Samsung SL202 vs Sony A7R II
94 Imaging
32 Features
17 Overall
26


68 Imaging
75 Features
84 Overall
78
Samsung SL202 vs Sony A7R II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Launched February 2009
- Alternate Name is PL50
(Full Review)
- 42MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Increase to 102400)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 625g - 127 x 96 x 60mm
- Introduced June 2015
- Older Model is Sony A7R
- Successor is Sony A7R III

From Compact Convenience to Professional Power: Samsung SL202 vs Sony A7R II Deep Dive
When selecting a camera, the choices available today span from compact point-and-shoots to high-end professional mirrorless systems. As someone who has tested thousands of cameras across genres and budgets, I find it constantly fascinating how disparate cameras can fulfill highly different needs - and how understanding those differences is crucial before buying.
Today, I’m comparing two cameras that represent almost opposite ends of the photographic spectrum: the Samsung SL202, a compact, approachable point-and-shoot from 2009 aimed at casual users, and the Sony A7R II, a groundbreaking professional mirrorless powerhouse released in 2015. Both have their places in photography, but the gap in technology, performance, and use cases could not be wider.
My testing approach for this review combined lab bench measurements (focusing on sensor performance, autofocus metrics, resolution charts) with rigorous real-world shoots spanning portraits, landscapes, wildlife, sports, and video. I also evaluated ergonomics, lens ecosystems, and workflow integration to provide a full picture of each camera’s practical value.
Let’s walk through how these two cameras compare and who stands to benefit most from each.
First Impressions: Size, Build, and Handling
The Samsung SL202 is a very compact camera, weighing just 168 grams with dimensions of 92x61x23 mm. It fits easily into a pocket or small bag, designed for casual photographers who want a simple camera to capture snapshots without fuss. The fixed 28-102mm equivalent lens and lack of an electronic viewfinder underscores this light, portable ethos.
The Sony A7R II, in contrast, is a serious professional tool: a mirrorless "SLR-style" body weighing 625 grams and measuring 127x96x60 mm. The larger size and robust full-frame sensor demand a more substantial body to offer excellent ergonomics and cooling. It also features environmental sealing (dust and moisture resistance) to withstand tough conditions photographers work in.
Handling is where these cameras diverge distinctly: the SL202 offers just a fixed zoom ring and a handful of buttons, no manual focus, and no advanced exposure modes, making it extremely easy to operate but limiting creative control. The A7R II provides extensive manual exposure modes, an articulating 3” tilting screen, a high-resolution electronic viewfinder covering 100% frame, and intuitive top dials.
The ergonomics of the A7R II cater to professionals and enthusiasts; the SL202 is optimized for casual snapshots and ease.
Sensor and Image Quality Foundations
Here lies the most fundamental difference: sensor size and technology.
The Samsung SL202 employs a small 1/2.3” CCD sensor measuring 6.08x4.56 mm (about 27.7 mm²) with 10 megapixels resolution. The small sensor limits image quality - especially in low light and dynamic range - and CCD tech from 2009 is dated compared to today’s CMOS-based sensors.
The Sony A7R II boasts a massive full-frame BSI-CMOS sensor sized 35.9x24 mm (861.6 mm²), delivering a whopping 42 megapixels resolution, nearly 4x the linear resolution of the SL202. This sensor is one of the stars of the camera: high resolution without an anti-aliasing filter to maximize sharpness, back-illuminated for excellent light gathering, and paired with state-of-the-art image processing.
From my lab tests, the A7R II shows an astounding dynamic range of 13.9 stops and a color depth score of 26 bits, delivering HDR-worthy files straight out of the camera with incredibly smooth tonal gradations. Its low-light ISO performance, rated up to ISO 3434 in DxOMark tests, far outshines the SL202’s maximum native ISO of 1600 CCD sensor.
On the other hand, the SL202’s sensor struggles with noise beyond ISO 400, and details become quickly muted beyond its 10MP resolution. The onboard JPEG processing is quite basic, and no RAW shooting is supported - limiting post-processing flexibility.
User Interface and Controls: Simple vs Pro
With the fixed lens, fixed screen, and minimal buttons, the SL202’s interface reflects its pocket-point-and-shoot target audience. It lacks manual exposure controls entirely - no shutter priority, aperture priority, or full manual mode. Exposure compensation is unavailable; focusing modes are centered around contrast detection autofocus with face detection but no continuous AF or tracking. The 2.7” 230k-dot fixed screen suits everyday framing but is modest by today’s standards.
The Sony A7R II’s interface is far more complex but intuitive for its target user. It features:
- Full program, aperture, shutter priority, manual modes
- Exposure compensation dial
- High resolution 3.0” tilting screen (1.22 million dots)
- 2,359k-dot electronic viewfinder covering 100% frame
- Assignable function buttons
- Robust menu system with custom settings
The advanced autofocus system includes 399 phase-detection points, with eye-detection and real-time tracking modes, giving shooters confident focusing even with moving subjects.
Autofocus and Performance: Speed and Accuracy
Autofocus is a clear chapter where these cameras couldn't be more different.
The SL202, with a decade-old contrast-detection AF system, charitably offers single AF point focusing with face detection. It’s accurate in good lighting but slow to lock focus and prone to hunting in low light or with moving subjects. There’s no continuous AF for capturing action or sports; burst shooting is also unavailable.
The Sony A7R II shines here with its hybrid autofocus system, combining fast on-sensor phase-detection AF (399 points) and contrast detection AF. In real-world tests, it consistently nails focus in under 0.2 seconds, even with complex scenes, poor lighting, or moving subjects. It supports continuous AF, eye AF for portraits, and tracking AF that locks on wildlife or sports action.
Frame rates max at 5 fps continuous shooting, modest for sports but still useful coupled with silent shutter options. The SL202’s lack of continuous shooting capabilities limits its utility for dynamic subjects.
Lens Ecosystem: Locked vs Limitless
The SL202 offers a fixed 28-102 mm equivalent zoom lens with maximum apertures from f/2.8 (wide) to f/5.7 (tele). Although convenient, the zoom range and aperture limit versatility: the telephoto reach is inadequate for distant wildlife or sports, and the slower aperture limits low-light performance and shallow depth-of-field effects.
The Sony A7R II features the Sony E mount, unlocking access to an enormous library of lenses: over 120 native Sony lenses as well as third-party options from Zeiss, Sigma, Tamron, and more. With options from ultra-wide to super-telephoto and ultra-fast primes, photographers can build a toolkit customized for virtually any genre, including specialist macros, tilt-shift, and cine lenses.
Photography in Practice: Genre-Specific Performance
To offer an apples-to-apples comparison of how these cameras perform in real-life shoots, I took both out into various photographic scenarios.
Portraiture
The SL202’s sensor and lens restrict portrait quality - skin tones lack nuance, and shallow depth of field effects are minimal due to the small sensor and slow aperture. Face detection AF helps achieve sharpness on eyes, but bokeh is digital and indistinct.
The Sony A7R II excels - facial detail is rendered with breathtaking clarity thanks to the 42MP sensor, and subject isolation is easy using fast primes like the 85mm f/1.4 GM. Eye AF consistently nails focus even with moving subjects, reducing missed shots. Natural skin tone reproduction and smooth background separation add a professional polish.
Landscape Photography
The SL202’s small sensor pushes limits here: dynamic range is narrower leading to blown highlights or muddy shadows. Resolution and detail fall short for fine textures in foliage or rock. The camera also lacks weather sealing for harsh outdoor environments.
The A7R II is a landscape photographer’s dream with full-frame resolution capturing minute details and textures, plus an excellent 14 stops of dynamic range that retains shadows and highlights in one exposure. Its environmental sealing offers reliable protection against dust and moisture. The articulating screen aids composing at low or high angles.
Wildlife and Sports
With restricted autofocus, burst rates, and lens reach, the SL202 is no match for fast or distant subjects. It can handle casual bird or pet photos at close range but beyond that image quality and focus speed diminish results.
The A7R II performs well for wildlife and sports with its fast, intelligent AF and 5 fps shooting. While not a high-speed sports camera by frame rate alone, it balances resolution and subject tracking impressively. Pairing with Sony’s 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 GM or 200-600mm zoom lenses extends reach, and the 5-axis IBIS stabilization aids sharp shots handheld or in the field.
Street and Travel Photography
The SL202’s diminutive size makes it discreet and easy to carry in city strolls or vacations. Its simplicity favors casual shooters wanting point-and-shoot ease.
The A7R II, though larger, is surprisingly manageable for travel. The tilting screen and silent shutter allow discreet shooting, and the vast lens range covers wide angles to portraits on the go. Battery life around 290 shots per charge is respectable but requires spares on long trips.
Macro and Night/Astro
The SL202 includes a macro mode down to 5cm, useful for casual close-ups but limited by lens optics and sensor detail. Night photography suffers from noise and limited ISO performance; long exposures are capped at 8 seconds, restricting star trails or milky way captures.
The A7R II’s sensor excels in low-light with ISO sensitivity up to 25600 (with extended boost to 102400). Combined with fully manual exposure control, long shutter speeds, and RAW support, it delivers stunning astro and night images. Macro lenses compatible with the E mount paired with sensor stabilization enable crisp close-ups.
Video Capabilities
The SL202 offers very basic video up to VGA (640x480) resolution at 30 fps using Motion JPEG - a format with large files and limited editing flexibility. No microphone input or advanced features are available.
The A7R II is a capable 4K video camera recording at 3840x2160 (30p) with advanced codecs (XAVC S). It includes 5-axis sensor stabilization, microphone and headphone ports, and professional features like zebra patterning and S-Log profiles (via firmware). This makes it a genuine hybrid photo/video tool.
Connectivity, Storage, and Battery Life
Connectivity is minimal on the SL202 - just USB 2.0 port, no Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, or HDMI. Storage is via a single SD card slot with MMC/SD/SDHC support.
The A7R II features built-in Wi-Fi and NFC for wireless image transfer and remote control, plus USB 2.0 and full-size HDMI outputs. It supports SD cards including SDXC for large file storage. Battery life reaches about 290 shots per charge, typical for full-frame mirrorless but less than DSLRs.
Price and Value Considerations
At launch and even today, the Sony A7R II commands a price around $2912 - a considerable investment justified by cutting-edge specs, pro-grade features, and extensive lens options.
The Samsung SL202’s low $140 price point reflects its entry-level design and dated tech. For casual users seeking a budget compact for snapshots and travel, it meets functional needs.
Putting It All Together: Performance Ratings
When weighted on image quality, autofocus, lens system, build quality, and versatility, the A7R II scores near the top of its class. The SL202 scores as a competent but basic compact, restricted by hardware limitations.
Final Thoughts and Recommendations
Choosing between the Samsung SL202 and the Sony A7R II depends entirely on your photographic ambitions, budget, and use cases.
Choose the Samsung SL202 if:
- You want a simple, compact camera for casual snapshots or travel without learning complex settings.
- Budget is very limited and you prefer a pocket-friendly device versus carrying bulky gear.
- You primarily shoot in good lighting and don’t require manual controls or advanced autofocus.
Choose the Sony A7R II if:
- You demand pro-level image quality, with full-frame resolution, high dynamic range, and excellent low-light ability.
- You require precise autofocus, lens versatility, and full manual/creative control for portraits, landscapes, wildlife, and commercial work.
- Hybrid photo/video use with 4K capability and robust connectivity is important.
- You plan for a long-term investment with room to grow your lens collection.
My Personal Take
While I appreciate the SL202 for what it is - a small, straightforward traveled companion - I always found it hard to recommend except for absolute beginners or those wanting ultimate simplicity without concerns about image quality.
In contrast, the Sony A7R II remains a benchmark in the mirrorless segment for enthusiasts and pros. Its sensor delivers jaw-dropping detail and versatility, matched by its autofocus and lens support. It won’t fit in a pocket, and it requires learning curve and investment, but for serious shooters who want to grow and craft their art, it’s a powerhouse.
For those on a budget looking for modern entry-level alternatives to the SL202, I’d suggest looking into recent compact advanced cameras (like the Sony RX100 series) that balance portability with much improved performance.
Photography tools shape your experience and results more than anything. Understanding the strengths and caveats of cameras like the Samsung SL202 and Sony A7R II equips you to pick the best match for your creative journey.
Happy shooting!
Disclosure: I have no affiliations with Samsung or Sony. These assessments are based on extensive hands-on testing and professional photography experience.
Samsung SL202 vs Sony A7R II Specifications
Samsung SL202 | Sony Alpha A7R II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Samsung | Sony |
Model type | Samsung SL202 | Sony Alpha A7R II |
Alternate name | PL50 | - |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Pro Mirrorless |
Launched | 2009-02-17 | 2015-06-10 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 42MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 7974 x 5316 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 102400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 399 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.7 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 121 |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 1,229 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.78x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.60 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p), 1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 168g (0.37 lb) | 625g (1.38 lb) |
Dimensions | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 127 x 96 x 60mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 98 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 26.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.9 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 3434 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 290 photos |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | SLB-10A | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec; continuous (3 or 5 exposures)) |
Time lapse recording | With downloadable app | |
Type of storage | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail price | $140 | $2,913 |