Clicky

Samsung TL240 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill

Portability
95
Imaging
37
Features
32
Overall
35
Samsung TL240 front
 
Sigma DP1 Merrill front
Portability
82
Imaging
56
Features
30
Overall
45

Samsung TL240 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Key Specs

Samsung TL240
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 4800 (Bump to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
  • 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
  • Launched January 2010
  • Alternative Name is ST5000
Sigma DP1 Merrill
(Full Review)
  • 15MP - APS-C Sensor
  • " Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • 640 x 480 video
  • ()mm (F2.8) lens
  • 330g - 122 x 67 x 64mm
  • Released February 2012
  • New Model is Sigma DP2 Merrill
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Samsung TL240 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Overview

Let's look a bit more in depth at the Samsung TL240 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Samsung and Sigma. The sensor resolution of the TL240 (14MP) and the DP1 Merrill (15MP) is relatively close but the TL240 (1/2.3") and DP1 Merrill (APS-C) use different sensor size.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The TL240 was revealed 3 years prior to the DP1 Merrill and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Samsung TL240 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma DP1 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before getting straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the TL240 scores against the DP1 Merrill with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Samsung TL240 over the Sigma DP1 Merrill

 TL240 DP1 Merrill 
Screen sizing3.5""Bigger screen (+3.5")
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Sigma DP1 Merrill over the Samsung TL240

 DP1 Merrill TL240 
ReleasedFebruary 2012January 2010More recent by 25 months
Manual focus Very accurate focus
Screen resolution920k230kCrisper screen (+690k dot)

Common features in the Samsung TL240 and Sigma DP1 Merrill

 TL240 DP1 Merrill 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen

Samsung TL240 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Physical Comparison

For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera frequently, you need to factor its weight and measurements. The Samsung TL240 offers outer measurements of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Sigma DP1 Merrill has proportions of 122mm x 67mm x 64mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.5") with a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).

Check out the Samsung TL240 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the TL240 versus the DP1 Merrill.

Samsung TL240 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TL240 and DP1 Merrill is 95 and 82 respectively.

Samsung TL240 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill top view buttons comparison

Samsung TL240 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Sensor Comparison

Normally, it's hard to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements just by looking through technical specs. The visual here will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the TL240 and DP1 Merrill.

As you can tell, both cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The TL240 with its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF trickier and the Sigma DP1 Merrill will provide you with extra detail because of its extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The older TL240 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.

Samsung TL240 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill sensor size comparison

Samsung TL240 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung TL240 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Samsung TL240 Portrait photography details
Sigma DP1 Merrill Portrait photography details
28
megapixel count decent (14MP)
lack of manual focus
lack of manual exposure
can't use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
73
focusing manually
decent megapixels (15 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Samsung TL240 Street photography information
Sigma DP1 Merrill Street photography information
60
built in image stabilization (Optical)
features focus by touch
no articulating screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
more heavy than average in class (160 grams)
64
decent sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Samsung TL240 Sports photography features
Sigma DP1 Merrill Sports photography features
43
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (14MP)
has tracking autofocus
no shutter priority
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
48
decent megapixels (15 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
can't change focal length (()mm)
does not have image stabilization
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Samsung TL240 Travel photography information
Sigma DP1 Merrill Travel photography information
60
features focus by touch
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
doesn't have Timelapse mode
more heavy than average in class (160 grams)
screen isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not good (31mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
54
decent megapixels (15 megapixels)
missing Timelapse mode
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Samsung TL240 as a Landscape photography camera
Sigma DP1 Merrill as a Landscape photography camera
37
bigger than average screen (3.5 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (31mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
lack of manual exposure
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
doesn't have Timelapse mode
50
focusing manually
decent megapixels (15 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (()mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
screen is small ( inches)
does not have image stabilization
missing Timelapse mode
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung TL240 Vlogging advice
Sigma DP1 Merrill Vlogging advice
27
touchscreen functionality
built in image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not good (31mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have external microphone port
more heavy than average in class (160g)
22
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 resolution)
missing external microphone jack
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Samsung TL240 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung TL240 and Sigma DP1 Merrill
 Samsung TL240Sigma DP1 Merrill
General Information
Manufacturer Samsung Sigma
Model Samsung TL240 Sigma DP1 Merrill
Also referred to as ST5000 -
Category Ultracompact Large Sensor Compact
Launched 2010-01-06 2012-02-08
Body design Ultracompact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Chip - Dual TRUE II engine
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 24 x 16mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 384.0mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 15 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Full resolution 4334 x 3256 4704 x 3136
Max native ISO 4800 6400
Max boosted ISO 6400 -
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 31-217mm (7.0x) ()
Maximal aperture f/3.3-5.5 f/2.8
Macro focus range 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3.5 inch -
Resolution of screen 230k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8 secs -
Maximum shutter speed 1/1500 secs -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 5.00 m no built-in flash
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync no built-in flash
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) 640 x 480
Max video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 160g (0.35 lbs) 330g (0.73 lbs)
Dimensions 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") 122 x 67 x 64mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.5")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model SLB-11A -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) -
Time lapse feature
Type of storage MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal -
Storage slots 1 1
Launch cost $171 $1,250