Samsung TL240 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
82 Imaging
56 Features
30 Overall
45
Samsung TL240 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Bump to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Launched January 2010
- Alternative Name is ST5000
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- ()mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 64mm
- Released February 2012
- New Model is Sigma DP2 Merrill
Samsung TL240 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Overview
Let's look a bit more in depth at the Samsung TL240 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Samsung and Sigma. The sensor resolution of the TL240 (14MP) and the DP1 Merrill (15MP) is relatively close but the TL240 (1/2.3") and DP1 Merrill (APS-C) use different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe TL240 was revealed 3 years prior to the DP1 Merrill and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Samsung TL240 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma DP1 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the TL240 scores against the DP1 Merrill with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung TL240 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung TL240 and Sigma DP1 Merrill. The full galleries are available at Samsung TL240 Gallery and Sigma DP1 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung TL240 over the Sigma DP1 Merrill
TL240 | DP1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3.5" | " | Bigger screen (+3.5") | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP1 Merrill over the Samsung TL240
DP1 Merrill | TL240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2012 | January 2010 | More recent by 25 months | |
Manual focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung TL240 and Sigma DP1 Merrill
TL240 | DP1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen |
Samsung TL240 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera frequently, you need to factor its weight and measurements. The Samsung TL240 offers outer measurements of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Sigma DP1 Merrill has proportions of 122mm x 67mm x 64mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.5") with a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
Check out the Samsung TL240 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the TL240 versus the DP1 Merrill.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TL240 and DP1 Merrill is 95 and 82 respectively.
Samsung TL240 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's hard to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements just by looking through technical specs. The visual here will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the TL240 and DP1 Merrill.
As you can tell, both cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The TL240 with its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF trickier and the Sigma DP1 Merrill will provide you with extra detail because of its extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The older TL240 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Samsung TL240 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung TL240 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Specifications
Samsung TL240 | Sigma DP1 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Samsung | Sigma |
Model | Samsung TL240 | Sigma DP1 Merrill |
Also referred to as | ST5000 | - |
Category | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2010-01-06 | 2012-02-08 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Dual TRUE II engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 15 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Full resolution | 4334 x 3256 | 4704 x 3136 |
Max native ISO | 4800 | 6400 |
Max boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 31-217mm (7.0x) | () |
Maximal aperture | f/3.3-5.5 | f/2.8 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3.5 inch | - |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | - |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1500 secs | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) | 640 x 480 |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 160g (0.35 lbs) | 330g (0.73 lbs) |
Dimensions | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 122 x 67 x 64mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | SLB-11A | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal | - |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $171 | $1,250 |