Samsung TL210 vs Samsung WB850F
94 Imaging
35 Features
27 Overall
31
91 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Samsung TL210 vs Samsung WB850F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-135mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 177g - 99 x 59 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2010
- Also referred to as PL150
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 250g - 109 x 62 x 25mm
- Released January 2012
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Samsung TL210 vs Samsung WB850F Overview
The following is a detailed comparison of the Samsung TL210 versus Samsung WB850F, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both produced by Samsung. There exists a big gap among the resolutions of the TL210 (12MP) and WB850F (16MP) but they possess the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe TL210 was released 24 months earlier than the WB850F which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Samsung TL210 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB850F being a Compact camera.
Before going through a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick summary of how the TL210 grades versus the WB850F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Samsung TL210 vs Samsung WB850F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung TL210 and Samsung WB850F. The complete galleries are provided at Samsung TL210 Gallery and Samsung WB850F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung TL210 over the Samsung WB850F
| TL210 | WB850F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB850F over the Samsung TL210
| WB850F | TL210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2012 |  | January 2010 | Newer by 24 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 614k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung TL210 and Samsung WB850F
| TL210 | WB850F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lack of Touch screen |
Samsung TL210 vs Samsung WB850F Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to travel with your camera regularly, you will want to take into account its weight and proportions. The Samsung TL210 features exterior measurements of 99mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") with a weight of 177 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Samsung WB850F has measurements of 109mm x 62mm x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0") with a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
Check out the Samsung TL210 versus Samsung WB850F in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you choose at that moment. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the TL210 compared to the WB850F.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TL210 and WB850F is 94 and 91 respectively.
Samsung TL210 vs Samsung WB850F Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's difficult to picture the gap in sensor dimensions purely by seeing specifications. The image underneath might offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the TL210 and WB850F.
To sum up, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different resolution. You should count on the Samsung WB850F to show extra detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more aged TL210 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Samsung TL210 vs Samsung WB850F Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Samsung TL210 vs Samsung WB850F Specifications
| Samsung TL210 | Samsung WB850F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Samsung | Samsung |
| Model | Samsung TL210 | Samsung WB850F |
| Also referred to as | PL150 | - |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2010-01-06 | 2012-01-09 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 27-135mm (5.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3.5" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | - | AMOLED display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.40 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 177 grams (0.39 pounds) | 250 grams (0.55 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 109 x 62 x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | SLB-07B | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $230 | $599 |
