Samsung NX2000 vs Sony RX100 V: A Detailed Camera Face-Off for Photography Enthusiasts

In the market’s ever-evolving landscape of cameras, choosing gear that truly fits your style and needs can be overwhelming. Today, I’m diving deep into two distinctly different contenders: the Samsung NX2000 - an entry-level mirrorless camera introduced in late 2013 - and the Sony Cyber-shot RX100 V, a large sensor compact from 2016 with enthusiast credentials. Both target photography lovers who demand solid image quality and convenience but approach those demands from divergent design philosophies.

Having spent thousands of hours testing cameras across genres and use cases, I’ve examined both these models across a spectrum of photography types and technical criteria. My goal is to clarify their strengths, weaknesses, and ultimately help you decide which might be your ideal partner.

Let’s step through their physical design, sensors, autofocus, shooting experience, and specialized performance characteristics with a lens on real-world usability and value.

Size and Handling: Rangefinder Mirrorless Meets Pocketable Power

Ergonomics often dictate how comfortable and effective a camera feels in your hand, more so than specs on paper. Samsung’s NX2000 follows a classic rangefinder-inspired mirrorless design, aimed at beginners stepping up from smartphones or compact cameras. Meanwhile, Sony’s RX100 V embraces a prime compact form factor, cramming high-end tech into a body sized for even your jacket pocket.

Right away, the NX2000’s larger body (119x65x36 mm, 228g) provides more grip room and intuitive handling for those with larger hands or keen on adding interchangeable lenses. The RX100 V’s dimensions (102x58x41 mm, 299g) reflect a smaller footprint - but note that weight is slightly higher due to more compact, dense components.

If portability reigns supreme for you - say, for street or travel photography where every gram counts - the RX100 V’s pocketability is a huge plus. However, for deliberate shooting sessions (portraiture, landscapes), I found the NX2000’s heft more reassuring during extended use.

Top Controls and User Interface: Simplicity vs. Precision

Before getting into imaging, operating a camera smoothly is non-negotiable. Both cameras feature accessible menus but differ significantly in their tactile control schemes.

Samsung’s NX2000 opts for a no-viewfinder, touchscreen-driven experience, with basic physical buttons and dials focused on beginners. It forgoes an electronic viewfinder (EVF), relying entirely on its fixed 3.7-inch touchscreen for composition and settings, which some may find less satisfying in bright conditions.

Conversely, Sony’s RX100 V provides a 2.36M-dot pop-up EVF alongside a tilting 3-inch LCD. Its control dial and function buttons offer precise exposure and focus adjustments without diving into menus. I appreciated this during sports and wildlife shoots requiring quick, tactile changes.

In short: for those who prefer tapping through menus on a larger screen, the NX2000 suffices. But photographers who crave DSLR-like control ergonomics with the option of an EVF gain much in responsiveness and framing confidence with the RX100 V.

Sensor and Image Quality: Size Matters, But Technology Does Too

The heart of any camera is its sensor and related imaging pipeline. Both cameras feature 20-megapixel sensors but differ in size and design, directly impacting image quality, dynamic range, and noise.

• Samsung NX2000: APS-C CMOS sensor (23.5x15.7 mm), traditional CMOS architecture, with an antialiasing filter to prevent moiré. The sensor’s larger area (368.95 mm²) translates into superior depth of field control and generally better noise handling. DxOMark assigns it a respectable overall score of 75, alongside strong color depth (23.4 bits) and dynamic range (~12.3 EV).

• Sony RX100 V: 1-inch BSI-CMOS sensor (13.2x8.8 mm), relying on backside illumination to maximize light gathering in a more compact format. Despite the smaller sensor area (116.16 mm²), it delivers solid image quality balanced with a versatile fixed lens. DxOMark rates it slightly lower overall (70), with color depth (22.8 bits) and dynamic range (12.4 EV) competitive but lagging behind APS-C.

In practical terms, you’ll find the NX2000 excels in controlled lighting situations especially landscapes and portraits where wide dynamic range is prized. The RX100 V, though, packs technology like advanced noise reduction and a fast lens, helping it punch above its sensor size in low light and general versatility.

LCD Screen and Viewfinder: Composition and Interaction

The user interface relies heavily on good displays - Samsung leans into a large touchscreen, Sony offers a high-res EVF and tilting screen combo.

Samsung’s NX2000 features a 3.7-inch TFT LCD with 1152k dots and touchscreen capabilities but no EVF. This large, bright screen is ideal for composing in live view mode and intuitive menu navigation. However, without a viewfinder, shooting under harsh sunlight can be challenging.

Sony’s RX100 V includes a 3-inch tilting LCD (1229k dots) but crucially adds an OLED EVF with 2359k dots, 100% coverage, and 0.59x magnification. This EVF provides crisp framing, especially for fast-action or landscape photography in bright conditions where an LCD might be hard to discern. The tilting screen is handy for low and high-angle shots, although it lacks touchscreen responsiveness.

Based on extensive field testing, my preference leans towards the RX100 V’s EVF for critical framing, particularly in demanding light, though Samsung’s larger touchscreen does ease quick adjustments and playback.

Autofocus Systems: Speed and Accuracy in Action

Autofocus (AF) can make or break a shooting experience, especially for moving subjects or challenging light. Let’s compare these two carefully.

• Samsung NX2000: 21 contrast-detection AF points, face detection, single, continuous, and tracking AF modes. While the AF system is a bit dated and slower due to contrast detection only, it performs reliably in stable lighting and slower subjects but can struggle in low contrast or fast action.

• Sony RX100 V: Advanced hybrid AF system with 315 AF points including phase detection and contrast detection. This dramatically boosts AF speed, accuracy, and tracking capabilities. The RX100 V supports face and eye detection, continuously tracking fast subjects across the frame.

The RX100 V’s 24 fps continuous shooting combined with its lightning-fast AF made it excel for wildlife and sports photography in my tests. The NX2000’s max 8 fps burst is decent but paired with the slower AF results in missed moments in fast-moving scenes.

Lens Ecosystems: Choose Your Optical Path

A significant distinction lies in system flexibility:

• Samsung NX2000: Uses the Samsung NX lens mount with access to 32 lenses ranging from wide-angle to telephoto and macro. This opens creative avenues but note that Samsung discontinued their NX line, so lens supply has dwindled and third-party options are limited.

• Sony RX100 V: Fixed Zeiss-branded 24-70mm equivalent f/1.8-2.8 zoom lens. No interchangeable lenses but a versatile focal range great for landscapes, portraits, street, and casual telephoto.

If you prize future-proofing your gear system or want specialized glass, NX2000’s mount gives you a leg up - providing you can source lenses at a fair price. For travel or casual photography, the RX100 V’s built-in high-quality zoom lens offers superb convenience without compromise.

Burst Shooting and Performance Ratings: Raw Numbers and What They Mean

I evaluated overall camera performance based on sensor IQ, AF speed, burst shooting, usability, and video capabilities:

Though the Samsung scores higher overall on image quality metrics, the RX100 V’s superior burst rate and vastly superior AF system offer priceless advantages under fast-paced conditions.

How They Handle Across Photography Genres

Here’s a close look at each model’s practical capabilities in popular photography fields:

Portrait Photography

• NX2000 shines with its larger APS-C sensor offering better subject isolation and attractive bokeh, rendering natural skin tones with gentle tonal gradations. Face detection works well; eye AF is missing but manageable.

• RX100 V compensates with a fast f/1.8-2.8 lens and sharp optics but smaller sensor means shallower depth of field is harder, resulting in less creamy background separation.

My take: For dreamy portraits with creamy bokeh, NX2000 edges out.

Landscape Photography

NX2000’s dynamic range and higher resolution yield more detail and highlight retention - plus interchangeable lenses allow super wide-angle options. Sony’s compact design is handy in the field but smaller sensor limits post-processing latitude.

Wildlife and Sports

RX100 V is the champion here - 24 fps burst, phase-detection AF, and fast zoom lens shine in tracking unpredictable action. NX2000’s slower AF and burst make it vulnerable to missed action.

Street Photography

RX100 V’s discreet size, fast AF, and built-in zoom make it easier to carry and deploy quickly - a considerable advantage. NX2000 is bulkier and less suited for candid shooting.

Macro Photography

Samsung NX2000, with access to dedicated macro lenses, supports precise focusing and higher magnification. RX100 V’s closest focus at 5cm is good but limited by fixed zoom.

Night / Astrophotography

NX2000’s bigger sensor and higher max ISO deliver cleaner noise performance for astrophotography. RX100 V’s optical image stabilization partially offsets sensor size limitation but noise is more evident at high ISOs.

Video Capabilities

Sony walks away with better video specs:

• 4K UHD video at 30p, 100 Mbps coding, multiple codecs
• Optical stabilization - highly effective for handheld
• HDMI output for external monitors
• Timelapse support with downloadable apps

Samsung tops out at 1080p 30fps, no in-body stabilization, no mic input, limiting flexibility for serious videographers.

Travel Photography

RX100 V’s compactness, fast lens, and rugged convenience earn it favor for travel when lightweight gear matters. NX2000’s bigger sensor and system can suit those wanting better image quality but at the cost of portability.

Professional Workflows

NX2000’s raw file support, manual exposure modes, and compatibility with various Nikon lenses (with adapters) are support for semi-pro workflows. However, Samsung’s lens system stagnation limits future-proofing.

RX100 V’s fixed lens and limited build features restrict its appeal for professional shooters, but its high-quality images and 4K video help enthusiasts and hybrid shooters.

Build Quality and Durability

Neither model features weather sealing or ruggedized construction. Both are moderate in durability, needing care in harsh environments. Build feels more solid on NX2000 with metal accents, Sony emphasizes portability over ruggedness.

Connectivity and Extras

Both cameras include Wi-Fi and NFC for wireless photo sharing - increasingly important today. The NX2000 supports MicroSD cards, while the RX100 V supports SD and Memory Stick formats.

Battery life: Samsung offers about 340 shots per charge - excellent for mirrorless. Sony’s RX100 V is rated at 220 shots, typical for compacts with extensive electronics.

Pricing and Value: What You Get for Your Money

At launch, the NX2000 was priced around $600, while the RX100 V started near $1,000.

Samsung offers better sensor size and lens options for less money but sacrifices speed and video. Sony commands a premium for its sophisticated autofocus, compact design, and video prowess.

Final Thoughts: Which One Should You Choose?

Here’s my holistic recommendation based on real-world shooting needs:

• Choose Samsung NX2000 if...

  • You prize image quality, especially for portraits and landscapes.
  • You want interchangeable lenses and future system growth (caveat: Samsung’s lens ecosystem is now limited).
  • Video is secondary.
  • A larger, more traditional camera body feels comfortable.
  • You have a tighter budget but want APS-C advantages.

• Choose Sony RX100 V if...

  • You want one powerful camera, pocket-sized, ready for action at a moment’s notice.
  • Fast, accurate autofocus and burst shooting are essential - wildlife, sports, street.
  • You need 4K video with reliable in-lens stabilization.
  • Portability and convenience outweigh interchangeable glass.
  • You’re willing to pay a premium for technology integration and build refinement.

Wrapping Up with Some Sample Captures

To put theory into practice, here are representative images taken with both cameras under varied conditions. Note the depth of field handling, noise levels, and color reproduction.

Samsung NX2000 screen back Sony RX100 V front Sony RX100 V screen back

Notice how the NX2000’s APS-C sensor offers smoother skin tones and richer color gradations in portraits, while the RX100 V performs admirably given its size, especially in fast-moving street scenes. Low-light shots reveal the NX2000’s cleaner shadows but also the RX100 V’s surprising clarity thanks to advanced processing.

Choosing between the Samsung NX2000 and Sony RX100 V ultimately comes down to balancing your priorities: sensor size and lens flexibility vs speed, portability, and video features. Both remain solid choices in their niches years after release.

Thinking about your photography goals - the styles you prefer, how much you move around, and where you shoot - will help you unlock the best fit. Whichever direction you take, I hope this detailed comparison helps you make an informed, confident decision. Happy shooting!

If you have questions or want me to test specific scenarios for either model, drop a comment below. I love exploring gear with fellow enthusiasts!

End of Article