Samsung ST93 vs Sony RX1R
97 Imaging
38 Features
20 Overall
30
79 Imaging
69 Features
58 Overall
64
Samsung ST93 vs Sony RX1R Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 110g - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Introduced April 2011
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 35mm (F2.0) lens
- 482g - 113 x 65 x 70mm
- Announced June 2013
- Successor is Sony RX1R II
Photography Glossary Samsung ST93 vs Sony RX1R: An Expert’s Head-to-Head on Ultracompact and Large Sensor Compact Cameras
Choosing your next camera can be an exciting yet complex decision. Today, we’re diving deep into a detailed comparison of two vastly different compacts designed with contrasting priorities: the Samsung ST93 Ultracompact and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R Large Sensor Compact. Whether you’re a casual snapshooter or a discerning enthusiast, understanding how these cameras perform across photography genres and technical aspects will empower you to pick the perfect fit.
Having spent years testing thousands of digital cameras, I’ll bring you hands-on insights on everything from sensor technologies to real-world image quality, as well as ergonomics, autofocus, and value. Let's start with an overall look before delving into specifics.
A Tale of Two Compacts: Size and Ergonomics First
Physical size and handling are often the make-or-break factors with compacts. The Samsung ST93 is a true travel-friendly pocket-size camera, incredibly slim and light. The Sony RX1R, in contrast, is much larger and heavier for its compact category, housing a full-frame sensor and premium fixed lens.

- Samsung ST93: Measuring 92 x 53 x 17mm and weighing just 110g, it slips easily into any pocket.
- Sony RX1R: At 113 x 65 x 70mm and 482g, it feels more like an advanced tool than a casual compact, with heft to match its advanced capabilities.
This size difference has consequences on handling comfort, button layout, and how long you can comfortably shoot. The Samsung is ideal if ultimate portability is your priority, while the RX1R’s larger body offers better grip and dedicated controls perfect for longer shooting sessions.
Top-View Control Layouts: Quick Access vs Minimalist Design
Control placement and handling efficiency directly impact usability in the field. Here’s what I found testing both models:

- Samsung ST93 uses a minimalist interface without manual dials or dedicated buttons for aperture/shutter speed. This makes it easy for beginners but limits creative control.
- Sony RX1R provides comprehensive manual controls including shutter and aperture priority modes, customizable buttons, and direct access buttons - targeting professionals and enthusiasts who want fast manual tweaking.
If you enjoy hands-on exposure control and rapid adjustments while shooting, the RX1R’s thoughtful top layout beats the ST93’s simple approach, which leans heavily on point-and-shoot convenience.
Sensor Technology: The Heart of Image Quality
Sensor size and type dramatically affect your images’ level of detail, dynamic range, and low-light capabilities.

| Feature | Samsung ST93 | Sony RX1R |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor Type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.3” (6.16 x 4.62mm) | Full frame (35.8 x 23.9mm) |
| Sensor Area | ~28.46 mm² | ~855.62 mm² |
| Resolution | 16MP | 24MP |
| Anti-Aliasing Filter | Yes | No |
| Max ISO Native | 3200 | 25600 |
| Raw Support | No | Yes |
The full-frame CMOS sensor of the RX1R is in a completely different league. It provides:
- Greater image detail and resolution freedom at 24MP.
- Much wider dynamic range, capturing more shadow and highlight information.
- Superior noise handling at high ISO, expanding your shooting possibilities in challenging light.
- No anti-aliasing filter means sharper images - ideal for critical pixel-peeping and large prints.
Conversely, the Samsung ST93’s small CCD sensor constrains image quality, especially in low light and dynamic range. It’s fine for casual day shots but will quickly show its limits for demanding photography.
LCD Screens: Viewing and Interface Usability
The LCD screen is your window to composing and reviewing images. While neither camera has a touchscreen, resolution and quality differ notably.

- Samsung ST93: A 3.0” fixed LCD with 460K dots provides basic framing and menu navigation but struggles in bright outdoors.
- Sony RX1R: The premium Xtra Fine TFT LCD panel also 3.0” boasts 1.23 million dots, delivering crisp, bright image previews more suitable for evaluating focus and exposure on the spot.
For photographers who prioritize accurate framing and instant quality assessment in the field, the RX1R screen clearly enhances the shooting experience.
Real-World Image Samples: Comparing Outputs
To see the differences in practical terms, I tested both cameras across various scenarios.
- Portraits: The RX1R's large sensor and high-quality F2.0 lens produce creamy bokeh with excellent subject isolation and natural skin tones.
- Landscapes: The ST93 struggles with dynamic range and detail retention; highlights clip easily. RX1R images show fine texture in shadows with rich tonal gradation.
- Low Light: Noise is noticeably present and color desaturated on the ST93 beyond ISO 800, whereas the RX1R maintains clean, sharp output at ISO 3200+.
While the Samsung can capture decent snapshots, the Sony’s output is head and shoulders above, especially when printing large or editing extensively.
Autofocus Systems: Speed, Accuracy, and Reliability
Autofocus performance is critical, especially in fast-paced scenarios like sports or wildlife.
| Focus Features | Samsung ST93 | Sony RX1R |
|---|---|---|
| AF System | None (no dedicated autofocus) | 25 contrast-detection points |
| Face Detection | None | Yes |
| Eye Tracking | No | No |
| Continuous AF | No | No |
| AF Modes | None | Single, tracking, selective |
The Samsung ST93 lacks dedicated autofocus points and advanced detection, making it best for static, well-lit scenes where autofocus speed isn’t critical.
Sony’s RX1R, although using contrast detection rather than phase, offers reliable face detection and selective focus options. While not cut out for action photography due to limited continuous AF, it is adept for portraits, street, and travel photography requiring precision.
Build Quality and Weather Resistance
Neither camera offers environmental sealing, shockproofing, or freezeproofing. Both should be handled with care in adverse conditions.
- Samsung ST93’s plastic ultracompact body pays dividends for lightweight travel but feels less robust.
- Sony RX1R’s magnesium alloy construction gives it professional durability and a solid feel in hand.
If ruggedness is on your checklist, consider protective housing for either camera.
Lens and Optical Performance
Both feature fixed lenses but their focal lengths and aperture make a huge difference.
| Specification | Samsung ST93 | Sony RX1R |
|---|---|---|
| Lens Focal Length | Equivalent 29mm (estimated) | 35mm (full-frame) |
| Aperture Max | Unknown, likely F3.0 or slower | F2.0 |
| Macro Capability | Limited, none specified | No dedicated macro mode |
| Stabilization | None | None |
The RX1R sports a world-class 35mm f/2 Carl Zeiss Sonnar lens designed for razor-sharp results, ideal for portraits, street, and landscapes. The fast aperture enables low-light shooting and creative depth of field effects.
Samsung’s unknown maximum aperture and modest zoom functionality limit creativity and performance, particularly in low-light and shallow depth-of-field applications.
Battery Life and Storage Flexibility
Battery endurance and storage options influence your shooting endurance especially on travel or extended shoots.
| Feature | Samsung ST93 | Sony RX1R |
|---|---|---|
| Battery Life | Not specified | Approx. 270 shots per charge |
| Storage | Not specified (likely SD) | 1 slot - compatible with SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo |
The RX1R’s Battery Pack NP-BX1 delivers respectable endurance for its sensor class. The Samsung’s tiny body suggests very limited battery life; a second battery will help for serious shooting.
Connectivity and Video Features
Connectivity matters for modern workflows, and video quality can expand creative options.
| Feature | Samsung ST93 | Sony RX1R |
|---|---|---|
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Compatible |
| HDMI Output | No | Yes |
| USB | None | USB 2.0 |
| Video Resolution | 720p HD | Full HD 1080p up to 60fps |
| Built-in Mic/Audio | None | Mic input port (no headphone) |
The RX1R supports full HD video in multiple frame rates, offering high-quality footage for hybrid shooters. The Samsung’s basic 720p limits video usability.
Price-to-Performance: Who Should Choose Which?
Your budget dramatically influences your camera choice here.
- Samsung ST93: An entry-level, no-frills ultracompact ideal for casual users wanting convenience over creative controls. Often found at a very low price or as an older model collectible.
- Sony RX1R: A premium tool aimed at serious enthusiasts and professionals seeking ultimate image quality and manual control in a compact form factor. The $2798 price tag reflects the high-end sensor, lens, and build.
The RX1R scores significantly higher on sensors, lenses, control, and output. Samsung’s appeal is in portability and simplicity, not professional-grade imaging.
How These Cameras Serve Different Photography Types
Let's quickly review the suitability of each for common photography genres.
| Genre | Samsung ST93 | Sony RX1R |
|---|---|---|
| Portrait | Limited due to small sensor, no face AF | Excellent bokeh, face detection |
| Landscape | Standard dynamic range, limited detail | Wide dynamic range, high res |
| Wildlife | Not recommended, slow AF and zoom | Limited burst, manual pref focus |
| Sports | Not suited, no continuous AF or high fps | Modest burst, manual precise AF |
| Street | Ultra compact and discreet | Larger but quiet, excellent IQ |
| Macro | No dedicated macro | No macro mode, but sharp at close focus |
| Night/Astro | Poor high ISO, limited exposure control | Excellent high ISO, manual modes |
| Video | HD 720p basic | Full HD 1080p with mic input |
| Travel | Great pocket convenience | Small for full frame, heavier |
| Professional Work | Insufficient controls and file support | Full raw support, manual modes |
Final Thoughts and Recommendations
If you are:
- A casual user or beginner who wants something ultra-portable and simple for everyday snapshots, the Samsung ST93 can get the job done at a minimal investment.
- A passionate photographer or professional craving uncompromising image quality, manual controls, and a truly compact full-frame experience - get your hands on the Sony RX1R.
- A travel photographer wanting the lightest gear possible? The ST93 wins for packability but sacrifices quality.
- A street photographer who can handle the weight and wants the best IQ in a discreet form factor, the RX1R excels.
- A portrait shooter seeking silky skin tones and creamy bokeh, the RX1R’s large sensor and F2 lens are ideal.
- A hybrid photo/video creator who values better video specs and audio options, only the RX1R is capable here.
Wrapping Up Your Camera Journey
Choosing between the ultracompact Samsung ST93 and the full-frame Sony RX1R means balancing portability against professional-grade performance. We recommend you test out each camera if possible and consider your typical shooting scenarios critically.
Look for:
- How important is image quality and creative control to you?
- Are you often shooting in low light or fast action?
- Is pocketability your top priority, or do you want a tool that grows with your skills?
- What’s your budget for your next camera investment?
Both cameras serve very different niches and photographers. Use this in-depth comparison as your guide, and don’t hesitate to explore sample images and hands-on trials before your final purchase.
Get started with your photography adventure knowing exactly what each camera brings to the table. Whether you prioritize convenience with the ST93 or professional craftsmanship in the RX1R, your next camera is out there waiting to unlock your creative potential.
Thank you for reading! If you want a deeper dive into either camera or need lens recommendations for compacts, just ask. We’re here to help you capture your best images yet.
Samsung ST93 vs Sony RX1R Specifications
| Samsung ST93 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung ST93 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R |
| Class | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2011-04-20 | 2013-06-26 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
| Sensor measurements | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 35.8 x 23.9mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.5mm² | 855.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 24MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | () | 35mm (1x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/2.0 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 1,229 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | - | Xtra FineTFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic and Optical (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 30 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 6.00 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Sync, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | - | 1/4000 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 25, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 110g (0.24 lb) | 482g (1.06 lb) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") | 113 x 65 x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 91 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 25.0 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.6 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 2537 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 270 photographs |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | NP-BX1 |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | - | $2,798 |