Ricoh GR II vs Sigma DP2 Quattro
89 Imaging
59 Features
55 Overall
57
70 Imaging
63 Features
38 Overall
53
Ricoh GR II vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16.0) lens
- 251g - 117 x 63 x 35mm
- Released June 2015
- Succeeded the Ricoh GR
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- 45mm (F2.8) lens
- 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
- Introduced February 2014
Ricoh GR II vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview
Let's look closer at the Ricoh GR II versus Sigma DP2 Quattro, both Large Sensor Compact cameras by manufacturers Ricoh and Sigma. The resolution of the GR II (16MP) and the DP2 Quattro (20MP) is relatively comparable and they use the same exact sensor measurements (APS-C).
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe GR II was unveiled 17 months later than the DP2 Quattro which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Large Sensor Compact).
Before delving straight into a complete comparison, below is a concise view of how the GR II scores versus the DP2 Quattro with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh GR II vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GR II and Sigma DP2 Quattro. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR II Gallery and Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR II over the Sigma DP2 Quattro
GR II | DP2 Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | June 2015 | February 2014 | Fresher by 17 months | |
Screen resolution | 1230k | 920k | Sharper screen (+310k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Ricoh GR II
DP2 Quattro | GR II |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR II and Sigma DP2 Quattro
GR II | DP2 Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | No Touch screen |
Ricoh GR II vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera frequently, you're going to have to take into account its weight and size. The Ricoh GR II offers outside measurements of 117mm x 63mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 251 grams (0.55 lbs) while the Sigma DP2 Quattro has specifications of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") and a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh GR II versus Sigma DP2 Quattro in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are working with at the time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the GR II against the DP2 Quattro.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the GR II and DP2 Quattro is 89 and 70 respectively.
Ricoh GR II vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is hard to picture the difference in sensor sizing simply by going through specifications. The photograph here should give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the GR II and DP2 Quattro.
Plainly, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You should count on the Sigma DP2 Quattro to produce greater detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures far more aggressively. The younger GR II provides an advantage in sensor tech.
Ricoh GR II vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR II vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications
Ricoh GR II | Sigma DP2 Quattro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Sigma |
Model type | Ricoh GR II | Sigma DP2 Quattro |
Type | Large Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Released | 2015-06-17 | 2014-02-13 |
Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | GR Engine V | TRUE III engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 23.7 x 15.7mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 372.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 5424 x 3616 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 45mm (1x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-16.0 | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing distance | 10cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 300s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 4.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m (at Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 251 gr (0.55 pounds) | 395 gr (0.87 pounds) |
Dimensions | 117 x 63 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1078 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 images | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | DB-65 | BP-51 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $599 | $931 |