Samsung SL202 vs Sony A900
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
54 Imaging
67 Features
62 Overall
65
Samsung SL202 vs Sony A900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Revealed February 2009
- Additionally referred to as PL50
(Full Review)
- 25MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 895g - 156 x 117 x 82mm
- Introduced October 2008
- New Model is Sony A99
Samsung SL202 vs Sony A900 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Samsung SL202 vs Sony A900, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Samsung and Sony. There is a considerable difference among the resolutions of the SL202 (10MP) and A900 (25MP) and the SL202 (1/2.3") and A900 (Full frame) feature totally different sensor dimensions.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe SL202 was manufactured 4 months after the A900 and they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Samsung SL202 being a Compact camera and the Sony A900 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before going in to a complete comparison, below is a brief overview of how the SL202 matches up versus the A900 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung SL202 vs Sony A900 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung SL202 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A900. The entire galleries are viewable at Samsung SL202 Gallery & Sony A900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Sony A900
SL202 | A900 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A900 over the Samsung SL202
A900 | SL202 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More accurate focusing | |||
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 922k | 230k | Crisper display (+692k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung SL202 and Sony A900
SL202 | A900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2009 | October 2008 | Same age | |
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Samsung SL202 vs Sony A900 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and measurements. The Samsung SL202 provides outside dimensions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) whilst the Sony A900 has proportions of 156mm x 117mm x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") accompanied by a weight of 895 grams (1.97 lbs).
Look at the Samsung SL202 vs Sony A900 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the SL202 and the A900.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the SL202 and A900 is 94 and 54 respectively.
Samsung SL202 vs Sony A900 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is hard to envision the contrast in sensor dimensions only by viewing specs. The pic underneath should give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the SL202 and A900.
All in all, both of the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The SL202 featuring a smaller sensor will make achieving bokeh tougher and the Sony A900 will render more detail due to its extra 15MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics a little more aggressively.
Samsung SL202 vs Sony A900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung SL202 vs Sony A900 Specifications
Samsung SL202 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Samsung | Sony |
Model | Samsung SL202 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 |
Also referred to as | PL50 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
Revealed | 2009-02-17 | 2008-10-22 |
Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 25 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 6048 x 4032 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.7 | - |
Macro focus range | 5cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 922k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | - | TFT Xtra Fine color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.60 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/250 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | None |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 168g (0.37 lb) | 895g (1.97 lb) |
Dimensions | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 156 x 117 x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 79 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1431 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 880 images |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | SLB-10A | NP-FM500H |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal | Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32 |
Card slots | One | Two |
Price at launch | $140 | $2,736 |