Samsung SL620 vs Sigma SD9
94 Imaging
34 Features
13 Overall
25
54 Imaging
39 Features
27 Overall
34
Samsung SL620 vs Sigma SD9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-175mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Announced February 2009
- Alternative Name is PL65
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Revealed November 2002
- Replacement is Sigma SD10
Samsung SL620 vs Sigma SD9 Overview
Here is a extended review of the Samsung SL620 vs Sigma SD9, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Samsung and Sigma. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the SL620 (12MP) and SD9 (3MP) and the SL620 (1/2.3") and SD9 (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe SL620 was brought out 6 years later than the SD9 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Samsung SL620 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma SD9 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before we go through a more detailed comparison, below is a short view of how the SL620 scores against the SD9 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung SL620 vs Sigma SD9 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung SL620 & Sigma SD9. The entire galleries are viewable at Samsung SL620 Gallery & Sigma SD9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL620 over the Sigma SD9
SL620 | SD9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2009 | November 2002 | Fresher by 76 months | |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+0.9") | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 130k | Clearer screen (+100k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD9 over the Samsung SL620
SD9 | SL620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very exact focusing |
Common features in the Samsung SL620 and Sigma SD9
SL620 | SD9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | No Touch friendly screen |
Samsung SL620 vs Sigma SD9 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry your camera often, you are going to need to consider its weight and proportions. The Samsung SL620 has got external dimensions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) while the Sigma SD9 has measurements of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") accompanied by a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
Take a look at the Samsung SL620 vs Sigma SD9 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using at the time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the SL620 compared to the SD9.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the SL620 and SD9 is 94 and 54 respectively.
Samsung SL620 vs Sigma SD9 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to visualise the gap in sensor sizing only by researching specs. The graphic underneath will give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the SL620 and SD9.
All in all, the two cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The SL620 featuring a smaller sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field harder and the Samsung SL620 will provide you with greater detail having its extra 9 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The newer SL620 will have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Samsung SL620 vs Sigma SD9 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung SL620 vs Sigma SD9 Specifications
Samsung SL620 | Sigma SD9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Samsung | Sigma |
Model | Samsung SL620 | Sigma SD9 |
Alternate name | PL65 | - |
Category | Ultracompact | Advanced DSLR |
Announced | 2009-02-17 | 2002-11-26 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 285.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 3 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 2268 x 1512 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens focal range | 35-175mm (5.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/2.8-5.7 | - |
Macro focus range | 5cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 76 |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 1.7 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inches | 1.8 inches |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 130k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 98 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.77x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/6000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.60 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | None |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 168 gr (0.37 lb) | 950 gr (2.09 lb) |
Dimensions | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes | Yes (10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal | Compact Flash Type I or II |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $200 | $3,001 |