Samsung MV800 vs Sony A99 II
97 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40


57 Imaging
76 Features
92 Overall
82
Samsung MV800 vs Sony A99 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 121g - 92 x 56 x 10mm
- Announced September 2011
(Full Review)
- 42MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Increase to 102400)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 849g - 143 x 104 x 76mm
- Released September 2016
- Earlier Model is Sony A99

From Snapshots to Masterpieces: Comparing the Samsung MV800 and Sony A99 II in 2024
Choosing your next camera is akin to picking a travel companion for your photographic journey: you want someone reliable, versatile, and tailored to your style (not to mention sturdy enough to survive the bumps along the way). Today, I’m taking a deep dive into two cameras from very different worlds and eras that still capture imaginations. On one hand, the Samsung MV800, a petite point-and-shoot from 2011, designed for casual snapshots and vibrant social images. On the other, the Sony Alpha A99 II, a powerhouse DSLR hybrid introduced in 2016, aimed squarely at professionals demanding resolution, speed, and raw power.
It's a David vs. Goliath story weighted by time - one lightweight compact versus a mid-size DSLR with cutting-edge tech. Strap in for an equipment face-off that blends nostalgia, practical performance, and deep technical insights. As someone who has tried thousands of cameras across genres and budgets, I’ll share how each fares in the field, who they’re really good for, and where they struggle.
Tiny Titan versus Professional Workhorse: First Impressions and Ergonomics
Right out of the gate, size - and the feel in your hands - sets these two apart dramatically. The Samsung MV800 is pancake-flat at approximately 92×56×10 mm and weighs a featherlight 121 grams. Its compact profile slides easily into any pocket or purse - ideal for travelers and street photographers craving discretion. Conversely, the Sony A99 II commands respect at 143×104×76 mm and weighs 849 grams, resembling a professional DSLR with a robust grip and substantial heft.
The MV800’s minimalistic, slab-like body is sleek but sacrifices physical controls. It relies heavily on that small but surprisingly bright 3-inch touchscreen for navigating menus and focusing, with no manual focus ring or dedicated dials. The A99 II counters with a classic DSLR layout, full range of manual controls, a top display panel for quick status checks, and a fully articulated screen complementing its commanding grip - and yes, it boasts a proper electronic viewfinder with high resolution and 100% coverage.
In ergonomics, these cameras inhabit different universes. The MV800’s minimalist approach suits casual point-and-shoot users but limits manual creativity, while the A99 II’s control-rich layout caters to seasoned photographers who want instant tactile access to exposure, ISO, AF modes, and more. The difference alone can make or break your experience on a shoot requiring fast adjustments.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality: Small Sensor Modesty versus Full-Frame Brilliance
Image quality ultimately hinges on the sensor, and this is the gulf where these two cameras truly diverge. The Samsung MV800’s sensor is a 1/2.3-inch CCD with a 16-megapixel resolution, typical for small sensor compacts of its era. The sensor measures a mere 6.17×4.55 mm (roughly 28.07 mm²). While it hits respectable pixel counts, small physical dimensions inevitably limit dynamic range, noise handling, and detail resolution - especially in dim settings or high-contrast scenes.
Contrast this with the Sony A99 II’s sensor, a beastly full-frame (35.9×24 mm, 861.6 mm²) 42.4-megapixel back-illuminated CMOS sensor. This is a sensor designed to capture breathtaking detail with ultra-wide dynamic range and exceptional low-light performance thanks to BSI tech and no anti-aliasing filter - max native ISO reaches 25,600 with push modes up to 102,400 for extreme conditions.
From rigorous lab tests to practical shooting, the A99 II’s sensor overwhelms the MV800’s small chip in resolving fine detail, rendering subtle tonal gradations, and maximizing color depth (DxO measures color depth at 25.4 bits versus no data available for the MV800, but experience tells us it’s modest). The MV800’s CCD also tends to produce softer images with limited highlight recovery and muted shadow details. That said, its sensor handles daylight scenes well enough to grab decent vacation photos and social media shots.
In practical terms: If you prize ultimate detail, flexibility in post-processing RAW files (available only on the A99 II), and excellent color fidelity under diverse lighting, the Sony dominates. The MV800 is more of an “out of the box” casual camera dependent on JPEGs and automatic processing.
Lenses and Zoom: Fixed Convenience or Interchangeable Power?
Here the question boils down to fixed versus interchangeable lenses - which shapes everything you can do creatively. The MV800 is fixed lens only, featuring a compact zoom spanning roughly 26-130 mm (35mm-equivalent) with apertures ranging from f/3.3-5.9. This five-times zoom covers from moderate wide angles to short telephoto, adequate for everyday shooting and casual portraits. Optical image stabilization is present - welcome, given the slower apertures and small sensor.
The Sony A99 II, on the other hand, adopts the Sony/Minolta Alpha lens mount, compatible with hundreds of lenses from legacy Minolta glass to Sony’s modern G Master series. That means from ultra-fast primes to massive telephotos, including macro and specialty optics, you’re only limited by your budget and creative ambitions. And the A99 II features sensor-based 5-axis image stabilization that works with both native and adapted lenses - especially boon for handheld shooting with telephoto or macro.
Practically, the MV800’s lens offers convenience but limits low-light and creative control - no possibility for wide apertures or selective focus beyond software simulation. The A99 II lets you pick lenses that match your style: portrait specialists can grab fast 85mm f/1.4s; wildlife shooters can deploy 400mm f/2.8 beasts; landscapers can choose sharp ultra-wides.
Autofocus and Speed: Tracking a Face or Panning a Falcon
Autofocus and shooting speed often define a camera’s suitability for action, wildlife, sports, and candid photography. Here, the MV800’s contrast-detection AF system includes face detection and touch AF focusing, but no continuous AF or phase detection. It’s a basic setup good mostly for stationary subjects or casual quick snaps. No burst shooting is available, so rapid sequences or tracking fast-moving objects are impossible.
The Sony A99 II shines here with a hybrid autofocus system featuring 399 phase-detection points (79 cross-type), coupled with contrast detection. This beast can track subjects with lightning speed, pick up eye detection reliably, and boast continuous AF in burst mode shooting up to 12 frames per second - ideal for sports, wildlife, and unpredictable scenes. The high frame rate combined with advanced AF tracking and subject recognition makes this pro forearm-twitchingly responsive.
If your photographic playground includes puppies chasing balls, kids sprinting, or birds mid-flight, the A99 II’s autofocus and high-speed shooting are indispensable. The Samsung is for those who don’t mind the occasional missed shot or aren’t chasing fleeting moments.
Build Quality, Weather-Sealing, and Durability: Can They Take the Heat?
If your adventure includes trekking, inclement weather, or rough handling, the camera’s build and weather resistance are a dealbreaker. The MV800's compact plastic body lacks environmental sealing and is not shockproof, water resistant, or freeze-proof. Its slimness makes it vulnerable to knocks - though it easily fits into small bags or pockets where you might protect it from damage.
The A99 II sports a magnesium alloy body with professional-grade weather sealing against dust and moisture. It just feels solid and reassuring the moment you pick it up. Even after all-day shooting in rain or dust, it remained steadfast in my hands - which is why pros often rely on these reinforced bodies when lugging expensive gear into the field.
So, outdoor and adventure enthusiasts will find the Sony much more rugged and willing to keep shooting under harsh conditions.
Displays and Viewfinders: Where Does Your Eye Belong?
The Samsung’s 3-inch 460k-dot tilting touchscreen is a quirky feature for its time, letting users compose shots at odd angles and interact via touch - innovative in 2011. However, its resolution is fairly low by today’s standards, and the lack of an electronic or optical viewfinder means relying solely on the LCD, which can be challenging in bright daylight reflections.
Conversely, the Sony’s articulated 3-inch LCD boasts 1.2 million dots - a crisp canvas - while its high-res electronic viewfinder (2.36 million dots, 100% coverage, 0.78x magnification) offers a bright, detailed preview for critical framing and low-light shooting without screen glare. The top status LCD provides quick at-a-glance exposure info - a luxury absent on the Samsung.
For precise manual work, the Sony’s viewfinder and rich LCD make a world of difference; the Samsung’s touchscreen convenience rarely substitutes professional framing needs or complex exposure work.
Battery Life and Storage: Keep Shooting or Scramble for Power?
The MV800 uses a small BP70 battery with undocumented battery life, but in my experience with similar compacts, you’re likely to get between 150-250 shots per charge - enough for casual outings but tight for day-long excursions or travel. Storage relies on a single Micro SD card slot - standard, but budget users should invest in reliable cards to avoid hiccups.
The Sony A99 II, by contrast, boasts a robust NP-FM500H lithium-ion battery delivering up to roughly 490 shots per charge under CIPA testing (longer in real-world live view mode). Additionally, dual SD card slots provide flexible storage options - ideal for backup, overflow, or segregating RAW and JPEG files on the fly.
For serious or extended shooting, Sony’s power and storage capacity provide clear workflow advantages.
Video Capabilities: Motion Capture in Two Worlds
In video, the MV800 offers basic HD (1280×720 at 30 fps) recording with MPEG-4 and H.264 codecs. No external mic input, no 4K, and limited control make it only suitable for casual home movies or quick clips.
The Sony A99 II elevates video shooting tremendously with 4K UHD recording (3840×2160 pixels), alongside professional codecs including AVCHD and XAVC S. Crucially, it includes microphone and headphone ports for audio monitoring and manual audio control. While it lacks touchscreen focusing in video mode, its hybrid AF system performs well. The incorporation of 5-axis sensor stabilization further benefits handheld video capture.
If video is a priority, the Sony delivers a distinctly more versatile and professional package.
How Do They Perform Across Photography Genres?
Now let’s shift gears to how each camera fares in popular photography types - remembering they cater to very different audiences.
Photography Type | Samsung MV800 | Sony A99 II |
---|---|---|
Portraits | Pleasant skin tone, decent bokeh but limited aperture control and fixed lens | Exceptional resolution, exquisite skin tone rendition, ultra-shallow DOF with fast lenses, excellent eye detection AF |
Landscapes | Limited dynamic range, modest detail, okay for snapshots | Superior dynamic range and resolution, weather sealed for outdoor durability |
Wildlife | Slow AF, no burst mode, limited focal reach | Fast, accurate tracking AF, burst shooting, extensive telephoto lens options |
Sports | Not suitable due to slow shooting and AF | Designed for fast tracking, high FPS bursts, reliable in low light |
Street Photography | Pocketable, low profile, touch controls | Bulkier but fast AF and quiet-ish shutter (compared to older DSLRs) |
Macro | Limited due to fixed lens | Excellent with dedicated macro lenses, precise focus control |
Night/Astro | High noise, limited ISO range | Outstanding ISO performance, stable exposures, raw support |
Video | Basic 720p HD with no inputs | 4K UHD with pro audio controls and stabilization |
Travel | Ultra light and portable but limited control | Heavy and bulky but versatile and reliable |
Professional Work | Non-starter due to limited features | Fully capable pro camera with workflow & pro-grade file formats |
These practical assessments align tightly with the hardware vanquish outlined earlier. The Sony A99 II is a pro-oriented tool that shines in demanding scenarios, whereas the Samsung MV800 is best understood as a casual, entry-level compact.
Price and Value: Considering the Investment
Here’s the kicker. The Samsung MV800, if found new or refurbished, trades hands around $500 (original launch price), offering an affordable way into digital point-and-shoot photography. But beware: it’s essentially a snapshot machine with little room to grow or engage advanced photography techniques.
The Sony A99 II commands a professional-level investment near $3,200, reflecting its full-frame sensor, rugged build, and expansive feature set. For serious photographers, it represents a value proposition for high-quality imaging and robust performance - especially if paired with a quality lens kit.
For those who demand excellence and versatility, the Sony merits its premium. For casual usage or budget-minded beginners, the Samsung’s low cost and simplicity might suffice, but with many newer and better compacts available today, it feels dated.
Final Verdict: Who Should Buy Which?
Choosing between these two cameras is not just about features - it’s about photographic lifestyle, priorities, and budget.
-
If you are a beginner or hobbyist who wants a pocket-sized, easy-to-use camera for casual outings, family snaps, and social photos, the Samsung MV800 still has charm for its touchscreen, compact design, and straightforward operation. Just manage your expectations on image quality and manual controls.
-
If you are a serious enthusiast or professional shooting portraits, landscapes, wildlife, sports, video, or in challenging conditions, the Sony A99 II will reward your investment with exceptional image quality, rapid AF, ruggedness, and deep customization. Its full-frame sensor and lens flexibility position it as a versatile workhorse.
-
For travel photographers focused on lightweight gear but needing solid image quality, the Samsung might tempt you due to size - but I’d recommend exploring mirrorless alternatives today. The Sony will be heavier but ensures usable images for professional output.
-
Video creators will find the Sony a clear winner due to 4K capability, stabilization, and professional audio options. The Samsung’s video functionality is, frankly, basic.
In closing, using the MV800 as a baseline reminds us how much camera design and tech have evolved over a single decade. The A99 II, still a compelling pro-level beast, straddles DSLR legacy and mirrorless innovation but asks for corresponding commitment.
Testing Methodologies I Use - How These Conclusions Came to Life
Before you ask whether I’m simply parroting specs, let me pull back the curtain on my approach:
- Multiple field shoots comparing real-world handling, autofocus tracking, and ergonomic comfort
- Controlled lab tests evaluating sensor dynamic range, noise profiles, and sharpness using standardized charts
- Side-by-side comparisons in varied lighting scenarios, from bright daylight to dim indoor to night skies
- Extensive image analysis, including pixel peeping on RAW files (A99 II) and JPEGs (MV800)
- Evaluations of battery endurance under active shooting and video recording
- Video tests emphasizing stabilization and focus during pans and handheld motion
- Subjective usability trials, considering menu navigation speed, playback responsiveness, and customization
- Long-duration shooting to assess overheating, UI responsiveness, and reliability under pressure
These methods yield nuanced, actionable insights beyond datasheet specs or marketing hype, grounding recommendations in lived experience.
So, which camera is truly better? The answer lies in your photographic heart and wallet. There’s no shame in loving the peeky, friendly Samsung MV800 for quick captures and pocket convenience, or embracing the Sony A99 II as a trusted partner on your road to photographic mastery.
Happy shooting out there - and remember, the best camera is the one you use, well-matched to your style and needs.
Samsung MV800 vs Sony A99 II Specifications
Samsung MV800 | Sony Alpha A99 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Samsung | Sony |
Model type | Samsung MV800 | Sony Alpha A99 II |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
Announced | 2011-09-01 | 2016-09-19 |
Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 42 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 7952 x 5304 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 102400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 399 |
Cross type focus points | - | 79 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fully articulated |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 1,229 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.78x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/8000s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 12.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.20 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | - | Off, auto, fill, slow sync, redeye reduction, rear sync, high-speed sync, wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | - | 1/250s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320 x 240 (30/15 fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 121 gr (0.27 pounds) | 849 gr (1.87 pounds) |
Dimensions | 92 x 56 x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4") | 143 x 104 x 76mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 92 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 25.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.4 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 2317 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 490 shots |
Battery type | - | NP-FM500H lithium-ion battery & charger |
Battery ID | BP70 | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | Micro SD | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC/MS Duo slots |
Card slots | One | 2 |
Pricing at release | $499 | $3,198 |