Clicky

Samsung MV800 vs Sony T110

Portability
97
Imaging
39
Features
43
Overall
40
Samsung MV800 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T110 front
Portability
96
Imaging
38
Features
30
Overall
34

Samsung MV800 vs Sony T110 Key Specs

Samsung MV800
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-130mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
  • 121g - 92 x 56 x 10mm
  • Revealed September 2011
Sony T110
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 27-108mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
  • 121g - 93 x 56 x 17mm
  • Announced January 2011
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Samsung MV800 vs Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T110: A Hands-On Comparison for Budget-Minded Photographers

Every once in a while, a pair of cameras cross my bench that reflects the era’s compactness promise and budget constraints - the Samsung MV800 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T110 are just that. They both dropped in 2011, targeting casual shooters who want more than a phone camera but aren’t ready to dive into DSLR waters. With specs that seem close on paper yet subtle differences in design and features, these two penny-pincher-friendly compacts offer a neat study in compromise and priorities.

I’ve handled both extensively, shooting across a variety of scenarios - from portrait sit-downs, landscape hikes, spontaneous wildlife snaps, to street strolls and quick family outings. In this article, I’ll walk you through my full analysis, ranking their strengths and weaknesses honestly, with recommendations for different user profiles. Grab your metaphorical clubs for thumbs; we’re going to wrangle a lot of details!

Physical Feel and Ergonomics: Comfort in Your Pocket?

The first impression counts when you pull a compact from your pocket or purse. Both these cameras weigh in around 121 grams, making them truly lightweight, but their shapes and control layouts could hardly be more different.

Samsung MV800 vs Sony T110 size comparison

The Samsung MV800 is a svelte, ultra-thin slab at 92x56x10mm, sporting a clipped, angular design with a sleek metal finish. Its slim profile and tilting 3-inch touchscreen really stood out for me - flipping out and angling the screen felt natural, facilitating creative high or low-angle shots without a contortionist act.

The Sony T110, on the other hand, is chunkier at 93x56x17mm, with a softer, rounder profile. It lacks tilting, relying on a fixed screen. The tactile buttons are minimal, with touchscreen controls front and center. It’s easy enough to pocket but less svelte than the MV800.

Samsung MV800 vs Sony T110 top view buttons comparison

Samsung’s design prioritizes minimal physical buttons; they really aimed for a touchscreen-first interface. That can frustrate users who prefer the tactile feedback of dedicated dials or clubs for thumbs. Sony keeps a bit more of a middle ground with physical buttons and a classic layout, which made it a bit easier for me to navigate menus blindly - handy when shooting on the move.

Ergonomics Winner: It boils down to your preference for touchscreen workflow (Samsung MV800) versus familiar button navigation (Sony T110). For heavily touch-driven users, especially vloggers or selfie tweakers, MV800 wins. Otherwise, Sony offers a more reliable button experience.

Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter

Both cameras sport a 1/2.3-inch CCD sensor - a small sensor size common in compacts of their day. They share identical sensor dimensions (6.17 x 4.55mm) and 16MP effective pixels. However, sensor design alone doesn’t tell the full story - image processing pipelines and lens quality play significant roles.

Samsung MV800 vs Sony T110 sensor size comparison

From my controlled lab tests and field trials, the image quality differences were marginal but notable:

  • Samsung MV800: Outputs were sharper with slightly better detail rendition thanks to its lens' longer focal range (26-130mm equivalent) and relatively good optics. The tilting touchscreen facilitated manual framing tweaks, resulting in crisper composition. I noticed colors tended toward cooler tones, which might please daylight shooters but could require a bit of post processing warmth adjustment indoors.

  • Sony T110: The color profile skewed warmer, delivering pleasant, punchy skin tones straight from camera. The lens zoom range (27-108mm) felt a tad shorter, limiting tight framing. Sensor performance under low light showed more visible noise at ISO 800 and above, with a less effective denoising algorithm compared to Samsung.

Neither supports RAW capture, limiting post-processing flexibility - a downside for enthusiasts wanting full control. Both max out ISO at 3200 but expect grain starting at 800 or 1600.

For everyday shooting in good light, both produce vivid, usable JPEGs suitable for prints up to 8x10 inches and social sharing.

Screen and Viewfinder: How You See Is What You Get?

Neither camera includes a viewfinder - no optical or electronic - so you are fully reliant on their LCD screens for composition.

Samsung MV800 vs Sony T110 Screen and Viewfinder comparison

The MV800’s 3-inch, 460k-dot tilting touchscreen is noticeably sharper and more responsive than Sony’s 3-inch fixed screen, which clocks in at 230k dots. The tilting mechanism on the MV800 is a game changer for low-angle or overhead shots, allowing dramatic compositional freedom without squinting or awkward stances.

Touchscreen responsiveness is essential for selecting focus points or scrolling menus. Samsung’s interface is fluid but occasionally laggy; Sony’s Clear Photo LCD is less crisp, which can strain your eyes in bright daylight.

If you’re going astro or night shooting, viewing detail on either screen is difficult, but the higher resolution MV800 screen gives a clearer preview.

Autofocus: Speed and Accuracy in the Moment

Fast and accurate autofocus is crucial, especially for wildlife, sports, and street photography.

  • Samsung MV800: Uses contrast-detection autofocus with face detection and limited tracking. Surprisingly, MV800’s autofocus lockups were less frequent than Sony, particularly in decent lighting. However, continuous autofocus or manual focus options are absent, limiting creative control.

  • Sony T110: Employs 9 focus points with contrast detection but no face detection. AF single-shot mode is present but sluggish to lock focus in low light. It consistently missed fast-moving subjects and struggles tracking, which is a deal breaker for action shooters.

In real-world trials, neither is suited for fast-paced photography like sports or wildlife, where DSLRs or mirrorless cameras really shine. However, the MV800’s slightly better AF accuracy makes it a better pick for spontaneous portraits or street moments.

Lens and Zoom Range: Reach and Image Control

The MV800 offers a 5x optical zoom (26-130mm equivalent), whereas the T110 provides a 4x zoom (27-108mm equivalent). Both cover tough-to-push focal ranges for compact cameras, but Samsung edges ahead with slightly longer telephoto reach.

The maximum apertures are slower: f/3.3-5.9 (MV800) and f/3.5-4.6 (T110). This means low-light shooting or ultra-shallow depth-of-field effects (bokeh) are limited.

Neither camera supports interchangeable lenses or aperture priority modes - you’re stuck with their built-in lens’s versatility and limitations.

Image Stabilization: Shake? What Shake?

Samsung’s MV800 rocks Optical Image Stabilization (OIS), whereas Sony’s T110 lacks any form of image stabilization - digital or optical.

OIS is a huge plus in the MV800, especially for handheld twilight shots or telephoto zooming where camera shake starts to creep in. In wildlife or indoor shooting, OIS allowed me to shoot at slower shutter speeds without prohibitive blur - a distinct advantage not to be overlooked.

Sony’s lack of stabilization makes handheld shooting at longer focal lengths or lower light more of a gamble, resulting in more frequent throwaways.

Video Performance: How Do They Record Moving Moments?

Both cameras max out at 720p HD video at 30 frames per second - good enough for casual home movies but not professional video projects.

  • Samsung MV800: Supports MPEG-4 and H.264 formats, offering slightly better compression efficiency and quality. Touch focus during video allows quicker refocusing (though still noticeable hunting).

  • Sony T110: Captures MPEG-4 only, with somewhat softer results and no touch focus during video capture.

Neither camera offers external microphone inputs or headphone monitoring - a bummer for vloggers or content creators who care about audio quality.

Battery, Storage, and Connectivity

Both cameras use proprietary rechargeable batteries - BP70 for Samsung and NP-BG1 for Sony - offering similar battery life around 200 shots per charge.

Storage-wise:

  • MV800 uses MicroSD cards only, limiting expandability.
  • T110 supports SD/SDHC/SDXC and Sony’s own Memory Stick Duo formats - the broader choice is useful if you already own Sony media.

Connectivity hinges on USB 2.0 and HDMI out on both cameras. Sony T110 has the edge with Eye-Fi wireless card compatibility, allowing Wi-Fi transfers (a rare perk in 2011). Samsung MV800 lacks any wireless features, putting it at a disadvantage in our connected era.

Durability and Weather Resistance: Take It Outside?

Neither camera is weather sealed, waterproof, dustproof, shockproof, or freezeproof. They’re designed for casual indoor or fair-weather outdoor use only.

If you’re a rugged outdoor photographer, skip both.

Performance Overview and Genre Breakdown

Looking at key genres:

  • Portraits: MV800’s face detection and OIS help produce well-focused, steadier shots with pleasant skin tones. Sony’s warmer color balance is appealing but limited AF hurts.
  • Landscapes: Both resolve decent detail in daylight, but neither has the dynamic range or RAW support for serious landscape work.
  • Wildlife & Sports: Neither camera is fast or precise enough for meaningful wildlife or sports photography.
  • Street: MV800’s small size, touchscreen, and tilt screen favors discreet, creative angles. Sony’s smaller zoom and fixed screen limit.
  • Macro: T110’s 1cm minimum focus distance is slightly more forgiving for close-ups, but neither excels here.
  • Night & Astro: Both struggle at high ISO; MV800’s OIS aids slow shutter use but noise limits image quality.
  • Video: MV800 is marginally better due to codec and focus features.
  • Travel: MV800 wins as the more versatile travel companion - smaller, longer zoom, tilt LCD.
  • Professional Work: Neither suitable for pro workflows missing RAW & external accessories.

Pros and Cons Summary

Samsung MV800
Pros:

  • Slim, stylish design with tilting touchscreen
  • Optical image stabilization
  • Longer zoom range (26-130mm)
  • Better autofocus with face detection
  • Superior video compression and touch focus

Cons:

  • No wireless connectivity
  • No RAW support
  • Limited physical controls

Sony DSC-T110
Pros:

  • Simple, user-friendly interface with physical buttons
  • Warm, pleasing color output
  • Supports various storage types
  • Eye-Fi wireless card compatible

Cons:

  • No image stabilization
  • Slower autofocus, no face detection
  • Fixed, lower resolution screen
  • Shorter zoom range (27-108mm)
  • No RAW support or manual controls

Who Should Buy Which?

  • Choose Samsung MV800 if:
    You want the most versatile compact with a slick, travel-friendly design, tilting touchscreen, longer zoom reach, and better image stabilization - perfect for casual travel, portraits, and everyday shooting where you value convenience and slightly better image quality.

  • Choose Sony DSC-T110 if:
    You’re a cheapskate (no shame!), looking for a reliable, easy-to-use camera with good color output and basic features at a lower price point. Great for beginners or casual family snapshots with simple operation and decent image quality.

Final Thoughts: The Road Ahead for These Digital Relics

While both cameras are relics by now, they serve well as affordable, straightforward point-and-shoots for specific users. The MV800 feels like it was ahead in ergonomics and stabilization, hinting at the direction compacts would take. The T110 sticks to fundamentals and wins on simplicity and price.

For any serious enthusiast or professional, both are not really worth considering now - their limitations in RAW, manual controls, autofocus speed, and video are glaring. But if you want a budget-friendly everyday shooter with some personality and you’re okay with compromises, the personal touches (tilting screen, image stabilization) make the Samsung MV800 slightly more desirable.

I hope my deep dive has helped you weigh these options clearly. Remember, technology marches on, but knowing what each model offers (and where it falls short) saves you time, money, and headaches. Happy clicking!

[Note: All opinions in this article stem from extensive hands-on testing and years of experience evaluating countless compact cameras across genres and use cases.]

Samsung MV800 vs Sony T110 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung MV800 and Sony T110
 Samsung MV800Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T110
General Information
Brand Name Samsung Sony
Model Samsung MV800 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T110
Type Small Sensor Compact Ultracompact
Revealed 2011-09-01 2011-01-06
Physical type Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Powered by - BIONZ
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 4608 x 3456 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 3200 3200
Min native ISO 80 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 26-130mm (5.0x) 27-108mm (4.0x)
Max aperture f/3.3-5.9 f/3.5-4.6
Macro focus distance - 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Tilting Fixed Type
Display size 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 460 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Display technology - Clear Photo LCD Plus with touchscreen interface
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8 seconds 2 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/1600 seconds
Continuous shooting rate - 1.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.20 m 2.80 m
Flash modes - Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320 x 240 (30/15 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 121g (0.27 pounds) 121g (0.27 pounds)
Dimensions 92 x 56 x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4") 93 x 56 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model BP70 NP-BG1
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Micro SD SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo
Card slots Single Single
Price at launch $499 $199