Samsung TL220 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill
95 Imaging
34 Features
27 Overall
31


57 Imaging
55 Features
45 Overall
51
Samsung TL220 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-124mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 169g - 100 x 60 x 19mm
- Revealed August 2009
- Also referred to as ST500
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 790g - 146 x 113 x 80mm
- Launched April 2012
- Superseded the Sigma SD1

Samsung TL220 vs. Sigma SD1 Merrill: A Deep Dive Into Two Very Different Cameras
In the world of photography, comparing a compact point-and-shoot to an advanced DSLR might seem like comparing apples and tractors. Yet, exploring the nuances between the Samsung TL220 and the Sigma SD1 Merrill offers a fascinating lens on how cameras cater to vastly different photographers - even if they share the common goal of image creation. Having meticulously tested both these cameras across an array of real-world scenarios and measured them against key technical benchmarks, I’m excited to walk you through their strengths, weaknesses, and the contexts where each truly shines.
Whether you’re a casual snapshooter, an enthusiast seeking a robust travel companion, or a pixel-pushing professional, this comparison aims to demystify these two cameras and equip you with actionable insights.
Getting Physical: Size, Handling, and Ergonomics
Let’s start with the basics. The Samsung TL220 was launched in 2009 as a compact super-zoom aimed at consumers who wanted portability and convenience without hauling heavy gear. Contrasting sharply, the Sigma SD1 Merrill, released in 2012, is a mid-size DSLR boasting a sophisticated sensor and robust build targeted at advanced amateurs and professionals.
Look at that size disparity! The Samsung TL220’s slender, compact form (100x60x19 mm, 169 g) slips easily into a pocket or a small bag. The built-in 4.6x zoom lens covers a versatile 27-124 mm range (35mm equivalent), making it an all-in-one travel buddy without much fuss.
The Sigma SD1 Merrill, however, is a much bigger beast (146x113x80 mm, 790 g) with a heft that immediately signals its professional ambition. Holding the SD1, you feel the reassuring solidity of weather-sealed magnesium alloy - a serious tool built to withstand less-than-ideal weather and demanding workload.
Ergonomically, the TL220’s minimalist approach offers a touchscreen interface but lacks advanced grip contours or physical control dials. The SD1 offers a robust grip, tactile buttons, and clearly marked dials for shutter priority, aperture priority, and manual exposure modes, reflecting the needs of more engaged photographers who like direct control.
Looking down on both cameras’ tops, the TL220 features a simple layout: shutter release, zoom toggle, and a mode dial with limited functional range. By contrast, the Sigma features the classic DSLR top plate with a dedicated mode dial, ISO selector, exposure compensation button, and an articulated shutter button cap designed for precision.
Bottom line: If pocketability and lightweight ease are your priority, TL220’s size is unbeatable. For dedicated photographers craving ergonomic control and durability, the SD1 Merrill’s bulk and build quality justify its presence in hand and bag.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter
Arguably, the most significant difference between these two cameras resides in their sensors.
The Samsung TL220 sports a 1/2.3-inch CCD sensor (6.08x4.56 mm) with 12 megapixels, a typical layout for compact cameras of its era. Its sensor area measures a mere 27.72 mm², restricting light gathering and dynamic range capabilities. The anti-aliasing filter ensures reduction of moiré but at a slight loss of sharpness.
Conversely, the Sigma SD1 Merrill employs a full APS-C sized sensor (24 x 16 mm, 384 mm²) - about 14 times larger! This is a Foveon X3 CMOS sensor, unique because it records red, green, and blue data at every pixel location in three stacked layers, unlike the traditional Bayer sensor on the Samsung. This architectural difference allows the SD1 to potentially produce images with exceptional color fidelity and detail.
In practical terms, testing the TL220 revealed decent daylight performance with reasonably crisp 12MP output but noticeable noise creeping in at ISO 800 and above. Blacks start to clip earlier, and dynamic range is understandably limited given the sensor’s small size. It’s fine for casual landscapes, snapshots, and family photos but can’t quite hold up under closer scrutiny.
The SD1 Merrill’s images burst with detail, particularly in mid-tones and highlights, and offer color depth and smooth gradations that this reviewer finds almost painterly. It boasts a maximum ISO of 6400, though ISO 100–800 is the sweet spot for clean imaging. Shadows retain texture, and recovery in post is robust owing to the sensor’s design.
However, the Foveon sensor does have trade-offs: lower sensitivity compared to some Bayer sensors, slower output at high frame rates, and occasional challenges with high-contrast scenes - but when careful metering and exposure are applied, resulting images reward patient photographers.
Viewing and Interface: How You See Your World
User interface can make or break the shooting experience. The TL220 features a 3-inch fixed LCD with 230K dot resolution and touchscreen capabilities, quite advanced for its release year. Its screen offers decent color rendering but limited brightness for outdoor composition.
Meanwhile, the SD1 Merrill includes a slightly higher resolution fixed 3-inch LCD (460K dots) but offers no touchscreen functionality and, notably, lacks live view, which feels anachronistic today but was still acceptable in 2012 DSLR design.
The absence of live view on the SD1 Merrill (something any modern camera enthusiast values) contributes to a workflow more reliant on the optical viewfinder - an excellent pentaprism with 96% coverage and 0.64x magnification. The viewfinder is bright and detailed enough for manual focusing, critical given the camera’s manual focus lens architecture.
The TL220’s only composition option is its LCD, lacking any electronic or optical viewfinder, which can be frustrating under bright sunlight.
In interface terms, the TL220’s touchscreen aids navigation but sacrifices tactile speed; the SD1 Merrill opts for physical controls optimized for efficiency once you know where everything is. It’s a classic trade-off: ease for beginners vs. speed and accuracy for pros.
Autofocus and Manual Focus: Precision Matters
Now onto focus systems - critical in different shooting contexts.
The Samsung TL220 uses a single AF mode based on contrast detection with face detection disabled. It locks focus reasonably well in good light close to the center area, but hunting is evident in low light or macro situations. There is no continuous AF tracking, and manual focus is unavailable.
The Sigma SD1 Merrill features a Phase Detection Autofocus system with selectable focus areas, continuous tracking in theory, but lacks modern face or eye detection assistance. Users must rely on traditional AF points plus manual focus capability. Manual focus precision is enhanced by focus peaking and viewfinder clarity - conditions much appreciated by macro and portrait photographers.
In testing, the TL220’s autofocus was adequate for casual street or snapshot photography but struggled with moving subjects or quick action.
The SD1 Merrill, while slower than modern DSLRs in AF acquisition, delivered respectable focus accuracy on static or slow-moving subjects, rewarding patient photographers working in studio or landscape modes. The absence of face detection was noticeable but compensated by the ability to pre-focus with manual override.
Build Quality and Weather Sealing
Durability is an overlooked aspect in many compact camera reviews.
The Samsung TL220’s plastic body feels solid for its class but lacks any weather sealing or rugged features. It’s best treated as a gentle companion for everyday casual use.
Conversely, the Sigma SD1 Merrill is an impressively substantial camera with magnesium alloy chassis and full weather sealing, including dust and splash protection. This makes it suitable for photographers working outdoors in moderate weather - landscapes, travel, and environmental portraiture in challenging conditions.
Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility: Fixed vs. Interchangeable
One of the most evident differentiators is lens flexibility.
The Samsung TL220 houses a fixed 27-124 mm f/3.5-5.9 zoom, providing convenience but limiting creative scope. The lens gives decent sharpness, but aperture range and zoom reach fall short of enthusiast expectations.
In stark contrast, the Sigma SD1 Merrill uses the Sigma SA mount, with a solid lineup of 76 compatible lenses (both primes and zooms), including macro, telephoto, and wide-angle options - though with less third-party support compared to Canon or Nikon mounts. This vast lens selection empowers photographers to tailor their setups precisely, from portraits requiring creamy bokeh to wildlife photography needing long reach.
Lens quality varies, but Sigma’s Art series lenses tightly paired with the Merrill sensor yield excellent image quality.
Burst Rate and Continuous Shooting: Can They Keep Up?
If we consider action photography, frame rates and buffer depth matter.
The Samsung TL220 does not advertise continuous shooting modes in a significant way, meaning it’s unsuitable for sports or wildlife action bursts. Its main strength lies in casual snapshots.
The Sigma SD1 Merrill similarly lacks a robust continuous shooting system, delivering single shots or very limited burst speeds, making it ill-suited for fast sports or wildlife photography requiring multi-frame tracking.
Versatility Across Photography Genres
Let’s put these cameras to the test across popular photography disciplines:
Portraiture
- Samsung TL220: Limited depth of field control due to small sensor and slow lens, no eye or face detection autofocus. Bokeh is modest. Skin tones appear average with some warmth.
- Sigma SD1 Merrill: Excellent skin tone rendition leveraging Foveon’s color accuracy. Manual focus mastery and aperture flexibility permit exquisite bokeh, particularly with Sigma Art primes. No face detection, but excellent color gradation elevates portraits.
Landscape
- Samsung TL220: 12MP resolution is adequate for web and small prints. Dynamic range falls short, so harshly lit scenes suffer shadow clipping.
- Sigma SD1 Merrill: The 15MP Foveon sensor delivers richly detailed, high dynamic range shots ideal for post-processing latitude. Weather sealing aids fieldwork. Sharp, contrasty images benefit from the large sensor.
Wildlife and Sports
- Samsung TL220: Slow autofocus and lack of continuous modes hinder wildlife use; lens reach is limited.
- Sigma SD1 Merrill: No fast burst or autofocus tracking hinders sports and wildlife, but great image quality helps with deliberate shooting and telephoto primes.
Street Photography
- Samsung TL220: Compact and discrete, simple controls - good for casual strolls.
- Sigma SD1 Merrill: Bulky and loud mirror slap make it noticeable - less ideal for candid moments.
Macro
- Samsung TL220: Macro focus down to 5 cm, but manual focus is missing; image control limited.
- Sigma SD1 Merrill: Full manual focus precision with macro lenses, but bulky gear.
Night and Astro
- Samsung TL220: Noise is prevalent at higher ISO, limited manual controls inhibit long exposures.
- Sigma SD1 Merrill: Manual settings and low ISO noise make it suitable for night photography, but the lack of live view complicates composition.
Video Capabilities
- Samsung TL220: Shoots 720p HD video with basic Motion JPEG compression; no mic input or stabilization in video.
- Sigma SD1 Merrill: No video recording.
Travel
- Samsung TL220: Lightweight, pocketable, versatile zoom make it a good travel companion.
- Sigma SD1 Merrill: Weight and bulk plus limited lens restriction reduce travel suitability.
Professional Use
- Samsung TL220: Lacks raw support, manual controls, weather sealing - hinders anything professional.
- Sigma SD1 Merrill: Offers raw image capture, manual focus tools, weather sealing for demanding use but workflow limited by proprietary RAW files and platform niche.
Battery Life and Storage
Battery life data is sparse for both, but anecdotal testing suggests:
- The TL220 uses an SLB-07A rechargeable battery, good for a few hundred shots per charge.
- The SD1 Merrill’s battery stamina is moderate but reliable for pro shoots, supporting CompactFlash cards with UDMA compatibility - important for high throughput and backup.
Connectivity and Wireless Features
Neither camera excels in wireless connectivity - no Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, NFC, or GPS for geotagging. USB 2.0 is common to both for image transfer, but slow by today’s standards.
Price-to-Performance Perspective
-
The Samsung TL220, at approximately $90 street price (new-old stock or used), offers basic capabilities. It’s a strong contender for budget travelers and beginners wanting a simple zoom camera.
-
The Sigma SD1 Merrill commands over $2300, reflecting its rarified technology, build, and image quality. This camera is for serious photographers who appreciate unique sensor technology and are willing to invest in a niche ecosystem.
Above you see side-by-side landscape and portrait samples from both cameras - note the Sigma’s rich tonal gradation and detail versus the TL220’s flatter but serviceable output.
Putting It All Together: Performance Ratings
To visualize overall performance across categories:
And genre-specific analysis:
My Final Thoughts and Recommendations
After extensive hands-on testing, here’s how I’d counsel prospective buyers:
-
The Samsung TL220 is an affordable, lightweight compact camera perfect for casual photographers, travelers, or beginners who want simplicity and pocket portability. Its limitations in sensor size, manual control, and autofocus mean it’s not suited for demanding photographic work, but for snapshots and easy travel photography, it hits the mark.
-
The Sigma SD1 Merrill is a specialized tool that rewards serious photographers who prioritize ultimate image quality, color accuracy, and weather-sealed durability over speed or convenience. If you shoot portraits, landscapes, studio work, or fine art photography and prefer manual focus and camera control, the SD1 will reward your investment. However, its bulk, sluggish autofocus, and lack of video leave it behind mainstream DSLRs and mirrorless systems in versatility.
If you want to start with a simple ‘good-enough’ camera, go with the TL220. If you want a unique, high-quality imaging experience and can commit to its learning curve and ecosystem, the SD1 Merrill stands as an exceptional albeit niche choice.
In this comparison, we face two fundamentally different photographic philosophies embodied in these cameras - the democratizing, grab-and-go TL220 versus the intentional, craft-driven SD1 Merrill. Both have their place, and I hope this detailed exploration helps you find where your place lies.
Happy shooting!
Samsung TL220 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Specifications
Samsung TL220 | Sigma SD1 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Samsung | Sigma |
Model | Samsung TL220 | Sigma SD1 Merrill |
Also referred to as | ST500 | - |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
Revealed | 2009-08-13 | 2012-04-10 |
Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Dual True II |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 15 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4800 x 3200 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens focal range | 27-124mm (4.6x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 76 |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 96% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | - |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.40 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync, Manual | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 169 gr (0.37 lb) | 790 gr (1.74 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 100 x 60 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") | 146 x 113 x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | SLB-07A | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, internal | Compact Flash (Type I, UDMA compatible) |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $90 | $2,339 |