these two cameras fare across common photography domains:

Portrait Photography

Sony’s RX1R II is the clear winner here. Its 42 MP full-frame sensor combined with the 35mm F2.0 lens delivers exquisite skin tonal gradation, shallow depth-of-field bokeh, and critically sharp eyes thanks to face detection AF. The Samsung’s fixed lens zoom is versatile but limited by narrow aperture at telephoto end and noisier images.

Landscape Photography

The RX1R II again excels due to its wide dynamic range and vast resolution to pull fine textures and details in shadows and highlights. Lack of weather sealing is a caveat but manageable with care.

Samsung’s smaller sensor limits dynamic range and pixel-untility, and the long zoom risks camera shake without a tripod. However, the wide-to-tele zoom gives framing flexibility beyond the RX1R II’s fixed focal length.

Wildlife Photography

Samsung’s 24x zoom is an asset for inexpensive wildlife framing at a distance, but autofocus speed and accuracy are average. RX1R II’s AF is faster and more accurate but no zoom means you must physically move closer or crop, sacrificing quality.

Burst rates favor neither: Samsung doesn’t support continuous shooting, Sony peaks at 5 fps, low compared to dedicated wildlife cameras.

Sports Photography

Neither is optimal. The RX1R II’s tracking AF and 5 fps burst rate may capture slower sports action but not fast-paced subjects. Samsung’s fixed AF and lack of continuous burst preclude action sequences.

Street Photography

Sony’s compactness, quiet shutter, and discrete EVF make it ideal here, letting photographers work unobtrusively with fast manual focus control.

Samsung is bulkier and noisier, with less precise AF – less suited for spontaneous street moments.

Macro Photography

Sony allows focusing as close as 14cm, combined with the large sensor, rendering macro details with artistic bokeh. Samsung, despite closer 10cm macro range, cannot match detail sharply due to sensor limits.

Night and Astrophotography

Sony’s high ISO capabilities shine under low light and astrophotography, producing clean images at ISOs where Samsung’s images degrade quickly. Its shutter range down to 30s supports long exposures.

Samsung’s max shutter is 1/16s minimum (probably a typo for 16s maximum shutter speed), and noise rises above ISO 800 quickly.

Video Capabilities

Sony wins hands down with full HD 60p, multiple codecs, microphone input, and customizable modes. Samsung’s limited to basic 720p MJPEG, no audio in/out, and no stabilization for smooth footage.

Travel Photography

Samsung’s long zoom and lightweight build offer versatility on trips with minimal gear. Sony’s superb image quality and compactness balance weight but lose zoom flexibility.

Battery life and storage favor Sony’s modern connectivity for quick sharing, though Sony’s shorter battery life might require extra packs.

Professional Use

Sony’s RAW support, superior file quality, customizable controls, and solid build advocate it as a professional compact. Samsung is more of an enthusiast-to-consumer camera with limited manual control and less robust files.

Samsung HZ25W front Samsung HZ25W screen back Sony RX1R II front Sony RX1R II screen back

Technical Scoring: Objective Measures of Overall and Genre-Specific Performance

To provide quantifiable insight, I examined DxO Mark scores (where available) and tested real shooting conditions:

• Samsung HZ25W: DxO has no official scores for this model, but tests reveal its small sensor limits color depth and dynamic range sharply relative to modern standards.

• Sony RX1R II: Official DxO overall score of 97, placing it among the top compact cameras ever tested, excelling across color depth, dynamic range, and low-light ISO capability.

Breaking down genre-specific assessments further clarifies:

Sony dominates across portrait, landscape, and night photography. Samsung excels marginally in telephoto zoom applications (wildlife/travel) due to lens reach but is handicapped by image quality.

Price and Value: Investing Wisely Based on Needs

The Samsung HZ25W, priced around $350, caters to budget-conscious photographers needing a single, versatile camera with zoom reach but acceptable image quality at modest ISO.

The Sony RX1R II carries a hefty $3,300 price tag, justified by its cutting-edge sensor, Zeiss optics, professional features, and versatile workflow integration. This is a tool built for image quality purists, fine art profiles, and pros.

Recommendations: Who Should Buy Which?

• Choose the Samsung HZ25W if:
  You want a pocketable, all-in-one zoom camera for casual travel and wildlife snapshots on a budget. Manual controls and image quality are secondary to lens reach and simplicity.

• Choose the Sony RX1R II if:
  You prioritize image quality above all, working in portrait, commercial, or fine art photography. You want full-frame performance without carrying bulky DSLRs or mirrorless systems. You also require flexible RAW workflows and high-end video features.

• Neither?
  If you need faster autofocus, weather sealing, or 4K video, newer mirrorless models may suit better, but expect larger size or expense.

Final Thoughts: Two Cameras, Two Worlds

Comparing the Samsung HZ25W and Sony RX1R II is akin to comparing a compact 2010-era Swiss Army knife with a 2015-era premium scalpel. Both serve photography but for remarkably different users.

The Samsung delivers reach and ease but at the cost of outdated sensor performance and limited controls. The RX1R II is a well-crafted masterpiece for enthusiasts and professionals craving uncompromising image quality in a compact form.

Both cameras hold value for their categories, and understanding their strengths and limitations enables us to guide photographers to the best fit for their visual storytelling adventures.

If image quality and manual control are your north star, the Sony RX1R II stands tall. If zoom versatility and affordability top your list, the Samsung HZ25W remains a capable companion.

Happy shooting!

This review is informed by extensive hands-on testing under diverse conditions, evaluating both objective metrics and subjective usability to empower informed buying decisions.

End of Article