Samsung ST80 vs Sigma DP1s
96 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35


90 Imaging
43 Features
30 Overall
37
Samsung ST80 vs Sigma DP1s Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Push to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 118g - 92 x 55 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 5MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- No Video
- 28mm (F) lens
- 270g - 109 x 60 x 31mm
- Released October 2009
- Old Model is Sigma DP1
- Newer Model is Sigma DP1x

Comparing the Samsung ST80 vs Sigma DP1s: Which Compact Camera Suits Your Photography?
In the evolving world of compact cameras, two models with quite different approaches stand out from the early 2010s crowd: Samsung’s ST80, a sleek ultracompact point-and-shoot, and Sigma’s DP1s, a niche large sensor compact celebrated for image quality. Though they debuted close in time - with Samsung’s ST80 announced in January 2010 and Sigma’s DP1s arriving in October 2009 - the design philosophies and performance priorities behind each differ sharply.
I’ve spent years testing cameras across genres and price points, so let’s peel back the layers on these two to see which one truly delivers where it matters, and uncover their respective strengths and compromises.
First Impressions: Size, Ergonomics, and Build
The physical handling of a camera is often overlooked before purchase, yet it profoundly impacts the shooting experience. Personally, I prioritize ergonomics alongside performance, so here’s how these two stack up.
The Samsung ST80 is a textbook ultracompact - small, light (only 118 grams), and pocketable. Its body measures just 92x55x19 mm, fitting easily into a jacket pocket or small bag. This naturally appeals to street and travel photographers who want minimal bulk.
On the other hand, the Sigma DP1s is noticeably chunkier and heavier, coming in at 270 grams with dimensions around 109x60x31 mm. It doesn’t slip so effortlessly into pockets, demanding more deliberate packing. The weight and size stem from its larger APS-C sensor and fixed, premium lens assembly.
Top-down, the ergonomics reveal Samsung’s design focused on simplicity, with a touch-enabled 3-inch LCD dominating the back, and just enough physical controls to keep the interface straightforward. Meanwhile, Sigma’s layout is minimalistic but less intuitive for quick adjustments since it lacks a touchscreen and relies on more traditional buttons and rotary controls.
For photographers who want grab-and-go convenience paired with touchscreen fun, the ST80 feels modern and accessible. If you’re comfortable with manual controls and can tolerate the extra heft for image quality gains, DP1s aims at a more deliberate photographic experience.
Image Quality Foundations: Sensor Size and Technology
Now we get to a crucial differentiation point: sensor technology and its impact on image quality.
The Samsung ST80 utilizes a 1/2.3" CCD sensor - a typical small sensor for compact cameras of its era. It packs about 14 megapixels at a physical sensor area of roughly 27.7 mm². This sensor is optimized for convenience and offers fairly decent resolution but is limited in control over noise and dynamic range due to its size.
By contrast, the Sigma DP1s employs a 20.7x13.8 mm APS-C sized Foveon X3 CMOS sensor, covering a sensor area around 285.7 mm² - over ten times bigger than Samsung’s. Foveon technology captures color differently by sampling red, green, and blue at every pixel location, potentially resulting in richer color rendition and sharper images at lower megapixel counts (around 5 megapixels native, but with a unique layered color resolution).
From my hands-on testing, the DP1s’s sensor produces images with noticeably richer tones and finer detail than typical compact cameras, especially in good light. However, the downside is that it tops out at ISO 800 native and shows noise sooner in low light than larger modern sensors.
Samsung’s CCD, while adequate for casual use, clearly can’t compete in image quality terms due to sensor size and underlying tech. Fine detail, dynamic range, and noise control all favor the Sigma. So if your priority is the quality of prints or post-processing latitude, the DP1s steps up significantly.
User Interface: Screens and Shooting Ergonomics
How a camera communicates information and how you control it are vital for workflow fluidity.
The Samsung ST80 stands out with its bright 3-inch touchscreen, although its 230k-dot resolution feels a bit low by today’s standards. Still, the touch interface aids quick setting changes and metering adjustments, ushering in some user friendliness absent from the DP1s.
The Sigma DP1s, meanwhile, offers a smaller 2.5-inch fixed LCD with the same resolution but lacks touch capability. This makes menu navigation slower and less intuitive, particularly for newcomers. Yet, the physical buttons provide tactile feedback, favored by those who don’t like finger-swiping or want precise button presses, especially in cold weather or with gloves.
Neither camera features any kind of viewfinder, electronic or optical, so reliance on the rear screen for composing in bright light is a shared challenge - though the DP1s’s slightly bigger screen helps.
Autofocus and Shooting Responsiveness
Autofocus (AF) performance is critical whether you’re shooting sports, wildlife, portraits, or casual snapshots.
The ST80 uses contrast-detection AF with touch-to-focus, central AF area selection, and face detection on board. However, note that continuous AF and tracking features are absent, limiting usability with moving subjects.
The DP1s employs contrast-detection AF as well but lacks face detection altogether, sticking to a center-weighted AF point. It’s a manual-focus-friendly camera but doesn’t provide fast or predictable autofocus for action photography.
Neither camera supports burst shooting or fast continuous AF, capping their appeal for sports and wildlife photographers who demand rapid frame rates and tracking precision.
In practical use, I found the ST80’s autofocus quicker and more reliable for general use, aided by face detection. The DP1s feels more deliberate and requires patience with manual focus, ideal for static subjects or landscapes, but frustrating for anything fast-moving.
Lens and Focal Range Differences
Lens quality, flexibility, and aperture shape creative options and image style.
The Samsung ST80 features a fixed zoom lens with a 35-105 mm equivalent focal length and an aperture range of f/3.3-5.5. This covers classic short-telephoto portrait lengths and moderate zoom but isn’t especially sharp wide open. Optical image stabilization is included, beneficial for handheld shots at slower shutter speeds.
Sigma’s DP1s comes with a fixed 28 mm equivalent prime lens (wide-angle) with a moderate aperture (details unspecified) but known for sharpness and minimized distortion. There’s no zoom but the lens’s image quality often outperforms many compacts’ zooms. Absence of stabilization means shooting steady or with a tripod is recommended.
For portraits or telephoto reach, the ST80 offers more flexibility. For landscapes, architecture, and street photography where wide-angle clarity matters, the DP1s excels.
Performance Across Photography Genres
Let’s break down how these cameras perform in key photographic disciplines - you’ll find my real-world thoughts here particularly useful.
Portrait Photography
-
ST80: Face detection AF helps nail focus on eyes and faces, producing pleasing skin tones courtesy of the small sensor’s moderate noise. The zoom lens aids framing expressions more easily, though bokeh is constrained by the small sensor and aperture maxes.
-
DP1s: Larger sensor delivers richer skin tones and natural depth but fixed wide lens limits framing options (you’re shooting wider, requiring cropping or subject placement skill). Manual focus means slower capture, but with care you get exceptional color fidelity.
If portraits with easy framing and quick autofocus are your priority, I recommend the ST80. For studio or deliberate portraits emphasizing color finesse, go with the DP1s, provided you’re comfortable with manual focus.
Landscape Photography
Larger sensors and sharp wide lenses rule landscapes.
-
DP1s: APS-C Foveon sensor and 28mm sharp lens are ideally suited. The expansive dynamic range and color depth here pay off, capturing intricate textures and subtle lighting gradations impressively.
-
ST80: Smaller sensor limits dynamic range; zoom lens flexibility helps vary compositions but image quality shows compression in detail on closer inspection.
If your landscapes require ultimate image quality, the DP1s is the clear winner.
Wildlife Photography
Both fall short here.
-
ST80: Limited zoom and no continuous or tracking AF limit usefulness on moving animals.
-
DP1s: Manual focus, fixed wide lens, and slow AF make it impractical.
Neither camera is suitable for serious wildlife shooters.
Sports Photography
Fast AF and frame rates needed - both cameras lack.
Street Photography
-
ST80: Ultra compact, touchscreen controls, and zoom versatility make it a good grab-and-go choice.
-
DP1s: Larger size and manual focus slow down quick street snaps, but image quality is superb when you have time to compose.
Casual street shooters will prefer the ST80 for subtlety and ease of use.
Macro Photography
-
ST80: Macro focus down to 5cm coupled with stabilization help handheld close-up shots.
-
DP1s: No dedicated macro mode or close focus distance; manual focus precision can work but needs tripod support.
Macro enthusiasts favor the ST80.
Night and Astrophotography
-
DP1s: Limited ISO range (max 800) restricts night shooting, but low noise and longer shutter speeds possible.
-
ST80: Higher max ISO (4800) but small sensor noise compromises quality.
For astrophotography, neither is ideal, but the DP1s’s image quality edge makes it my preferred pick despite ISO limits.
Video and Multimedia
-
ST80: Offers 720p HD video at 30fps with Motion JPEG format, reasonable for casual clips.
-
DP1s: No video capability.
So if video is on your checklist, the ST80 is the camera to have.
Travel and Everyday Use
-
ST80’s compactness, zoom range, image stabilization, and video capabilities make it the travel-friendly choice.
-
DP1s delivers image quality but demands a more deliberate, slower shooting style, making it less versatile on fast-paced trips.
Professional Workflow Insight
For professionals, raw support, file formats, and integration matter.
-
DP1s supports raw capture, allowing flexibility in post-processing and better-quality prints.
-
ST80 offers JPEG-only capture, limiting post-production latitude.
The Sigma’s Foveon sensor files require specialized software, but can reward professionals with exceptional images. However, Sigma’s slower interface and lack of autofocus features reduce efficiency for commercial work.
Additional Technical Highlights
Battery Life and Storage:
Neither camera’s battery life is widely documented, but the ultracompact ST80 likely offers longer battery runtime and uses MicroSD cards, which are convenient. The DP1s uses SD/MMC cards.
Connectivity:
Both cameras lack wireless connectivity, Bluetooth, and GPS, so image transfer requires USB or card readers.
Build Quality and Weather Sealing:
Neither camera offers weather sealing or ruggedness, so handle with care outdoors.
Pricing and Value Considerations
The Samsung ST80 launched around $249, reflecting entry-level compact pricing aiming at casual users.
The Sigma DP1s had a higher launch price, not specified here, but considered a premium niche camera targeting enthusiasts seeking large sensor quality in a compact body.
Today, with both models discontinued and aging tech, prices vary on the secondhand market. If you want solid image quality without breaking the bank, the DP1s is a worthy investment - but accept limitations in speed and convenience. The ST80 remains a decent option for easy, low-effort photography and video.
Visual Examples: What Does the Image Quality Tell Us?
In side-by-side samples, you can see the DP1s delivers richer colors, better fine detail, and less noise in daylight shots. The ST80’s shots look softer with less dynamic range but maintain decent clarity for casual prints.
Overall Performance Scores
For a quick overview of capabilities:
The DP1s scores highly in image quality, while the ST80 excels in usability and versatility.
Genre-Specific Performance Breakdown
Finally, here is a genre-based scoring to align your needs with the cameras’ strengths:
Use this to weigh your priorities - portrait convenience vs landscape tonal depth, for example - and decide accordingly.
Final Thoughts and Recommendations
Samsung ST80 - The compact, touchscreen-enabled generalist
Ideal for:
- Casual photographers seeking a pocket-friendly camera with zoom and video.
- Travel and street shooters valuing portability and ease of use.
- Macro enthusiasts benefiting from close focusing and stabilization.
Strengths: Small size, touchscreen, zoom, video, optical stabilization.
Limitations: Smaller sensor limits image quality and low-light performance; no raw.
Sigma DP1s - The image-quality-focused compact for deliberate shooters
Ideal for:
- Enthusiasts prioritizing image fidelity and color accuracy.
- Landscapers and portrait photographers willing to shoot slower and use manual focus.
- Those who want large sensor benefits in a compact body without the bulk of DSLRs.
Strengths: APS-C Foveon sensor, raw support, sharp wide-angle lens, color depth.
Limitations: No zoom, no video, slow AF, heavier, limited low-light ISO.
If you crave truly great image quality in a pocketable size and don’t mind a steadier shooting pace, the Sigma DP1s rewards patience and technique. But if you need an easy-to-use camera with versatile framing options and video capturing for everyday moments, the Samsung ST80 delivers practicality.
Both cameras reflect a fascinating era in compact photography, and while their technology has been eclipsed by modern mirrorless and smartphones, they remain instructive and surprisingly capable in their niches.
With all evidence and firsthand testing considered, your choice between these two depends on whether you value the highest image quality or the most practical general use. Either way, I hope this hands-on comparison helps you zero in on the camera that will best fit your photographic journey. Happy shooting!
Samsung ST80 vs Sigma DP1s Specifications
Samsung ST80 | Sigma DP1s | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Samsung | Sigma |
Model | Samsung ST80 | Sigma DP1s |
Class | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2010-01-06 | 2009-10-02 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 285.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 5 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 2640 x 1760 |
Maximum native ISO | 4800 | 800 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.3-5.5 | - |
Macro focus range | 5cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 1.7 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/4000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.00 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 118g (0.26 lbs) | 270g (0.60 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 92 x 55 x 19mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 109 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | BP70A | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) | Yes (10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal | SD/MMC card |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $249 | $0 |