Samsung MV800 vs Sony RX10
97 Imaging
38 Features
43 Overall
40
58 Imaging
50 Features
76 Overall
60
Samsung MV800 vs Sony RX10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 121g - 92 x 56 x 10mm
- Introduced September 2011
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-200mm (F2.8) lens
- 813g - 129 x 88 x 102mm
- Announced March 2014
- Renewed by Sony RX10 II
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Samsung MV800 vs Sony RX10: A Hands-On Comparison of Compact and Bridge Camera Giants
Choosing the right camera isn’t just about specs on paper - it’s about how those specs translate into your real-world shooting experience. I’ve spent hundreds of hours behind the viewfinder testing cameras across genres, so when comparing the Samsung MV800 and the Sony RX10, it’s crucial to dig beyond their spec sheets and explore what sets them apart in practical photography.
Both models deliver unique value propositions: The MV800 is an ultra-compact point-and-shoot designed for portability and casual use, while the RX10 is a robust, versatile bridge camera aimed at enthusiasts craving DSLR-like control and image quality without changing lenses. Let’s break down how their core features stack up, examining every major photography discipline, technical nuance, and use case to give you a clear, expert verdict.
First Impressions: Form Factor, Build, and Handling
Physical size and ergonomics often dictate how comfortably you can shoot - especially over long sessions or in diverse conditions.

At just 92 x 56 x 10 mm and weighing 121 grams, the Samsung MV800 lives up to its “compact” label. It slips effortlessly into a pocket and feels almost weightless. It’s a neat travel companion, though the slim body can leave you yearning for a more secure grip during active shooting.
Contrast that against the Sony RX10’s substantive bridge-style body, measuring 129 x 88 x 102 mm and weighing 813 grams. It’s a photographer’s tool - substantial in the hand with a well-contoured grip and robust control layout. It feels reassuringly solid but at the expense of portability. Here’s what the top view reveals about control access:

The RX10 features dedicated dials for shutter speed, aperture, exposure compensation, and mode control, along with customizable buttons - a rarity in compact cameras. The MV800’s minimalist approach, designed to streamline use, lacks manual dials altogether, relying instead on a touchscreen interface to access settings, which can be slow when speed is critical.
Bottom line: If portability and pocketability are your priorities, the MV800 shines. For photographers who demand tactile control and durability, the RX10’s bodywork is significantly more ergonomic and functional.
Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of the Camera
In my experience, sensor size and technology form the bedrock of image quality. They influence dynamic range, noise performance, resolution, and lens behavior like depth of field.

The MV800 packs a tiny 1/2.3" CCD sensor (6.17x4.55mm), with a pixel count around 16 megapixels. While respectable for a compact camera of its time (2011), this sensor suffers from limited dynamic range, increased noise at higher ISOs, and relatively coarse detail in low light. The CCD architecture gives it a pleasant color signature but is generally outpaced by modern CMOS sensors.
The RX10 features a significantly larger 1" BSI-CMOS sensor (13.2x8.8mm) at 20 megapixels, nearly four times the sensor area of the MV800. This larger sensor size translates to greatly improved image quality: deeper color depth, superior dynamic range, and much better low-light capability (native ISO range 125–12800 expandable to 25600). Sony’s BSI (Back-Side Illuminated) technology further enhances light gathering and noise performance. In DXO Mark tests, the RX10 scores an impressive 69 overall, a testament to its sensor prowess.
Practically speaking, when shooting landscapes or portraits, the RX10 delivers cleaner, sharper files with richer colors and more details in shadows and highlights. The MV800 produces images that are acceptable for small prints or social media but lack the fine tonal gradations and low-noise performance expected for professional workflows or large prints.
Screens and Viewfinders: Composing with Confidence
Display quality and usability often get overlooked until you find yourself struggling to compose in bright sunlight or tricky angles.

Both cameras sport 3-inch tilting LCDs, but the RX10’s 1,290k-dot WhiteMagic touchscreen provides crisp, bright viewing with excellent outdoor visibility. The MV800’s 460k-dot screen - while touchscreen-enabled - feels dimmer and less detailed, making precise focusing and image review more challenging, especially in sunlight.
Critically, the RX10 includes a 1,440k-dot electronic viewfinder, covering 100% of the frame with a 0.7x magnification ratio. This advantage cannot be overstated for field use: eye-level framing offers stability, improved visibility in bright conditions, and reduces strain during extended shooting. The MV800 lacks any viewfinder, relying solely on the LCD, which limits compositional versatility.
Autofocus Performance: Speed, Accuracy, and Tracking
The autofocus system directly impacts your ability to capture sharp images of moving subjects, which is non-negotiable for wildlife or sports photographers.
The MV800 offers face detection autofocus with contrast-detection and limited AF tracking but does not support manual focus or continuous AF modes. The lack of phase-detection AF and slower processing means autofocus can feel sluggish and hunting-prone, especially in low light.
The RX10, with its 25 contrast-detection focus points and continuous AF capabilities, offers much snappier and more reliable autofocus performance. While it lacks phase-detection on sensor, the Bionz X processor, combined with the large sensor and lens speed, results in more stable and accurate focus tracking - a critical benefit when capturing action or wildlife sequences.
Burst shooting speeds reinforce this difference: the RX10 can shoot continuous bursts at 10 fps, great for capturing decisive moments. The MV800 does not feature continuous shooting - limiting rapid-fire capture.
Lens Versatility and Optical Characteristics
Fixed lens zooms inevitably force trade-offs between range, aperture, and image quality.
The MV800’s 5x zoom covers a 26-130mm (35mm equivalent) range with an aperture of f/3.3-5.9. This is functional for casual snapshots but hampered by slow maximum apertures and moderate zoom reach. Optical image stabilization helps somewhat in reducing shake at the telephoto end, but sharpness - especially at telephoto - is limited by sensor size and lens design.
The RX10 steps up with a professional-grade 24-200mm f/2.8 constant aperture zoom - an extraordinary achievement in a fixed zoom lens. The bright f/2.8 aperture throughout gives excellent low-light capability and smooth bokeh for portraits. Zoom reach is flexible for landscapes through mid-range telephoto and even wildlife at moderate distances.
The RX10's lens also features optical stabilization, complementary to the sensor's performance for sharper handheld shots. In image quality terms, the RX10 produces much crisper, less distorted images with less chromatic aberration than the smaller MV800 zoom.
How They Perform across Photography Genres
I put both cameras through real-world paces across popular genres to reflect typical user experience.
Portraits: Skin Tones and Background Separation
The RX10’s large sensor and wide aperture lens deliver beautiful skin tone rendering and natural bokeh - particularly at longer focal lengths. Eye detection AF helps keep faces sharp. In contrast, the MV800’s limited aperture and small sensor struggle to create background separation, so portraits appear flatter with less subject pop.
Landscape: Dynamic Range and Resolution
Here, the RX10’s superior dynamic range and higher resolution pay off, capturing detail in shadows and highlights with less noise. Weather sealing is an added boon, letting you venture into harsher environments. The MV800's compact sensor compresses dynamic range, leading to blown-out skies and muddy shadows in challenging light.
Wildlife and Sports: AF Speed and Burst Performance
For fast action, the RX10 is clearly the better weapon: fast AF, 10 fps burst, and telephoto reach mean more keepers. The MV800 is simply too slow and limited in zoom reach for wildlife or sports shooters.
Street Photography: Discreetness and Portability
The MV800 excels as a discreet, pocketable companion perfect for candid street work. It won’t intimidate subjects and is quick to grab. The RX10’s bulk and noise may draw unwanted attention, but it rewards you with far better image quality.
Macro and Close-up Photography
Neither camera specializes in macro, but the RX10 benefits from manual focus and a brighter lens, enabling more creative close-ups.
Night and Astro Photography
The RX10’s low-light capability, higher ISO limits, and manual controls enable superior night shooting and fixed-star tracking astrophotography setups. The MV800’s high noise levels and coarse controls limit usability here.
Video Capabilities: Beyond Still Images
While not the primary focus for some photographers, video is a growing priority.
-
MV800: Offers 720p HD video at 30 fps using MPEG-4 and H.264 codecs. No external mic port or advanced video controls. Stabilization is built-in but limited.
-
RX10: Records full HD 1080p video at up to 60 fps with both AVCHD and MPEG-4 formats. Critically, it includes microphone and headphone ports for external audio control, important for serious videographers. Stabilization is excellent and supported in video mode.
If video quality and audio flexibility matter, the RX10 clearly offers a more professional toolset.
Special Features and Connectivity
The RX10 has NFC for quick pairing and built-in wireless connectivity, aiding image transfer and remote control. The MV800, an older design, offers no wireless features, limiting convenience in a modern workflow.
Storage supports microSD in the MV800 versus the RX10's broader compatibility with SD/SDHC/SDXC and Sony’s proprietary Memory Stick formats, offering more flexibility and capacity.
Battery life is respectable on the RX10 (estimated 420 shots), whereas the MV800’s runtime is unspecified but generally limited by its small battery.
Durability and Weather Resistance
The RX10 carries partial weather sealing, bolstering its reliability in varied environmental conditions - a big plus for outdoor photographers and pros on the move.
The MV800 is not sealed against dust or moisture, so caution is advised in challenging conditions.
Summary of Strengths and Weaknesses
| Aspect | Samsung MV800 | Sony RX10 |
|---|---|---|
| Body & Handling | Ultra compact, lightweight, minimal controls | Robust, ergonomic, tactile dials & buttons |
| Sensor & IQ | Small 1/2.3" CCD, moderate noise & dynamic range | Large 1" BSI-CMOS, superior dynamic range & ISO |
| Lens | 5x zoom, f/3.3-5.9, limited low-light | Constant f/2.8 8.3x zoom, sharp optics |
| Autofocus | Face detection, contrast AF, slow | 25-point contrast AF, continuous, fast |
| Viewfinder/LCD | 460k touchscreen only, no EVF | Bright 1,290k LCD + high-res EVF |
| Video | 720p basic video, no mic input | Full HD 60fps, mic & headphone ports |
| Connectivity | None | Wifi, NFC |
| Durability | No weather sealing | Partial weather sealing |
| Portability | Extremely portable | Bulkier, less discreet |
| Price | Around $500 | Around $700 |
Sample Images: Real-World Quality Comparison
A picture is worth a thousand words, so take a look at these representative shots from both cameras under similar lighting conditions:
You’ll notice the RX10’s images retain detail in highlights and shadows with more vibrant colors and cleaner noise characteristics. The MV800 images are softer with less dynamic range but can produce acceptable casual snapshots.
Overall Performance Ratings and Genre Suitability
Our detailed, hands-on testing distilled into expert ratings places these cameras distinctly apart:
The RX10 significantly outperforms the MV800 across clarity, speed, and feature set.
Breaking that down by photography discipline:
The RX10 leads in every genre but is particularly notable for portraits, landscapes, wildlife, sports, and video work. The MV800’s strength lies mainly in casual street and travel photography for users prioritizing size and simplicity.
Who Should Choose the Samsung MV800?
- You prioritize extreme portability - pocket-sized, ready at a moment’s notice.
- Your photography is casual: family events, street snaps, social media sharing.
- You want an intuitive touchscreen interface without juggling manual controls.
- Budget is an important factor - you want a basic but capable compact camera under $500.
- Video needs are minimal.
Who Benefits from Choosing the Sony RX10?
- You demand DSLR-like image quality and manual control in one package.
- Your photos span multiple genres - from landscapes to wildlife to portraits.
- You want to shoot high-quality video with external audio options.
- Weather sealing and ergonomic handling matter because you shoot outdoors regularly.
- You prefer a single-lens solution with a long constant-aperture zoom.
- Your budget comfortably extends towards $700 for an advanced bridge camera.
Final Thoughts: Bridging the Gap Between Casual and Enthusiast Photography
The Samsung MV800 and Sony RX10 occupy two very different ends of the camera spectrum. The MV800 is a lightweight joy for snapshots and travel, offering simplicity and convenience at a modest price. However, it shows its limitations in speed, image quality, and advanced features.
The Sony RX10 stands out as a highly capable bridge camera - an all-in-one powerhouse with control and quality rivalling entry-level DSLRs. For enthusiasts and professionals who want a flexible, durable camera without lens changes, it’s an unbeatable value, especially given the quality of its 1" sensor and constant f/2.8 zoom.
Investing in the RX10 means gaining substantial creative freedom, low-light performance, and future-proof video capabilities. The MV800 caters well to minimalists and casual shooters prioritizing portability above all else.
Choosing your next camera ultimately depends on your priorities - size and ease or performance and flexibility. With my hands-on testing, I trust this comparison will help you make the informed choice that truly fits your photographic journey.
Happy shooting!
Samsung MV800 vs Sony RX10 Specifications
| Samsung MV800 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung MV800 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2011-09-01 | 2014-03-20 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Lowest boosted ISO | - | 80 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 24-200mm (8.3x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/2.8 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Tilting | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 460k dot | 1,290k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | - | WhiteMagic |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,440k dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/3200s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.20 m | 10.20 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320 x 240 (30/15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 121 gr (0.27 pounds) | 813 gr (1.79 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 56 x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4") | 129 x 88 x 102mm (5.1" x 3.5" x 4.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 69 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.9 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.6 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 474 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 420 photographs |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BP70 | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | Micro SD | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $499 | $698 |