Samsung SL620 vs Samsung WB850F
94 Imaging
34 Features
13 Overall
25
91 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Samsung SL620 vs Samsung WB850F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-175mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Released February 2009
- Additionally referred to as PL65
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 250g - 109 x 62 x 25mm
- Introduced January 2012
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Samsung SL620 vs Samsung WB850F Overview
Following is a in depth overview of the Samsung SL620 versus Samsung WB850F, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both created by Samsung. There exists a huge gap between the image resolutions of the SL620 (12MP) and WB850F (16MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe SL620 was manufactured 3 years prior to the WB850F which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Samsung SL620 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB850F being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a short overview of how the SL620 grades vs the WB850F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Samsung SL620 vs Samsung WB850F Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung SL620 and Samsung WB850F. The entire galleries are provided at Samsung SL620 Gallery and Samsung WB850F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL620 over the Samsung WB850F
| SL620 | WB850F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB850F over the Samsung SL620
| WB850F | SL620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2012 |  | February 2009 | More modern by 35 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 614k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung SL620 and Samsung WB850F
| SL620 | WB850F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Samsung SL620 vs Samsung WB850F Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera regularly, you should consider its weight and dimensions. The Samsung SL620 offers outer measurements of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB850F has dimensions of 109mm x 62mm x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0") with a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
Check out the Samsung SL620 versus Samsung WB850F in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have at the time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the SL620 versus the WB850F.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SL620 and WB850F is 94 and 91 respectively.
Samsung SL620 vs Samsung WB850F Sensor Comparison
Typically, its hard to see the contrast between sensor sizes purely by reading a spec sheet. The pic underneath may offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the SL620 and WB850F.
Clearly, the two cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You should expect to see the Samsung WB850F to deliver more detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more aged SL620 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Samsung SL620 vs Samsung WB850F Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Samsung SL620 vs Samsung WB850F Specifications
| Samsung SL620 | Samsung WB850F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Samsung | Samsung |
| Model | Samsung SL620 | Samsung WB850F |
| Also called as | PL65 | - |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2009-02-17 | 2012-01-09 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-175mm (5.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.7 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 614k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | - | AMOLED display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.60 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 168 gr (0.37 lb) | 250 gr (0.55 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 109 x 62 x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $200 | $599 |