Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung SL202
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Announced June 2010
- Alternate Name is WB650
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Announced February 2009
- Other Name is PL50
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung SL202 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Samsung HZ35W and Samsung SL202, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both manufactured by Samsung. The image resolution of the HZ35W (12MP) and the SL202 (10MP) is very close and they feature the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe HZ35W was brought out 17 months after the SL202 making the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the HZ35W grades versus the SL202 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung HZ35W & Samsung SL202. The entire galleries are viewable at Samsung HZ35W Gallery & Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Samsung SL202
| HZ35W | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | June 2010 |  | February 2009 | More modern by 17 months |
| Focus manually |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 614k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+384k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Samsung HZ35W
| SL202 | HZ35W |
|---|
Common features in the Samsung HZ35W and Samsung SL202
| HZ35W | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Missing Touch friendly display |
Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry around your camera frequently, you should factor its weight and measurements. The Samsung HZ35W features exterior dimensions of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Samsung SL202 has proportions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Look at the Samsung HZ35W and Samsung SL202 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have at that moment. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the HZ35W versus the SL202.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the HZ35W and SL202 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to visualize the gap in sensor sizes merely by viewing specs. The image below should give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the HZ35W and SL202.
All in all, each of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You can expect to see the Samsung HZ35W to result in more detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images a little more aggressively. The more recent HZ35W should have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
| Samsung HZ35W | Samsung SL202 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Samsung | Samsung |
| Model type | Samsung HZ35W | Samsung SL202 |
| Also Known as | WB650 | PL50 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2010-06-16 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-360mm (15.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.8 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 614 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 16s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.00 m | 4.60 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 245 grams (0.54 lbs) | 168 grams (0.37 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | SLB-11A | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $300 | $140 |