Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
82 Imaging
56 Features
30 Overall
45
Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
- Also referred to as ES55
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- ()mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 64mm
- Released February 2012
- Successor is Sigma DP2 Merrill
Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Overview
On this page, we will be contrasting the Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Samsung and Sigma. There is a crucial difference between the resolutions of the SL102 (10MP) and DP1 Merrill (15MP) and the SL102 (1/2.3") and DP1 Merrill (APS-C) have different sensor measurements.
Photography GlossaryThe SL102 was revealed 4 years prior to the DP1 Merrill and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Samsung SL102 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP1 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go into a complete comparison, here is a short introduction of how the SL102 matches up versus the DP1 Merrill with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung SL102 and Sigma DP1 Merrill. The full galleries are provided at Samsung SL102 Gallery and Sigma DP1 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Sigma DP1 Merrill
SL102 | DP1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 2.5" | " | Bigger screen (+2.5") |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP1 Merrill over the Samsung SL102
DP1 Merrill | SL102 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2012 | January 2009 | Fresher by 37 months | |
Manual focus | More exact focus | |||
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung SL102 and Sigma DP1 Merrill
SL102 | DP1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera regularly, you need to consider its weight and volume. The Samsung SL102 comes with exterior dimensions of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs) while the Sigma DP1 Merrill has sizing of 122mm x 67mm x 64mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.5") with a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
Examine the Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the SL102 and the DP1 Merrill.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the SL102 and DP1 Merrill is 96 and 82 respectively.
Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to visualize the difference between sensor sizing purely by reading through a spec sheet. The graphic underneath will give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the SL102 and DP1 Merrill.
As you can see, both of the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The SL102 with its tinier sensor is going to make getting bokeh harder and the Sigma DP1 Merrill will give you greater detail because of its extra 5 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The older SL102 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Specifications
Samsung SL102 | Sigma DP1 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Samsung | Sigma |
Model | Samsung SL102 | Sigma DP1 Merrill |
Also referred to as | ES55 | - |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2009-01-08 | 2012-02-08 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Dual TRUE II engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 15 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4704 x 3136 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | () |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8 |
Macro focus distance | 10cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.5" | - |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | - |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 116g (0.26 lbs) | 330g (0.73 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 122 x 67 x 64mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal | - |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $130 | $1,250 |