Olympus E-420 vs Olympus E-500
77 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus E-500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Released June 2008
- Previous Model is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Introduced October 2005
- Also Known as EVOLT E-500
- New Model is Olympus E-510
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-420 vs Olympus E-500 Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-420 vs Olympus E-500, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Advanced DSLR and they are both produced by Olympus. There is a considerable difference among the resolutions of the E-420 (10MP) and E-500 (8MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor measurements (Four Thirds).
Photography GlossaryThe E-420 was revealed 2 years later than the E-500 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-420 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving straight to a complete comparison, here is a short summation of how the E-420 scores vs the E-500 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-420 vs Olympus E-500 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-420 & Olympus E-500. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-420 Gallery & Olympus E-500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-420 over the Olympus E-500
| E-420 | E-500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | June 2008 | October 2005 | Fresher by 33 months | |
| Screen dimensions | 2.7" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 215k | Crisper screen (+15k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Olympus E-420
| E-500 | E-420 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-420 and Olympus E-500
| E-420 | E-500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More exact focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither includes Touch screen |
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus E-500 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry your camera regularly, you need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-420 features exterior dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") along with a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) and the Olympus E-500 has sizing of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") and a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-420 vs Olympus E-500 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the E-420 against the E-500.

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the E-420 and E-500 is 77 and 70 respectively.
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus E-500 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor sizing just by going through specifications. The photograph below might offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-420 and E-500.
To sum up, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You can expect the Olympus E-420 to produce greater detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots more aggressively. The newer E-420 provides a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus E-500 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus E-500 Specifications
| Olympus E-420 | Olympus E-500 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus E-420 | Olympus E-500 |
| Also referred to as | - | EVOLT E-500 |
| Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Advanced DSLR |
| Released | 2008-06-23 | 2005-10-21 |
| Physical type | Compact SLR | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 8MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3264 x 2448 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 400 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | - | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | 3 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
| Total lenses | 45 | 45 |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 2.5" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 215 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | 0.45x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/180s | 1/180s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Maximum video resolution | None | None |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 426 gr (0.94 lbs) | 479 gr (1.06 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 56 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 527 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 photographs | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $999 | $600 |