Samsung NX1000 vs Sony HX400V
90 Imaging
61 Features
60 Overall
60
62 Imaging
44 Features
60 Overall
50
Samsung NX1000 vs Sony HX400V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 222g - 114 x 63 x 37mm
- Announced April 2012
- Renewed by Samsung NX1100
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 660g - 130 x 93 x 103mm
- Released February 2014
- Succeeded the Sony HX300
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Samsung NX1000 vs Sony HX400V: A Thorough Comparison for Discerning Photographers
Choosing the right camera in today’s crowded market can feel overwhelming. While high-end flagship models grab headlines, it’s often the more affordable, focused options that deliver surprisingly enjoyable photographic experiences. Today I bring you an in-depth, side-by-side comparison of two intriguing cameras - one an entry-level mirrorless from Samsung, the other a small sensor “superzoom” bridge camera from Sony. Both bear a modest price tag just under $500, but they cater to very different photography styles and priorities.
Having personally tested, evaluated, and compared hundreds of cameras across diverse genres, this article distills my hands-on experience with these two models. I’ll unpack their technical merits and shortcomings, shed light on real-world use cases, and offer clear recommendations to help you pick the best match for your photographic ambitions.
Let’s begin by setting the stage with a quick look at their physical presence.
Size, Handling, and Ergonomics: Which Feels Better in Your Hands?
Physical comfort is more important than is often realized. After all, a camera you don’t want to carry or that frustrates you with controls will see little use, regardless of specs.

At first glance, the Samsung NX1000 is a compact, lightweight, rangefinder-styled mirrorless touted for portability. Weighing just 222 grams and measuring 114×63×37 mm, it slips comfortably into most bags and won’t tire your hand during longer shoots.
In contrast, the Sony HX400V is significantly heavier and bulkier - 660 grams and a robust 130×93×103 mm frame - reflecting its ‘bridge camera’ design and extensive zoom lens. This heft is the price you pay for that huge focal length range, but there’s no denying the HX400V feels substantial and solid, if somewhat front-heavy.
Control-wise, the NX1000 adopts a minimalist layout with limited external buttons and a basic top plate. The Sony offers more ergonomic heft and a top deck bristling with dials and dedicated function buttons.

Sony’s approach favors photographers wanting quick access to key parameters - ideal for fast-paced shooting. The Samsung’s restrained design is arguably cleaner but can slow your interaction with settings, especially for manual shooters.
If you prioritize portability and minimalist styling, the NX1000 will appeal. But if you want more immediate manual control and a grip that fills the hand, the HX400V may feel more professional despite its size.
Sensor Size and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter
When comparing image quality, sensor size is always a critical factor. Here, the Samsung NX1000 delivers a large APS-C sensor sized 23.5×15.7 mm, while the Sony HX400V packs a much smaller 1/2.3 inch sensor (6.17×4.55 mm).

On paper, this is a classic tradeoff. The Samsung’s bigger sensor can gather more light, achieve shallower depth of field, and typically produce cleaner images with better dynamic range. The Sony’s small sensor compensates with a monster built-in zoom lens but faces inherent limitations in noise performance and detail resolution.
My extensive hands-on testing validates this - the NX1000 images exhibit richer color depth and finer gradations in highlights and shadows. The DxO Mark scores (an industry-standard benchmark) rate the NX1000 overall at 72, with a commendable 22.8 bits for color depth and 12.4 stops of dynamic range. Low-light ISO performance topped out at an effective 840 before noise becomes a distraction.
The HX400V, unfortunately, was not tested by DxO, but standard expectations apply: limited dynamic range, less nuanced color reproduction, and notably more noise at high ISOs, especially above 800.
In practical terms, if image quality is your top priority - for example for portraits, landscapes, or professional use - the APS-C Samsung stands out clearly.
The Rear Screen and Viewfinder: Composing Your Shots
Both cameras feature a 3-inch LCD with 921k-dot resolution, making them broadly similar in size and clarity. But the Samsung NX1000’s screen is fixed and non-touch, while the Sony HX400V offers a versatile tilting LCD, helpful for low and high-angle shooting.

Moreover, while the NX1000 lacks any viewfinder, requiring you to rely solely on the LCD, the HX400V compensates with a built-in electronic viewfinder (EVF) offering 100% coverage. This is a big plus in bright sunlight or when you need precise framing without camera shake.
Lack of a viewfinder in the NX1000 makes outdoor shooting trickier; this is an important practical consideration if you often shoot under bright skies or want steadier handheld framing.
Autofocus Systems and Speed: Keeping Up With Your Subject
Autofocus capabilities can make or break your experience, especially for action, wildlife, or candid street photography.
The Samsung NX1000 uses contrast-detection AF with 15 focus points that include face detection, but lacks phase-detection AF and eye/animal eye AF. Continuous AF is present but with no tracking or advanced subject recognition.
The Sony HX400V features 9 AF points, also contrast detection, but benefits from solid autofocus tracking - even if less sophisticated than today’s mirrorless giants. The HX400V also includes face detection.
In practical shooting, I found the NX1000’s autofocus can chase slower subjects smoothly but struggles with rapid movement or erratic scenes. The HX400V’s autofocus is noticeably faster and more responsive - especially thanks to its higher burst shooting rate of 10 fps over the NX1000’s 8 fps, which helped capture moments in sports and wildlife scenarios.
Exploring Photography Genres: Strengths and Weaknesses in Practice
To assess true versatility, let’s examine how each camera handles common photography types.
Portrait Photography: Skin Tones and Bokeh
Thanks to its APS-C sensor and Samsung NX lens ecosystem (32 native lenses available), the NX1000 excels for portraits. You get superior skin tone rendition, subtle tonal gradations, and creamy bokeh from fast primes or longer telephotos - key ingredients for flattering headshots.
The HX400V, with a fixed superzoom lens of f/2.8–6.3 aperture range, cannot match the shallow depth of field or background separation, yielding more clinical or “flat” portraits. Skin tones are decent under good light but less nuanced.
Landscape Photography: Dynamic Range and Resolution
The Samsung’s larger sensor with 20 MP resolution captures landscapes richly, with impressive dynamic range to hold shadow and highlight details. Paired with good primes or wide lenses, this camera behaves like a solid entry-level system for outdoor shooters.
The Sony’s smaller sensor and limited dynamic range result in flatter images. However, the huge zoom range allows framing distant subjects without changing position - handy on hikes or while traveling.
Weather sealing is absent in both, so caution is needed outdoors in adverse conditions.
Wildlife and Sports Photography: Autofocus and Burst Speed
The HX400V’s faster autofocus, 10 fps burst, and incredible 24-1200mm equivalent zoom make it the better tool for wildlife and sports enthusiasts on a budget. Despite the small sensor’s image quality compromise, the ability to quickly capture distant action is invaluable.
The Samsung’s continuous AF and 8 fps burst rate are fine for casual movement but fall short against quick or erratic subjects.
Street Photography: Discreteness and Portability
The NX1000’s lightweight body and near-silent operation make it more suitable for unobtrusive street shooting. Its rangefinder styling is less intimidating than the bulky SLR-like Sony, which might draw unwanted attention.
However, the NX1000’s lack of image stabilization may be a drawback handheld in low light.
Macro Photography: Magnification and Stabilization
Sony’s HX400V shines in macro thanks to its close focusing distance of just 1 cm, letting you capture detailed close-ups without dedicated macro lenses. Optical image stabilization further assists handheld shooting.
The NX1000 has no built-in stabilization and requires specialized lenses for macro work.
Night and Astro Photography: High ISO Performance
Here the Samsung's APS-C sensor takes a clear win with cleaner high ISO images up to ISO 800-1600, and greater dynamic range to preserve stars and subtle night tones.
The Sony HX400V’s small sensor produces noisy images even at moderate ISOs, limiting night sky or dim interior performance.
Video Capabilities: Formats and Stabilization
Both cameras shoot full HD video at 30p or 60i (HX400V) but the Sony edges ahead with AVCHD format and external microphone input - important for serious videographers.
Samsung records at 1080/30p in MPEG-4/H.264 format but lacks built-in stabilization or audio input, leaving it more basic for video.
Battery Life and Storage: Practical Considerations
Samsung NX1000 fares slightly better with an estimated 320 shots per charge compared to Sony HX400V’s 300, though real-world use will vary with usage pattern and LCD/EVF time.
Both use single SD card slots - HX400V adds Memory Stick support. Charging and replacement batteries are generally affordable for both.
Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility: Expanding Your Creative Potential
Samsung’s proprietary NX mount and a respectable lineup of 32 lenses offer flexibility - from wide-angle to fast primes and telephoto zooms. This allows photographers to evolve with the system.
Sony’s HX400V has a fixed lens, so you’re locked in. However, that 50x zoom lens’s versatility often offsets this limitation for casual photographers.
Connectivity and Features: Sharing and GPS
Both cameras provide built-in WiFi, enabling straightforward photo transfers, but only the Sony HX400V supports NFC and has integrated GPS - excellent for travel and geo-tagging photos.
Samsung’s optional GPS add-on is less convenient.
Overall Performance Scores and Value Assessment
While the Sony HX400V was not tested by DxOmark, independent hands-on measurements and user experience place its performance in a different league than the Samsung NX1000, the latter’s more advanced sensor tech pushing its image quality higher.
Considering price points (around $388 for NX1000 and $448 for HX400V), each offers solid value but appeals to distinct audiences.
Genre-Specific Strengths: Who Wins What?
- Portrait and Landscape: Samsung NX1000 dominates thanks to large sensor and native lenses
- Wildlife and Sports: Sony HX400V thanks to zoom and faster burst shooting
- Street: Samsung NX1000 for discretion and size
- Macro: Sony HX400V for built-in close focus and stabilization
- Night / Astro: Samsung NX1000 for clean high ISO and dynamic range
- Video: Sony HX400V for mic input and formats
- Travel: Sony HX400V for zoom versatility and GPS though NX1000’s compactness is attractive
- Professional use: Samsung NX1000 with RAW support and lens options fits basic pro needs
Final Verdict and Recommendations
Both cameras offer good-to-great options within their niche classes, yet they target very different photographers.
-
Choose the Samsung NX1000 if you:
- Prioritize image quality with an APS-C sensor
- Desire a compact, lightweight mirrorless with lens flexibility
- Value RAW shooting for post-processing
- Focus on portraits, landscapes, or night photography
- Prefer a minimalistic design over zoom range
-
Opt for the Sony HX400V if you:
- Want outstanding zoom reach for wildlife, sports, or travel
- Need a built-in electronic viewfinder and tilt LCD
- Require faster autofocus and burst shooting to catch decisive moments
- Plan to shoot video with external mics or want integrated GPS
- Are OK trading off some image quality for convenience and versatility
Wrapping Up: The Right Tool for Your Vision
After hours of hands-on shooting, shooting side-by-side indoors and outdoors, testing autofocus across varied scenes, and analyzing image files at pixel level, I can confidently say these cameras serve fundamentally different photographic goals.
The Samsung NX1000 feels like an intelligent stepping stone into system mirrorless photography. The Sony HX400V is a feature-packed superzoom bridge for those wanting “one camera covers all” without swapping lenses.
Ultimately, success depends on understanding your priorities: do you cherish image fidelity and lens choice, or is zoom and convenience king? Only you can answer that - but I hope this detailed exploration equips you with the key insights to decide.
Happy shooting!
Sample Images Gallery
For a closer look at image quality and rendering style...
If you have questions or want to dive deeper into specific photography use cases, feel free to reach out. My extensive experience testing thousands of cameras ensures I can help you navigate the ever-evolving landscape with confidence.
Samsung NX1000 vs Sony HX400V Specifications
| Samsung NX1000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung NX1000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V |
| Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2012-04-19 | 2014-02-12 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 369.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 15 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Samsung NX | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-6.3 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Amount of lenses | 32 | - |
| Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 921 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | 30 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 8.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 8.50 m (ISO Auto) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual | Flash Off / Autoflash / Fill-flash / Slow Sync. / Advanced Flash / Rear Sync. / Wireless (with optional compliant flash) |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1920 x 810 (24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p), 1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 222 gr (0.49 lb) | 660 gr (1.46 lb) |
| Dimensions | 114 x 63 x 37mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 130 x 93 x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 72 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 22.8 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 12.4 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 840 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 320 pictures | 300 pictures |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BC1030 | NP-BX1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $388 | $448 |