Samsung SL102 vs Sony TX10
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
96 Imaging
39 Features
41 Overall
39
Samsung SL102 vs Sony TX10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2009
- Additionally referred to as ES55
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 133g - 96 x 56 x 18mm
- Released August 2011
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Samsung SL102 vs Sony TX10 Overview
Below is a comprehensive analysis of the Samsung SL102 and Sony TX10, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Samsung and Sony. There is a significant difference among the sensor resolutions of the SL102 (10MP) and TX10 (16MP) but both cameras have the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe SL102 was revealed 3 years earlier than the TX10 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Samsung SL102 being a Compact camera and the Sony TX10 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going right into a complete comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the SL102 grades versus the TX10 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Samsung SL102 vs Sony TX10 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung SL102 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX10. The full galleries are available at Samsung SL102 Gallery and Sony TX10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Sony TX10
| SL102 | TX10 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony TX10 over the Samsung SL102
| TX10 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2011 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 31 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+691k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Samsung SL102 and Sony TX10
| SL102 | TX10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
Samsung SL102 vs Sony TX10 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Samsung SL102 comes with exterior dimensions of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs) whilst the Sony TX10 has dimensions of 96mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 133 grams (0.29 lbs).
Take a look at the Samsung SL102 and Sony TX10 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you choose at the time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the SL102 versus the TX10.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the SL102 and TX10 is 96 and 96 respectively.
Samsung SL102 vs Sony TX10 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is tough to imagine the gap in sensor measurements only by seeing technical specs. The photograph below might give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the SL102 and TX10.
As you have seen, each of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You should count on the Sony TX10 to provide more detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs more aggressively. The older SL102 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Samsung SL102 vs Sony TX10 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Samsung SL102 vs Sony TX10 Specifications
| Samsung SL102 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung SL102 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX10 |
| Also called | ES55 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2011-08-16 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-4.6 |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.5" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 921k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | - | XtraFine LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 2 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.70 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 116 gr (0.26 lb) | 133 gr (0.29 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 96 x 56 x 18mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | NP-BN1 |
| Self timer | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $130 | $309 |