Clicky

Samsung HZ35W vs Sony A350

Portability
91
Imaging
35
Features
42
Overall
37
Samsung HZ35W front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 front
Portability
62
Imaging
53
Features
47
Overall
50

Samsung HZ35W vs Sony A350 Key Specs

Samsung HZ35W
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
  • 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
  • Revealed June 2010
  • Also referred to as WB650
Sony A350
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 674g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
  • Released June 2008
  • Newer Model is Sony A380
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Samsung HZ35W vs Sony A350 Overview

Lets look more in depth at the Samsung HZ35W and Sony A350, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Samsung and Sony. The sensor resolution of the HZ35W (12MP) and the A350 (14MP) is fairly close but the HZ35W (1/2.3") and A350 (APS-C) posses totally different sensor sizing.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The HZ35W was released 2 years later than the A350 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Samsung HZ35W being a Compact camera and the Sony A350 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before getting right into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the HZ35W grades vs the A350 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Sony A350

 HZ35W A350 
ReleasedJune 2010June 2008Fresher by 25 months
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution614k230kSharper display (+384k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony A350 over the Samsung HZ35W

 A350 HZ35W 
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display

Common features in the Samsung HZ35W and Sony A350

 HZ35W A350 
Manually focus More accurate focusing
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither comes with Touch friendly display

Samsung HZ35W vs Sony A350 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is intending to carry your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Samsung HZ35W comes with physical dimensions of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Sony A350 has dimensions of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") along with a weight of 674 grams (1.49 lbs).

Look at the Samsung HZ35W and Sony A350 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have at the time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the HZ35W against the A350.

Samsung HZ35W vs Sony A350 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the HZ35W and A350 is 91 and 62 respectively.

Samsung HZ35W vs Sony A350 top view buttons comparison

Samsung HZ35W vs Sony A350 Sensor Comparison

Typically, its hard to see the contrast in sensor sizing only by researching a spec sheet. The graphic here might give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the HZ35W and A350.

As you can see, both cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The HZ35W due to its smaller sensor will make achieving bokeh more challenging and the Sony A350 will result in greater detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics more aggressively. The fresher HZ35W will have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.

Samsung HZ35W vs Sony A350 sensor size comparison

Samsung HZ35W vs Sony A350 Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung HZ35W vs Sony A350 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Samsung HZ35W Portrait photography factors
Sony A350 Portrait photography factors
34
focusing manually
includes face detect focusing
can't use external flash
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
71
focusing manually
MP count good (14 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Samsung HZ35W Street photography features
Sony A350 Street photography features
60
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others in class (245 grams)
no articulating screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
66
has a tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
more heavy than competitors in class (674g)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Samsung HZ35W Sports photography factors
Sony A350 Sports photography factors
42
great zoom range (24-360mm 15.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
includes tracking focus
MP count low (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
66
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
MP count good (14 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports phase detect auto focus
continuous shooting slow (3.0 fps)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Samsung HZ35W Travel photography information
Sony A350 Travel photography information
63
lighter than others in class (245g)
flash built-in
really wide (24mm)
long reach (360mm)
missing Timelapse recording
MP count low (12 megapixels)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
51
MP count good (14MP)
built-in flash
does not have Timelapse recording
more heavy than competitors in class (674 grams)
display isn't selfie friendly
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Samsung HZ35W Landscape photography highlights
Sony A350 Landscape photography highlights
43
focusing manually
really wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
MP count low (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
missing Timelapse recording
64
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
MP count good (14 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
tiny screen (2.7")
does not have Timelapse recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Samsung HZ35W
Vlogging with Sony A350
31
really wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detect focusing
lighter than others in class (245 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing microphone port
9
no video recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Samsung HZ35W vs Sony A350 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung HZ35W and Sony A350
 Samsung HZ35WSony Alpha DSLR-A350
General Information
Company Samsung Sony
Model Samsung HZ35W Sony Alpha DSLR-A350
Also referred to as WB650 -
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Entry-Level DSLR
Revealed 2010-06-16 2008-06-06
Body design Compact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.6 x 15.8mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 372.9mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 14MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4000 x 3000 4592 x 3056
Max native ISO 3200 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens focal range 24-360mm (15.0x) -
Highest aperture f/3.2-5.8 -
Macro focus range 3cm -
Amount of lenses - 143
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Tilting
Display sizing 3" 2.7"
Display resolution 614 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.49x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 16 secs 30 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting speed - 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 5.00 m 12.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) -
Max video resolution 1280x720 None
Video data format Motion JPEG -
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS BuiltIn None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 245 gr (0.54 lb) 674 gr (1.49 lb)
Physical dimensions 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 65
DXO Color Depth score not tested 22.6
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 11.5
DXO Low light score not tested 595
Other
Battery model SLB-11A -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32
Storage slots One One
Pricing at launch $300 $600