Clicky

Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill

Portability
96
Imaging
33
Features
21
Overall
28
Samsung SL102 front
 
Sigma DP1 Merrill front
Portability
82
Imaging
56
Features
30
Overall
45

Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Key Specs

Samsung SL102
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-105mm (F) lens
  • 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
  • Launched January 2009
  • Also referred to as ES55
Sigma DP1 Merrill
(Full Review)
  • 15MP - APS-C Sensor
  • " Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • 640 x 480 video
  • ()mm (F2.8) lens
  • 330g - 122 x 67 x 64mm
  • Released February 2012
  • Successor is Sigma DP2 Merrill
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Overview

On this page, we will be contrasting the Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Samsung and Sigma. There is a crucial difference between the resolutions of the SL102 (10MP) and DP1 Merrill (15MP) and the SL102 (1/2.3") and DP1 Merrill (APS-C) have different sensor measurements.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The SL102 was revealed 4 years prior to the DP1 Merrill and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Samsung SL102 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP1 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before we go into a complete comparison, here is a short introduction of how the SL102 matches up versus the DP1 Merrill with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Sigma DP1 Merrill

 SL102 DP1 Merrill 
Screen dimensions2.5""Bigger screen (+2.5")

Reasons to pick Sigma DP1 Merrill over the Samsung SL102

 DP1 Merrill SL102 
ReleasedFebruary 2012January 2009Fresher by 37 months
Manual focus More exact focus
Screen resolution920k230kCrisper screen (+690k dot)

Common features in the Samsung SL102 and Sigma DP1 Merrill

 SL102 DP1 Merrill 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither comes with Touch friendly screen

Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Physical Comparison

When you are looking to carry your camera regularly, you need to consider its weight and volume. The Samsung SL102 comes with exterior dimensions of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs) while the Sigma DP1 Merrill has sizing of 122mm x 67mm x 64mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.5") with a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).

Examine the Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the SL102 and the DP1 Merrill.

Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the SL102 and DP1 Merrill is 96 and 82 respectively.

Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill top view buttons comparison

Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is very hard to visualize the difference between sensor sizing purely by reading through a spec sheet. The graphic underneath will give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the SL102 and DP1 Merrill.

As you can see, both of the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The SL102 with its tinier sensor is going to make getting bokeh harder and the Sigma DP1 Merrill will give you greater detail because of its extra 5 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The older SL102 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.

Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill sensor size comparison

Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Samsung SL102 as a Portrait photography camera
Sigma DP1 Merrill as a Portrait photography camera
25
features face detection autofocus
manual focus not available
no manual control
can't use external flash
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
73
focusing manually
decent sensor resolution (15 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Samsung SL102 Street photography highlights
Sigma DP1 Merrill Street photography highlights
55
lighter than competitors (116g)
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
64
good sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Samsung SL102 as a Sports photography camera
Sigma DP1 Merrill as a Sports photography camera
16
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
48
decent sensor resolution (15MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
can't change focal length (()mm)
does not have image stabilization
doesn't have phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Samsung SL102
Travel photography with Sigma DP1 Merrill
62
lighter than competitors (116 grams)
has built in flash
fast maximum aperture (f)
lack of Timelapse recording
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
wide angle not the best (35mm)
54
decent sensor resolution (15MP)
no Time Lapse function
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Samsung SL102
Landscape photography with Sigma DP1 Merrill
27
fast maximum aperture (f)
manual focus not available
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
screen is somewhat small (2.5")
no manual control
no image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
lack of Timelapse recording
50
focusing manually
decent sensor resolution (15MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (()mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
tiny screen ( inches)
does not have image stabilization
no Time Lapse function
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung SL102 as a Vlogging camera
Sigma DP1 Merrill as a Vlogging camera
30
fast maximum aperture (f)
features face detection autofocus
lighter than competitors (116 grams)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
screen is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 pixels)
lack of external microphone socket
22
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
video resolution low (640 x 480 pixels)
no external mic jack
Photography Glossary

Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung SL102 and Sigma DP1 Merrill
 Samsung SL102Sigma DP1 Merrill
General Information
Manufacturer Samsung Sigma
Model Samsung SL102 Sigma DP1 Merrill
Also referred to as ES55 -
Class Small Sensor Compact Large Sensor Compact
Launched 2009-01-08 2012-02-08
Body design Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Chip - Dual TRUE II engine
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.08 x 4.56mm 24 x 16mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 384.0mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 15 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Highest resolution 3648 x 2736 4704 x 3136
Highest native ISO 1600 6400
Lowest native ISO 80 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 35-105mm (3.0x) ()
Maximal aperture - f/2.8
Macro focus distance 10cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.9 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.5" -
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dot 920 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8 seconds -
Maximum shutter speed 1/1500 seconds -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - no built-in flash
Flash options Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix no built-in flash
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 640 x 480
Highest video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 116g (0.26 lbs) 330g (0.73 lbs)
Physical dimensions 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") 122 x 67 x 64mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.5")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) -
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal -
Storage slots Single Single
Price at launch $130 $1,250