Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba681/ba6812b6e5df39af8b55dc812608daf65a0563e5" alt="Olympus Stylus SH-3 front Olympus Stylus SH-3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86c91/86c91f398b9f08f717ab882683d1c110f571f901" alt="Olympus TG-820 iHS front Olympus TG-820 iHS front"
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Launched February 2016
- Earlier Model is Olympus SH-2
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Introduced February 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview
In this write-up, we will be contrasting the Olympus SH-3 versus Olympus TG-820 iHS, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are created by Olympus. There is a sizable difference between the image resolutions of the SH-3 (16MP) and TG-820 iHS (12MP) but they feature the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The SH-3 was introduced 4 years after the TG-820 iHS which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a full comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the SH-3 matches up versus the TG-820 iHS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus SH-3 & Olympus TG-820 iHS. The whole galleries are available at Olympus SH-3 Gallery & Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
SH-3 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2016 | ![]() | February 2012 | Newer by 49 months |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Olympus SH-3
TG-820 iHS | SH-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 1030k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer screen (+570k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SH-3 and Olympus TG-820 iHS
SH-3 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | No manual focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen |
Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison
When you are planning to travel with your camera often, you're going to have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus SH-3 provides outer measurements of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") with a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-820 iHS has specifications of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Look at the Olympus SH-3 versus Olympus TG-820 iHS in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using at the time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the SH-3 against the TG-820 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79473/794733496717530a37c21700a9fbdebf0f4b967f" alt="Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS size comparison Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the SH-3 and TG-820 iHS is 88 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fda1f/fda1f7277050cff6328e5efb06be9e89bc44bf11" alt="Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very tough to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions only by going over technical specs. The pic here should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the SH-3 and TG-820 iHS.
As you have seen, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different resolution. You can expect the Olympus SH-3 to offer extra detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots far more aggressively. The more recent SH-3 provides an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79301/79301339f04e64f230db84b75c38f2839dcff519" alt="Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/056d1/056d1151dbfd743dd4ada445ff0aade1a7bbc21e" alt="Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications
Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Olympus TG-820 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Olympus TG-820 iHS |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Launched | 2016-02-08 | 2012-02-08 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 3cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 1,030 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | - | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 11.5fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | 3.50 m |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 271 gr (0.60 lb) | 206 gr (0.45 lb) |
Dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 photographs | 220 photographs |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-92B | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $579 | $500 |