Clicky

Samsung ST150F vs Sony A7R III

Portability
96
Imaging
39
Features
30
Overall
35
Samsung ST150F front
 
Sony Alpha A7R III front
Portability
63
Imaging
77
Features
93
Overall
83

Samsung ST150F vs Sony A7R III Key Specs

Samsung ST150F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
  • 114g - 94 x 58 x 18mm
  • Revealed January 2013
Sony A7R III
(Full Review)
  • 42MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 32000 (Bump to 102400)
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 657g - 127 x 96 x 74mm
  • Introduced October 2017
  • Previous Model is Sony A7R II
  • Refreshed by Sony A7R IV
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Comparing the Samsung ST150F and Sony A7R III: A Comprehensive Performance and Usability Analysis

When selecting a digital camera - especially with the nearly decade-wide gap between the 2013 Samsung ST150F and the 2017 Sony A7R III - buyers must navigate significant technological advancements and distinct use paradigms. Both cameras cater to radically different segments within photography yet remain of interest: the Samsung ST150F represents the compact, consumer-friendly end, while the Sony A7R III epitomizes pro-level mirrorless camera design with impressive resolution and versatility.

This detailed comparative review leverages extensive hands-on testing, technical benchmarks, and use case scenarios across all photography genres, enabling enthusiasts and professionals alike to understand what each system delivers in the real world. We also analyze ergonomics, autofocus behaviors, sensor performance, and video capabilities, ultimately providing clear purchase recommendations aligned with user priorities and budgets.

Samsung ST150F vs Sony A7R III size comparison

Understanding the Core Design Philosophies: Compact Simplicity vs. Professional Power

The Samsung ST150F is a straightforward point-and-shoot designed primarily for casual users who prioritize portability and simplicity. It features a slim profile, fixed 25-125mm equivalent zoom lens, and a minimal control layout with no access to manual exposure modes. With a limited CCD sensor, it aims for ease rather than cutting-edge image quality or customization, delivering 16MP max resolution JPEG images only and built-in flash for low-light convenience.

In stark contrast, the Sony A7R III embodies a mirrorless, full-frame powerhouse intended for demanding photographers who require high-resolution stills, advanced autofocus systems, and extensive creative control. It supports interchangeable E-mount lenses with over 120 compatible options, has a 42.4MP BSI CMOS sensor with no anti-aliasing filter (maximizing detail), and features full manual, aperture, shutter, and exposure priority modes. Weather sealing and robust build quality further underline its professional orientation.

Samsung ST150F vs Sony A7R III top view buttons comparison

The physical dimension disparity is striking: the Samsung ST150F weighs a dainty 114 grams with a compact 94x58x18mm footprint, while the Sony A7R III's body measures a substantial 127x96x74mm and weighs 657 grams - reflecting its more robust mechanics and battery capacity.

Sensor Characteristics and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter

Sensor size and technology have a profound impact on image quality, dynamic range, and noise handling. The Samsung ST150F’s modest 1/2.3” CCD sensor (6.17 x 4.55mm, 28.07 mm² area) yields maximum images at 4608x3456 pixels (roughly 16MP). While sufficient for casual snapshots, this sensor is limited for low-light performance or fine detail reproduction due to its small photosites and CCD architecture dating from a previous generation of imaging technology.

Conversely, the Sony A7R III features a 35.9 x 24mm, 42.4MP full-frame BSI CMOS sensor (861.6 mm² area), offering dramatically improved dynamic range (measured at 14.7 EV stops in laboratory testing), exceptional color depth, and excellent noise performance up to high ISO levels (native ISO range 100–32,000, expandable to 50–102,400). The lack of an anti-aliasing filter optimizes sharpness and resolving power - an essential advantage for landscapes, portraits, and professional applications demanding pixel-level detail.

Samsung ST150F vs Sony A7R III sensor size comparison

This difference in sensor architecture manifests clearly in image fidelity: the Samsung’s JPEG images tend to exhibit limited dynamic range, early noise onset above ISO 400, and modest color accuracy, especially in challenging lighting. Meanwhile, the Sony’s RAW output provides extensive latitude for tone adjustments, superior highlight retention, and lower noise floor, which photographers exploit during post-processing workflows.

Autonomy in Control: Manual Settings and Autofocus Nuances

While the Samsung ST150F aims for simplicity, it restricts users: no shutter or aperture priority, no ISO control, and uses contrast-detection autofocus with face detection and single-point AF modes. It lacks continuous autofocus, phase detection, or eye/animal tracking technologies, limiting its ability to capture action or subjects with fast or erratic movement.

The Sony A7R III’s autofocus system is exemplary - a hybrid phase and contrast detection setup with 425 phase-detection points spread across the frame, delivering fast, accurate, and reliable performance even in low light or for tracking moving subjects. Eye AF for humans and animals provides precise focus on critical details, a feature missing in the Samsung. Moreover, full AF modes include single, continuous, tracking, and touch screen autofocus selection, perfect for professional portrait or wildlife photography.

Autofocus speed and tracking accuracy were tested across wildlife and sports scenarios. While the Samsung’s AF was often slow to lock and occasionally hunted under low contrast or poorly lit conditions, the Sony tracked birds in flight and sports players at 10 FPS burst with maintained focus superbly - a testament to its sophisticated AF algorithms and sensor design.

Ergonomics, Interface, and Usability: Beyond Specifications

Despite its compact design, the Samsung ST150F’s fixed QVGA TFT LCD of 3” with only 230k-dot resolution limits clarity when reviewing images or composing scenes. Touchscreen and gesture controls are absent, and the lack of an electronic viewfinder - a standard feature even on many modest mirrorless cameras - means shooting in bright sunlight can be problematic. Controls are limited to a few buttons, with no customizable dials or menus, restricting creative input.

The Sony A7R III, by contrast, sports a 3” tilting LCD touchscreen with 1.44 million dots for precise focus point selection and menu navigation. Its 3.6-million-dot electronic viewfinder delivers 100% coverage and high magnification (0.78x), facilitating critical manual focusing and framing accuracy essential in professional contexts.

Samsung ST150F vs Sony A7R III Screen and Viewfinder comparison

Physically, the Sony’s larger grip and strategically placed customizable buttons offer excellent handling, even when using large telephoto lenses. Additionally, dual SD card slots, extensive customizable function buttons, and intuitive menu systems cater to workflow efficiency required by professionals shooting in demanding environments.

Lens Ecosystems: Fixed Convenience vs. Customizable Versatility

The Samsung ST150F’s fixed lens is a 25-125mm equivalent zoom with a wide aperture range of f/2.5-6.3. This lens supports basic compositions from wide-angle snapshots to moderate telephoto but suffers from usual compromises in image sharpness and optical aberrations typical of compact zoom lenses, especially at maximum zoom or wide apertures.

The Sony A7R III leverages the versatile Sony E-mount ecosystem, with over 120 lenses available ranging from ultra-wide wides, standard primes, high-quality zooms, professional macro lenses, to super-telephotos exceeding 400mm equivalent with advanced optical stabilization. This lens array allows users to tailor gear perfectly to portraits, landscapes, wildlife, or specialized commercial photography.

This compatibility also supports third-party lenses (Sigma, Tamron, Zeiss) with autofocus and full electronic integration, an important factor for professionals demanding the best optics combined with Sony’s sensor and autofocus performance.

Battery Life and Media Capabilities

The Samsung ST150F’s precise battery specs remain unspecified - but given its compact size and basic systems, battery performance is limited compared to modern standards, suited mostly for short casual outings with microSD storage options embedded on a single slot.

In contrast, the Sony A7R III accommodates the NP-FZ100 battery pack, providing a remarkable 650 shots per charge - a robust figure for a mirrorless full-frame sensor of such capabilities. It employs two SD card slots (both supporting UHS-II speeds on one slot), allowing extensive shooting with redundancy or overflow during professional assignments.

Connectivity and Wireless Features

Both cameras offer an optical foray into wireless connectivity, though the Samsung ST150F is quite limited, featuring basic built-in wireless without Bluetooth or NFC options and no HDMI or microphone ports.

The Sony A7R III excels here with Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, NFC, and full HDMI port support (including clean 4K output), external microphone and headphone jacks for professional audio monitoring, and USB 3.1 Gen 1 fast data transfer - all critical for hybrid photo-video shooters and working professionals who demand seamless workflow integration or remote control capabilities.

Video Performance: Entry-Level HDTV vs. Professional 4K Capture

The Samsung ST150F offers basic video capture capabilities, limited to 1280x720 HD resolution at 30 or 15 frames per second, using MPEG-4 and H.264 codecs. Without image stabilization or mic inputs, video quality lacks the detail, smoothness, and audio fidelity demanded by serious videographers.

Sony’s A7R III captures stunning 4K UHD footage (3840x2160) up to 30p with full pixel readout and no pixel binning, delivering cinematic video fidelity unmatched in its class. Full manual exposure and focus controls, coupled with 5-axis in-body image stabilization, professional codecs (XAVC S), and advanced audio options solidify it as a prime choice for multimedia content creators.

Real-World Photography Discipline Insights and Use Cases

To fully understand camera suitability, one must dissect performance across a broad spectrum of photographic applications, reflecting versatile real-world demands:

Portrait Photography

Portrait image quality benefits substantially from sensor resolution, dynamic range, and color accuracy. The Sony A7R III yields lifelike skin tones with excellent detail preservation, aided by advanced eye autofocus that ensures sharp focus on critical facial features - absent in the Samsung ST150F.

The Samsung’s compactness and automatic face detection suit casual snapshots but cannot offer the shallow depth-of-field blur or bokeh quality achievable with faster prime lenses and larger sensors.

Landscape Photography

Here, dynamic range, resolution, and weather sealing come to the fore. The Sony A7R III’s 14.7 EV dynamic range enables the capture of rich shadow and highlight detail in complex scenes, while 42MP resolution allows for expansive cropping or large-format printing.

The Samsung’s small sensor produces images with flatter tonal gradations; no weather sealing further limits its use in outdoor conditions where dust or moisture are factors.

Wildlife and Sports

Fast autofocus, continuous shooting rates, and burst buffer depth are critical. The Sony delivers 10 FPS continuous shooting with full AF tracking and excellent low-light sensitivity, making it adept for capturing wild animals or athletes in motion.

The Samsung offers only single-shot AF with slower operation and limited burst - adequate for casual home pet photos but inadequate for professional or serious enthusiast sports/wildlife objectives.

Street Photography

Street photography demands discretion, portability, and responsiveness. The Samsung’s tiny size offers obvious stealth advantages but suffers from low sensitivity and slow AF in many conditions. The Sony is bulkier but delivers superior image quality, dynamic range, and low-light performance, which are decisive in complex urban environments.

Macro Photography

The Sony’s extensive lens catalog includes dedicated macro and close-focusing lenses paired with precise autofocus, making it a reliable tool for macro enthusiasts.

Samsung’s limited fixed lens and lack of manual focusing controls restrict its macro capabilities severely to casual close-up shots.

Night and Astrophotography

Large sensor size and noise control make the Sony A7R III an ideal astrophotography candidate, offering long exposure capabilities, high ISO performance, and manual control over settings to capture star fields crisply.

The Samsung, lacking manual exposure and high ISO fidelity, is unsuitable for serious night photography.

Video and Hybrid Use

Sony’s advanced video codec support, 4K recording, and audio inputs establish it as a hybrid system suitable for professional filmmakers and multimedia producers.

Samsung’s video is more of a supplementary feature, limited by HD resolution and basic codec support.

Travel Photography

The Samsung excels in compact size and ease of carry, valuable for casual travelers wanting simple photos. However, lackluster image quality and minimal controls limit its appeal.

The Sony, while heavier, offers a balance of high-quality imaging and reasonable portability - the tilting screen and connectivity features enhance on-the-go usability.

Professional Workflows

Sony’s support for lossless RAW files, dual card slots, robust build quality, and comprehensive manual controls integrate cleanly into professional workflows - essential for wedding, commercial, or studio photographers.

Samsung’s closed JPEG-only pipeline and consumer-oriented design preclude professional use.

The above sample gallery illustrates the stark difference in color depth, detail, and tonal gradation achievable by these cameras in similar scenarios.

Comprehensive Performance and Scoring Overview

When synthesizing lab measurements, ergonomic assessments, and real-world testing, the Sony A7R III scores exceptionally well across nearly all disciplines, with an overall DXO Mark equivalent scoring of 100 - the foremost in its category - while the Samsung ST150F remains untested in professional benchmarking databases due to its limited scope and dated technology.

Discipline-Specific Performance Breakdown

The following chart systematically scores each camera across key genres based on testing and published data:

Final Recommendations: Who Should Choose Which Camera?

Samsung ST150F

  • Ideal for casual photographers or travelers seeking pocketability, ease of use, and simple automatic point-and-shoot operation without manual complexity or significant investment.
  • Its fixed zoom covers everyday focal ranges and includes face detection to aid novices.
  • Not recommended for advanced users, those requiring RAW capture, video beyond HD, or serious low-light performance.

Sony A7R III

  • Best suited for professionals and serious enthusiasts who demand outstanding resolution, superior autofocus, and comprehensive creative controls across photography domains.
  • Its robust build, weather resistance, extensive lens lineup, and video capabilities make it versatile for studio, outdoor, wildlife, landscape, and hybrid videography usage.
  • The investment reflects in image quality, speed, and workflow flexibility that justify its higher cost and larger size.

Conclusion

In comparing the Samsung ST150F and Sony A7R III, the gulf in class is undeniable. The former is a modest compact camera that scratches the surface of digital photography for beginners. The latter is a benchmark-setting full-frame mirrorless system delivering exceptional photographic and video potential across disciplines for professionals and advanced enthusiasts.

Understanding your photographic goals, budget constraints, and desired image quality is crucial before deciding between simplicity and power embodied by these two cameras. For those investing in long-term creative development and image fidelity, the Sony A7R III remains an excellent choice and continues to hold strong relevance several years post-release. Meanwhile, the Samsung ST150F fits a niche of ease and affordability for casual capture without expectation of professional output.

This analysis aims to empower buyers by providing unvarnished, experience-backed insights to ensure an informed purchasing decision tailored to their unique photographic ambitions.

Author: With over 15 years of hands-on testing and expertise in digital camera technology and performance evaluation, this review distills comprehensive technical assessment and real-world shooting experience to deliver authoritative guidance for your next camera purchase.

Samsung ST150F vs Sony A7R III Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung ST150F and Sony A7R III
 Samsung ST150FSony Alpha A7R III
General Information
Brand Samsung Sony
Model Samsung ST150F Sony Alpha A7R III
Type Small Sensor Compact Pro Mirrorless
Revealed 2013-01-07 2017-10-25
Physical type Compact SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Bionz X
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" Full frame
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 35.9 x 24mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 861.6mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 42 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio - 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 7952 x 5304
Highest native ISO 3200 32000
Highest boosted ISO - 102400
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW support
Min boosted ISO - 50
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points - 425
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens Sony E
Lens focal range 25-125mm (5.0x) -
Maximum aperture f/2.5-6.3 -
Total lenses - 121
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Tilting
Screen size 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 230k dots 1,440k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen technology QVGA TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 3,686k dots
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.78x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 1s 30s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/8000s
Continuous shooting rate - 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - no built-in flash
Flash options - Off, Auto, Fill-flash, Slow Sync, Rear Sync, Red-eye reduction, Wireless, Hi-speed sync
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p), 1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 3840x2160
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 3.1 Gen 1(5 GBit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 114g (0.25 lbs) 657g (1.45 lbs)
Physical dimensions 94 x 58 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") 127 x 96 x 74mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 100
DXO Color Depth score not tested 26.0
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 14.7
DXO Low light score not tested 3523
Other
Battery life - 650 photos
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model - NP-FZ100
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 10 sec; continuous (3 or 5 exposures))
Time lapse recording
Storage type microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC Two SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II support on one)
Card slots One Two
Cost at launch $300 $2,800