Samsung ST90 vs Sony RX100 VI
99 Imaging
37 Features
19 Overall
29
88 Imaging
54 Features
75 Overall
62
Samsung ST90 vs Sony RX100 VI Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Announced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-200mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 301g - 102 x 58 x 43mm
- Revealed June 2018
- Replaced the Sony RX100 V
- Refreshed by Sony RX100 VII
Samsung ST90 vs Sony RX100 VI Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Samsung ST90 vs Sony RX100 VI, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Samsung and Sony. There is a noticeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the ST90 (14MP) and RX100 VI (20MP) and the ST90 (1/2.3") and RX100 VI (1") offer different sensor size.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe ST90 was revealed 8 years before the RX100 VI which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Samsung ST90 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony RX100 VI being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting into a full comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the ST90 grades vs the RX100 VI when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung ST90 vs Sony RX100 VI Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung ST90 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VI. The full galleries are available at Samsung ST90 Gallery & Sony RX100 VI Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung ST90 over the Sony RX100 VI
ST90 | RX100 VI |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX100 VI over the Samsung ST90
RX100 VI | ST90 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | June 2018 | January 2011 | More modern by 89 months | |
Focus manually | Dial accurate focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 1229k | 460k | Clearer display (+769k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Samsung ST90 and Sony RX100 VI
ST90 | RX100 VI | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display size |
Samsung ST90 vs Sony RX100 VI Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Samsung ST90 has got outside measurements of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Sony RX100 VI has dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 43mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.7") along with a weight of 301 grams (0.66 lbs).
Take a look at the Samsung ST90 vs Sony RX100 VI in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Here is a front view scale comparison of the ST90 and the RX100 VI.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the ST90 and RX100 VI is 99 and 88 respectively.
Samsung ST90 vs Sony RX100 VI Sensor Comparison
Generally, its difficult to imagine the gap between sensor sizes purely by reviewing specifications. The pic here may give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the ST90 and RX100 VI.
To sum up, each of the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The ST90 using its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field more difficult and the Sony RX100 VI will offer you more detail because of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more aged ST90 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Samsung ST90 vs Sony RX100 VI Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung ST90 vs Sony RX100 VI Specifications
Samsung ST90 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VI | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Samsung | Sony |
Model type | Samsung ST90 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VI |
Class | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2011-01-19 | 2018-06-05 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.5mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | - | 12800 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | - | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Min boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 315 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | () | 24-200mm (8.3x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focusing range | - | 8cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 1,229 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.59x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Maximum silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 24.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 5.90 m (at Auto ISO) |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/2000s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | NP-BX1 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | - | 301 grams (0.66 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") | 102 x 58 x 43mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 240 shots |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | - | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | With downloadable app | |
Type of storage | - | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $150 | $1,198 |