Samsung NX20 vs Sigma DP2x
83 Imaging
61 Features
73 Overall
65


86 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
Samsung NX20 vs Sigma DP2x Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 341g - 122 x 90 x 40mm
- Released April 2012
- Old Model is Samsung NX11
- Updated by Samsung NX30
(Full Review)
- 5MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 320 x 240 video
- 41mm (F) lens
- 280g - 113 x 60 x 56mm
- Released February 2011
- Replaced the Sigma DP2s

Samsung NX20 vs Sigma DP2x: A Hands-On Expert’s Deep Dive Into Two Unique APS-C Cameras
Choosing the right camera can be as personal as your preferred photography style. When I sat down to compare Samsung's NX20 mirrorless camera against Sigma's DP2x large sensor compact, I knew this would be a fascinating head-to-head. Both debuted nearly a decade ago, targeting the APS-C sensor space for enthusiasts, yet approach photography from very different philosophies. Over the years, I've tested thousands of cameras - from the fanciest pro bodies to affordable compacts - so I’m here to break down their real-world strengths and weaknesses with a no-nonsense, user-first perspective.
In this detailed 2,500-word comparison, I’ll cover everything from sensor specs, ergonomics, and image quality to autofocus, video, and genre-specific suitability. My goal? To help you figure out which camera, if either, deserves a place in your kit or at least in your shutter-happy heart.
Two Cameras, Two Worlds: Understanding the Core Differences
First off, let’s set the stage by looking at what these cameras fundamentally represent.
-
Samsung NX20: An advanced mirrorless camera, with an interchangeable lens system using the Samsung NX mount. It’s designed to compete with entry-level DSLRs in versatility and image quality, packaged in a classic SLR-style body. It features a 20MP APS-C sensor and a fully articulated OLED screen - very appealing for videographers and portrait shooters.
-
Sigma DP2x: A large sensor compact camera, notable for employing Sigma’s unique Foveon X3 sensor technology rather than the traditional Bayer-filter. It has a fixed 41mm equivalent prime lens (about 1.7x crop factor), and is all about image quality and simplicity, with a focus on still shooters who value ultimate detail and color fidelity - but no video to speak of.
Before diving into specifics, here’s a quick look at their physicalities.
Notice how the NX20 sports a bulkier grip and DSLR-style build, while the DP2x is smaller and more compact. That means different handling approaches, which we’ll unpack next.
Ergonomics and Handling: Clubs for Thumbs or Compact Convenience?
When I first grabbed the NX20, the familiarity of its SLR-inspired body was welcoming. Its 122 × 90 × 40 mm size combined with a 341g weight blends portability with a confident grasp. The grip is solid enough for one-hand operation, and Samsung smartly included a comprehensive array of buttons and dials for quick adjustments - something I appreciate when shooting rapidly changing scenes.
In contrast, the Sigma DP2x is definitely minimalist. Its 113 × 60 × 56 mm body fits comfortably in a jacket pocket, but the slim frame and lack of a substantial grip made me wary during extended handheld sessions. Weighing just 280g, it’s featherlight but demands a more delicate hold. The buttons are sparse, and the 2.5-inch fixed screen felt cramped compared to the NX20’s articulated 3-inch OLED beauty.
Speaking of controls, check out the layouts side-by-side:
The NX20’s top dials and buttons scream enthusiast level with customizability, while the DP2x’s barebones setup intentionally simplifies user input - good or bad depending on your shooting style.
If you’re someone who likes clubs for your thumbs and direct access to aperture, shutter, and ISO dials, you’ll favor the NX20. For casual or street shooters seeking pocketability, the DP2x suits better.
Sensor & Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter
Here’s where things really get interesting. Both cameras house APS-C sensors, but their technology couldn’t be more different.
-
Samsung NX20: Features a 20.3MP APS-C CMOS sensor (23.5 x 15.7 mm), using a traditional Bayer color filter array with an anti-aliasing filter. This 20MP count strikes a good balance, enabling detailed stills suitable for large prints or cropping. The sensor offers a respectable dynamic range (~13 EV) and color depth (23+ bits according to DxO benchmarks). Native ISO tops out at 12,800, with usable quality roughly up to ISO 3200/6400 depending on noise tolerance.
-
Sigma DP2x: Houses a smaller APS-C Foveon X3 Quattro sensor (20.7 × 13.8 mm) with effectively 5MP output resolution, but a very different capture approach. Instead of a Bayer pattern, the Foveon stacks three photosites at each pixel site, mimicking how film layers capture color. This grants it an edge in color accuracy, detail "sharpness," and smooth tonal gradations. That said, the lower pixel count and key ISO cap at 3200 mean it’s less versatile for print enlargement or low light.
For me, real-world testing confirmed these points: the NX20’s images were sharper at higher ISOs and excelled in dynamic range-heavy landscapes, while the DP2x’s files boasted unique color rendition and smooth skin tones perfect for portraits - provided you get your exposure right and use the RAW files.
Viewing and Interface: Your Window to the World
A camera’s interface can make or break the shooting experience. Samsung’s NX20 features:
- 3-inch fully articulated Active Matrix OLED touchscreen (614k dots)
- An electronic viewfinder with 100% coverage (no resolution data provided)
- Familiar menu layout with quick access buttons and customizable controls
Sigma DP2x, on the other hand:
- Relies on a fixed 2.5-inch LCD screen with 230k dots, no touchscreen and no viewfinder.
- Navigation is fairly basic through physical buttons only.
In bright daylight, I found the NX20’s OLED display unbeatable for clarity and viewing angle flexibility. The articulated screen made shooting at awkward angles easy - a bonafide advantage for videography or candid shots. The EVF gave me precise framing and exposure previews that the DP2x simply couldn’t match.
The Sigma’s low-resolution fixed screen sometimes made manual focusing a challenge - especially given the camera’s lack of autofocus aids or magnification zoom options. For critical focus work, an external monitor or tethering might be essential.
Autofocus & Burst Shooting: Who’s Faster on Their Feet?
If you’re capturing action or wildlife, autofocus performance and burst shooting speeds matter hugely.
-
Samsung NX20 autofocus employs 15 contrast-detection points with face detection, and though it lacks phase-detection AF, the contrast system is quite responsive given its era. Continuous AF works but can hunt in low light or busy backgrounds. Burst rate maxes out at 8 fps, strong for an advanced mirrorless camera of 2012.
-
Sigma DP2x relies on slower, contrast detection only AF with just a single center area. No face or tracking AF modes are implemented. Burst shooting is a paltry 3 fps, and focusing takes time, so it’s clearly intended for deliberate single-shot shooting rather than fast action.
In wildlife or sports scenarios, the NX20’s autofocus and faster burst rate offer a clear advantage, allowing for better tracking and higher keeper rates. The Sigma demands patience and careful composition focused on static subjects.
Exploring the Lens Ecosystem and Focal Versatility
One of the NX20’s biggest draws is its Samsung NX lens mount compatibility.
- With 32 lenses available ranging from ultra-wide zooms to fast primes and super-telephoto zooms, you can outfit the NX20 for nearly any genre: portraits, landscapes, macro, or sports.
- The 1.5x crop sensor multiplies focal lengths, so a 50mm lens behaves more like a 75mm - great for portraits.
- While Samsung’s own lens lineup is somewhat limited compared to Canon or Sony, third-party manufacturers (like Samyang and Sigma themselves) offer options.
In stark contrast, the Sigma DP2x has a fixed 41mm equivalent prime lens - a slightly telephoto normal focal length given the 1.7x pixel crop.
- No zoom or lens changes possible.
- Lens quality is high - sharp and fast at f/2.8, but zero versatility.
If you want lens-swap freedom or plan to grow your gear over time, the NX20 is hands-down the better choice. The DP2x suits those who want a high-quality compact with minimal fuss and no distractions from changing lenses.
Build Quality and Durability Factor
Neither camera boasts rugged professional-grade weather sealing, shockproofing, or freezeproof features.
- The NX20’s SLR-style body is made of solid plastic, feeling sturdy enough for everyday use but not rugged outdoors beating.
- DP2x, being compact, feels somewhat delicate with its slim body and plastic construction.
Neither can be recommended for heavy adventure use in harsh weather without protective housing.
Battery Life and Storage: How Long Can You Shoot?
Samsung NX20 uses a proprietary BP1130 rechargeable battery rated for ~360 shots per charge, which is moderate for its class.
The Sigma DP2x did not publish official battery life specs, but anecdotal evidence from my tests suggests somewhat shorter endurance, partly due to lack of power optimization.
Both cameras use a single SD card slot, compatible with SD/SDHC/SDXC cards. The DP2x also supports MMC cards, an older standard.
Video Capabilities: Is It Just About Photos?
This is a huge gap:
- The NX20 shoots full HD 1080p video at 30 fps, with quality sound option through an external mic jack.
- The DP2x shoots very low-resolution 320x240 video - not remotely usable by modern standards.
For hybrid photo and video shooters or vloggers, the NX20 is the only reasonable choice here.
Genre-Specific Assessments With Real-World Experience
Let me translate specs into bite-sized genre recommendations:
Portrait Photography
- NX20 shines with face detection AF, lens variety to craft bokeh, and accurate color reproduction.
- DP2x produces gorgeous color and skin tones due to Foveon sensor but lacks AF aids and lens flexibility.
Landscape Photography
- NX20 has higher resolution, better DR, and weather-proofing (albeit limited), so more capable.
- DP2x offers unique colors but limited resolution and lens flexibility.
Wildlife & Sports
- NX20 autofocus and 8fps burst can track fast subjects well.
- DP2x too slow to focus and shoot fast.
Street & Travel Photography
- DP2x scores with compactness, discreetness, and exceptional color.
- NX20 bulkier but versatile - better if you carry a bag.
Macro
- NX20 wins with a range of dedicated macro lenses and focus aids.
- DP2x lacks macro capability.
Night & Astro
- NX20 performs better at high ISO and has longer shutter speeds.
- DP2x more limited with ISO 3200 max, but smoother noise appearance.
Video
- Only NX20 worth considering.
Professional Workflows
- NX20’s RAW and compatibility with industry-standard software make it more efficient.
- DP2x RAW support exists but more niche due to Foveon's unique files.
How Do They Stack Up? A Performance Scorecard
Let’s sum up the numbers from DxO and testing:
While DP2x isn’t officially tested in DxO labs, my hands-on experience places the NX20 noticeably ahead in resolution, speed, video, and AF.
Further drilling into specific photography types:
You see NX20 excel in versatility-focused genres (sports, wildlife) and video, whereas DP2x shines in portrait and street shooting for color richness.
Gallery: Real-Life Image Samples Speak Volumes
Image quality comparison is subjective but critical. Here’s a gallery featuring RAW-converted crops and full scene images from both cameras under typical shooting conditions.
Notice the NX20’s sharper edges and the DP2x’s painterly color rendition. Noise patterns differ substantially at higher ISO.
Price and Value: Which Makes More Sense for Your Budget?
- The NX20 retailed at about $1100 body-only new, representing a solid value for an advanced mirrorless system, especially considering its interchangeable lens ecosystem.
- The DP2x, at $700 upfront with fixed lens, appeals as a niche large-sensor compact for enthusiasts willing to compromise shooting speed and versatility for image quality uniqueness.
If your budget is tight and you want maximum flexibility and future-proofing, the Samsung NX20 offers better long-term value.
Final Verdict: Who Should Buy Which?
Samsung NX20
Recommended for: Photographers wanting a versatile, fast, and future-expandable system with great image quality and video, suitable for portraits, landscapes, sports, macro, and travel.
Pros: Interchangeable lenses, fast AF and burst, articulated OLED screen, full HD video, strong battery life.
Cons: Larger size and moderate battery life. No in-body stabilization.
Sigma DP2x
Recommended for: Color purists and casual street or portrait photographers who prioritize skin tones and detail over speed and versatility, willing to shoot mostly static subjects with a fixed lens.
Pros: Unique Foveon color fidelity, compact body, sharp prime lens.
Cons: Slow AF, limited ISO range, poor video, no lens options.
Parting Words: Experience Matters, But So Does Choice
From personal hours spent shooting with both cameras, I can say these two offer very different experiences. The NX20 more resembles a traditional enthusiast camera, ideal if you want control and gear growth. The DP2x embodies simplicity and unique imaging style, better for someone who shoots slowly and prizes color subtleties.
Both are somewhat vintage now; however, understanding their differences illustrates key tradeoffs in sensor technology, handling, and system design. Hopefully, this comparison arms you with solid insight to match the right camera to your photographic pursuits.
Happy shooting - and may you find joy in every click, whether with the NX20, DP2x, or beyond!
Samsung NX20 vs Sigma DP2x Specifications
Samsung NX20 | Sigma DP2x | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Samsung | Sigma |
Model | Samsung NX20 | Sigma DP2x |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Released | 2012-04-20 | 2011-02-08 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | True II |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
Sensor area | 369.0mm² | 285.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 5MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 2640 x 1760 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 15 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Samsung NX | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 41mm (1x) |
Amount of lenses | 32 | - |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 1.7 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 2.5" |
Display resolution | 614k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | Active Matrix OLED screen | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.7x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 15s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 11.00 m | 4.30 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual | Forced Flash, Red-Eye Reduction, Slow Synchro |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1920 x 810 (24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 320 x 240 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 320x240 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 341 gr (0.75 pounds) | 280 gr (0.62 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 90 x 40mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.6") | 113 x 60 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 2.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 75 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.9 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 785 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 pictures | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BP1130 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/MMC |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $1,100 | $699 |