Olympus VG-160 vs Olympus VR-320

Let's take a deeper look at the Olympus VG-160 vs Olympus VR-320, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are sold by Olympus. The image resolution of the VG-160 (14MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is fairly close and both cameras posses the identical sensor size (1/2.3").

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The VG-160 was brought out 6 months later than the VR-320 so they are both of a similar age. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before delving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief overview of how the VG-160 grades vs the VR-320 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VG-160 & Olympus VR-320. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus VG-160 Gallery & Olympus VR-320 Gallery.

If you are going to carry your camera often, you will need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus VG-160 has got external measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Olympus VR-320 has dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus VG-160 vs Olympus VR-320 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are using at the time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the VG-160 versus the VR-320.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the VG-160 and VR-320 is 96 and 94 respectively.

Quite often, its difficult to envision the gap in sensor sizing purely by looking through a spec sheet. The graphic below should offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the VG-160 and VR-320.

Clearly, both of these cameras come with the identical sensor size and the identical resolution so you can expect comparable quality of pictures however you have to take the age of the cameras into account.