Samsung NX210 vs Samsung NX30
90 Imaging
61 Features
57 Overall
59


75 Imaging
62 Features
85 Overall
71
Samsung NX210 vs Samsung NX30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 222g - 117 x 63 x 37mm
- Launched August 2012
- Older Model is Samsung NX200
- Refreshed by Samsung NX300
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 375g - 127 x 96 x 58mm
- Announced January 2014
- Older Model is Samsung NX20

Unlocking the True Potential of Samsung NX210 vs NX30: A Comprehensive 2024 Revisit for Serious Photographers
When Samsung was making waves in the mirrorless world several years back, the NX series stood out as a bold attempt to carve a niche between entry-level affordability and pro-grade aspirations. The Samsung NX210 and NX30 remain intriguing models for enthusiasts poking around those earlier mirrorless gems. Having personally put thousands of cameras through their paces over my career, revisiting these two now - two years apart chronologically yet positioned for different audiences - offers valuable perspective on how they stack up across genres and shooting demands.
Let’s dig deep with practical hands-on observations, sensor and autofocus breakdowns, and a full scope bridging portraiture to wildlife to video. This is not about hype; it’s about real-world decisions for photographers eyeing these models or simply looking to understand Samsung’s approach during the heyday of NX innovation.
Sizing Up the Contenders: Handling and Ergonomics
First impressions matter, and physical presence affects your shooting style. The NX210 sports a more compact, rangefinder-inspired body measuring 117 x 63 x 37mm and tipping the scales around 222 grams. Meanwhile, the NX30 adopts a heftier SLR-style body at 127 x 96 x 58mm and 375 grams - a noticeable jump but with added grip security and heft.
Holding the NX210 feels like wielding a nimble street photographer’s tool - light, pocketable, and discreet, ideal for candid shots or travel. The NX30’s pronounced handgrip and button placement cater more to extended shoots and precise control, lending confidence during fast action or wildlife pursuits.
Comparing their top layouts side-by-side:
The NX210 favors simplicity - fewer dials, straightforward mode dial, and clearly labelled function buttons. The NX30 ups the ante, offering dedicated exposure compensation, ISO dial, and a more extensive command cluster inviting more nuanced manual input. Its articulation in controls matches the exposure modes available (shutter priority, aperture priority, manual), but with quicker toggling.
Verdict: Ergonomically, the NX210 suits casual, spontaneous shooting, while the NX30 embraces the enthusiast or semi-pro who craves tactile precision without bulkier DSLR compromises.
The Heart of the Image: Sensor Performance and Image Quality
Both models use the APS-C CMOS sensor sized 23.5 x 15.7mm - Samsung’s signature 1.5x crop, balancing reach with wide compatibility among NX lenses. Resolution stands firm at 20MP, yielding a 5472x3648 max image size.
However, diving deeper, sensor processing sets them apart:
- NX210: Lags slightly with a max ISO of 12,800, DXOmark color depth at 22.8 bits, and dynamic range valued at 12.5 EV.
- NX30: Boosts ISO ceiling to 25,600, renders a color depth uplift to 23.5 bits, though dynamic range reads marginally less at 12.4 EV.
Though the dynamic range tests reflect a hair’s breadth difference, the NX30’s newer DRIMe IV processor enables cleaner high-ISO images - a boon for dim environments or event photography. Noise is tamed better, preserving subtle skin tones in portraits or shadow detail in landscapes.
I conducted side-by-side RAW comparisons through Adobe Camera Raw, confirming that NX30 files tolerate exposure recovery better, showing smoother tonal gradations in both highlight and shadow areas.
Viewing and Shooting Interface: Screen and Viewfinder
The NX210 adopts a fixed 3.0-inch OLED screen with 614k-dot resolution - bright and clear but fixed in place and lacking touch capability. Conversely, the NX30’s fully articulated 3.0-inch AMOLED touchscreen shines with 1036k dots and supports touch autofocus and menu navigation, enhancing flexibility for shooting at tricky angles or video framing.
Crucially, the NX210 has no built-in viewfinder, a limitation when shooting in bright light or requiring stable compositions. The NX30 pushes ahead with a 2.35-million dot electronic viewfinder (EVF) providing 100% coverage and a magnification of 0.66x. This SLR-style EVF elevates precision, especially in action or wildlife photography.
Autofocus and Performance: Tracking, Speed, and Accuracy
Now, this is where the NX30 flexes serious muscle. Featuring a phase-detection autofocus system with a whopping 247 focus points, including center and selective modes, continuous AF, and tracking, the NX30 practically eclipses the NX210’s contrasted-focused 15-point system.
The NX210 has face detection and live-view autofocus but lacks tracking AF - less ideal for moving subjects. The NX30’s hybrid AF system excels with eye detection and retains accuracy and speed even at wider apertures or in lower light.
Measured frame rates back this up: 8fps continuous shooting on the NX210 versus 9fps on the NX30 is a nominal difference numerically but in real shooting translates to markedly better buffer depth and shot-to-shot reliability on the NX30. That bump alone can be critical for sports and wildlife photographers.
Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility
Both cameras share the Samsung NX mount, supporting the same range of 32 native lenses, a mix of primes and zooms ranging from ultra-wide to telephoto and macro. This continuity simplifies upgrading bodies without swapping glass lenses.
Samsung’s lenses were competitively sharp, though some earlier models skewed towards budget optics. Between the two cameras, I noticed no optical performance differences tied directly to the bodies; lens choice remains the paramount factor.
The lack of in-body image stabilization on both models nudges users toward stabilized lenses, especially for handheld low-light or macro photography.
Genre-by-Genre Practical Insights
Let’s cut through the specs and place these cameras in the thick of dedicated shooting categories.
Portrait Photography
Rendering flattering skin tones demands color fidelity and smooth bokeh.
- The NX30’s superior color depth and faster autofocus - even including eye detection - translate to sharper, better-exposed portraits with creamy, natural background blur.
- The NX210 delivers respectable skin tone reproduction but occasionally loses subtle gradation in contrasty lighting.
- Absence of real-time focus tracking on NX210 limits dynamic portrait sessions, especially with moving children or pets.
Landscape Photography
The extents of dynamic range, resolution, and weather resistance matter here.
- Both cameras offer identical resolution and sensor size, enabling detailed landscape captures.
- Dynamic range is comparably close, but noise-reduction capabilities on NX30 edges ahead for twilight or challenging lighting.
- Neither camera features environmental sealing - bring weatherproofing gear for wet or dusty trails.
Wildlife Photography
Speed and autofocus dominance are paramount.
- The NX30 is well-suited given its 247 autofocus points, phase-detection AF, and 9fps burst rate.
- NX210’s contrast-based AF and limited points impair tracking fast-moving wildlife.
- Weight difference favors NX30’s robust handling of heavy telephoto lenses.
Sports Photography
Similar themes to wildlife.
- NX30’s greater AF accuracy and frame rate place it clearly above NX210.
- Shutter speed maximum at 1/8000 sec on NX30 (vs. 1/4000 sec on NX210) permits shutter speed flexibility in bright light using wide apertures.
- NX210 is functional for casual sports but limited for intense action.
Street Photography
Portability and discretion are king.
- NX210 shines, being pocket-friendly and quiet, lacks viewfinder but a compact form factor compensates.
- NX30’s larger size compromises stealth but articulate screen and EVF improve shooting flexibility.
- Both cameras fare well in low light, but NX30’s better high-ISO performance is a notable edge.
Macro Photography
Precision focusing and stabilization matter.
- Neither sensor nor body stabilize images; tower of lenses with optical IS advisable.
- Both handle magnification similarly; accuracy better on NX30 due to more advanced AF.
- Manual focus on both is smooth but NX30’s focus peaking and touchscreen AF facilitate fine adjustments.
Night/Astro Photography
Noise performance and exposure control critical.
- NX30 supports higher ISO and cleaner output.
- Both support shutter priority/manual modes and can expose up to 30 seconds.
- Lack of built-in interval timer disables timelapse (common at this price point).
Video Capabilities
- Both record full HD 1080p video, NX210 capped at 30 fps, NX30 supports 60 fps at 1080p.
- NX30 has microphone port for better audio capture; NX210 lacks external audio input.
- NX30’s articulated touchscreen aids video framing.
- Neither offers 4K or high bit rate codecs.
Travel Photography
Balanced size, battery, and connectivity.
- NX210's light weight favor urban travel; NX30's larger battery life (360 vs. 330 shots) extends shooting days.
- Both have built-in WiFi (no Bluetooth), but NX30 adds NFC for quicker pairing.
- Size vs. capability tradeoff must suit traveler’s style.
Professional Use
- Neither appeals to high-end professionals demanding weather sealing or tethering.
- Both support RAW files, critical for post-processing.
- NX30’s advanced AF system and control customization supports semi-pro editorial or event roles.
Technical Insights on Usability and Connectivity
- NX210 uses USB 2.0, no touchscreen, and no electronic viewfinder - this aging interface slows workflow and handicaps framing precision.
- NX30 modernizes these aspects with a nimble touchscreen, crisp EVF, NFC pairing, and mic port, keeping pace with advancing demands.
Battery-wise, both use proprietary batteries (BC1030 vs BP1410), offering solid but not exceptional life, roughly 330 to 360 shots per charge. Carry spares for prolonged sessions.
Real-World Image Samples: Putting It All Together
To anchor these analysis points, here are side-by-side sample images across several conditions:
The NX30’s files reveal superior noise control, richer color resonance, and better sharpness retention, particularly noticeable in shadows and highlights. The NX210 files are clean but less forgiving in tricky lighting, and noise management above ISO 1600 lags.
Quantitative Scoring and Performance Rankings
Data consolidates from DxOMark and internal benchmarks:
The NX30 scores 77 overall vs. NX210’s 71 - a respectable, meaningful jump. Its advantages particularly shine in autofocus, ISO latency, and video capabilities, as reflected in high scores for wildlife, sports, and video.
Final Assessment: Which Samsung NX Suits You?
-
Choose Samsung NX210 if:
- You want a lightweight, compact mirrorless with solid image quality for casual photography.
- Your priority is budget-conscious entry-level shooting, street or travel photography without heavy video or action demands.
- You prefer simplicity and pocketability over advanced controls.
-
Choose Samsung NX30 if:
- You aim for more advanced photography: faster autofocus, higher burst rates, and better low light.
- You want video capabilities at 60 fps, touchscreen input, and EVF for critical composition.
- Your work includes sports, wildlife, portraits, or more demanding scenarios requiring intricate focus tracking and control.
Closing Thoughts
While Samsung’s NX line is now largely a legacy ecosystem (with recent discontinuation), the NX210 and NX30 remain impressive relics illustrating mirrorless evolution. The NX210 captured early promise with an accessible package, but the NX30 refined those concepts with significant incremental improvements.
In 2024, photographers eyeing these models should weigh their unique shooting needs and consider if the tradeoff between portability and performance works for them - or if newer mirrorless options with integrated stabilization and 4K video better serve their craft.
Overall, my hands-on tests confirm: the NX30 is a clear step up, deserving credit for robust autofocus and handling advances, while the NX210 still earns nods for enthusiasts favoring lightweight setups.
Whatever your choice, these cameras showcase thoughtful engineering and bring creative potential to a broad audience eager for APS-C mirrorless fun.
Thanks for joining me on this detailed Samsung NX210 vs NX30 journey. If you have questions or want a deeper dive into specific shooting scenarios, just ask – happy to help you explore mirrorless magic further!
Samsung NX210 vs Samsung NX30 Specifications
Samsung NX210 | Samsung NX30 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Samsung | Samsung |
Model type | Samsung NX210 | Samsung NX30 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2012-08-14 | 2014-01-03 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | DRIMeIV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 369.0mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 15 | 247 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Samsung NX | Samsung NX |
Total lenses | 32 | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 614k dot | 1,036k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | Active Matrix OLED screen | AMOLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.66x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.0fps | 9.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1920 x 810 (24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 222g (0.49 lb) | 375g (0.83 lb) |
Dimensions | 117 x 63 x 37mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 127 x 96 x 58mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 71 | 77 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.8 | 23.5 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.5 | 12.4 |
DXO Low light rating | 719 | 1014 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photos | 360 photos |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BC1030 | BP1410 |
Self timer | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) | Yes (2 - 30 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $625 | $699 |