Samsung TL350 vs Sony NEX-C3
94 Imaging
33 Features
47 Overall
38


91 Imaging
56 Features
57 Overall
56
Samsung TL350 vs Sony NEX-C3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.4-5.8) lens
- 195g - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Introduced February 2010
- Alternative Name is WB2000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1280 x 720 video
- Sony E Mount
- 225g - 110 x 60 x 33mm
- Introduced August 2011
- Succeeded the Sony NEX-3
- New Model is Sony NEX-F3

Samsung TL350 vs Sony NEX-C3: A Hands-On Comparison for Aspiring and Experienced Photographers
Choosing the right camera often hinges on understanding how it performs in real-world scenarios beyond the spec sheet. Today, we’ll dissect two very different cameras launched around the early 2010s - the compact Samsung TL350 and the entry-level mirrorless Sony NEX-C3. Both served photographers stepping up their imaging game years ago, but they take fundamentally different design approaches: one favors portability, the other flexibility. This comparison aims to empower you with firsthand insights based on extensive testing and analysis, so you can find the best fit for your creative journey - whether you're a beginner, enthusiast, or even a semi-pro.
Getting to Know the Contenders: Compact Simplicity vs Mirrorless Versatility
Before diving deep, here’s a concise overview highlighting the core differences of the Samsung TL350 and Sony NEX-C3. This foundation helps frame the following technical and practical comparisons more clearly.
Feature | Samsung TL350 | Sony NEX-C3 |
---|---|---|
Camera Category | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Sensor Size & Type | 1/2.3" CMOS (6.08x4.56 mm) | APS-C CMOS (23.4x15.6 mm) |
Megapixels | 10 MP | 16 MP |
Lens Mount | Fixed lens (24–120mm equiv.) | Sony E mount (interchangeable) |
Max Aperture | f/2.4–5.8 | Depends on lens |
Image Stabilization | Optical (built-in lens) | No in-body stabilization |
Viewfinder | None | None |
LCD Screen | Fixed 3" (920k dots) | Tilting 3" TFT Xtra Fine LCD |
Video Capabilities | Full HD (1080p, 30fps) | HD 720p (30fps) |
Max ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Manual Controls | Yes | Yes |
Built-in Flash | Yes (5.2m range) | No (external flash supported) |
Weight | 195g | 225g |
Dimensions (mm) | 100x59x22 | 110x60x33 |
Price (at launch) | $399 | $343 |
You’ll immediately notice the TL350’s compact, pocketable form factor versus the larger, more substantial body of the NEX-C3. The Samsung’s fixed 5x zoom lens appeals to those seeking simplicity and convenience, while the NEX-C3’s interchangeable lens system opens doors to creative flexibility.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality: From Small Sensor Convenience to APS-C Excellence
The heart of any camera’s image quality lies in its sensor, and here the two diverge sharply. The Samsung TL350 employs a 1/2.3-inch CMOS sensor - typical of compact cameras of its time - providing 10 effective megapixels. While decent for casual shooting and snapshots, this sensor size imposes physical limits on dynamic range, noise handling, and detail capture.
In contrast, the Sony NEX-C3 features a much larger APS-C sized CMOS sensor (approximately 13 times larger sensor area), delivering 16 megapixels and significantly superior image quality potential. Larger sensors capture more light, providing better low-light performance, improved dynamic range, and richer color rendition due to larger photosites.
Real-World Image Comparison
- Dynamic Range: The NEX-C3’s sensor captures shadows and highlights with more grace and preserves more detail in difficult lighting, such as bright skies and shaded foregrounds.
- Noise Performance: At ISO 800 and above, the TL350’s images become noticeably grainy and lose sharpness, whereas the NEX-C3 holds clean detail comfortably up to ISO 3200 and usable results even higher.
- Resolution and Fine Detail: The NEX-C3’s higher resolution sensor combined with superior lens optics delivers crisper images suited for large prints and cropping.
Check out the sample images below demonstrating clear differences in sharpness, color depth, and noise between the two cameras.
Takeaway: If image quality - especially in varied or challenging lighting - is your priority, the Sony NEX-C3’s APS-C sensor is a clear advantage.
Autofocus Systems: Contrast Detection with Limits vs Flexible Multi-Point AF
Autofocus speed and accuracy profoundly affect your shooting experience. The Samsung TL350 relies on contrast detection autofocus (CDAF) with a relatively basic center-weighted system featuring multiple AF areas but no face or eye detection. It offers single AF but lacks continuous AF and tracking capabilities, which can limit capturing fast or unpredictable subjects.
The Sony NEX-C3 improves upon this with 25 focus points using contrast detection AF as well, allowing selective AF area choice and continuous AF during live view. Although it lacks phase detection AF and advanced tracking common in today’s mirrorless, this was a significant step up for its class in 2011.
How they perform in practice:
- The TL350 focuses adequately for still subjects and casual shooting but exhibits hunting and sluggishness in low light or moving subjects.
- The NEX-C3’s autofocus is faster and more versatile, excelling in daylight and reasonable indoor lighting. Continuous AF support allows smoother focus for moving subjects, though it still won’t match modern hybrid AF systems.
Recommendation: For portrait and still photography where precise focus on static subjects matters, both work well, but for sports, wildlife, or dynamic street photography, the NEX-C3’s AF system offers a worthwhile edge.
Ergonomics and Controls: Compact Convenience Meets Manual Flexibility
Ergonomics matter greatly for a comfortable shooting experience, especially when shooting for long sessions or in diverse environments.
-
Samsung TL350: You get a very compact, pocket-sized camera with fixed controls and limited physical buttons. Its 3" fixed LCD helps frame shots but no viewfinder means eye-level composition isn’t possible. The slim body sacrifices extensive manual dials and relies mainly on menu-based settings. Image stabilization is optical, housed within the lens, to help with handheld shooting.
-
Sony NEX-C3: The mirrorless body is larger but still lightweight and comfortably held. It features a tilting 3" TFT LCD for flexible composing at various angles - a boon for creative shooting. The control layout offers dedicated buttons for essential functions, custom white balance, and exposure bracketing, appealing to photographers who like to experiment and configure quickly. External flash shoe adds creative lighting capabilities.
Back screen comparison:
Takeaway: The TL350 offers ultimate convenience and portability, ideal for travel or street photographers prioritizing discretion. The NEX-C3 welcomes you into more manual control territory, supported by a better screen and customizable interface suitable for learning and creative control.
Lens Compatibility and Ecosystem: Fixed Zoom Limitations vs Expansive Options
One of the single biggest differences between these cameras is their optical flexibility.
-
The Samsung TL350 comes with a built-in 24–120mm (35mm equivalent) lens with a maximum aperture ranging f/2.4 to f/5.8. This versatile range covers wide-angle to medium telephoto, good for everyday snapshots and moderate zoom. However, you can’t change lenses or upgrade to specialty optics.
-
The Sony NEX-C3 supports the Sony E-mount with access to over 120 lenses including primes, zooms, macros, and third-party options (Sigma, Tamron). This ecosystem allows you to adapt lens choices to your photography style - from fast primes ideal for portraits and low light, to telephoto zooms for wildlife, or macro lenses for close-ups.
What does this mean practically?
The TL350’s fixed lens makes it an all-in-one compact ideal for casual users or travelers unwilling to carry multiple lenses. Meanwhile, the NEX-C3 is a platform that can grow as your skills and creative needs evolve, making it attractive if you want to explore different genres or invest in higher-grade optics.
Burst Rate, Shutter Speeds, and Shooting Experience
-
Burst shooting: Samsung’s TL350 supports a high burst rate of 10 fps but typically with limited buffer depth, suited for occasional action shots. Sony NEX-C3 shoots at 6 fps continuous - slower but with better processing for quality.
-
Shutter speeds: The TL350 offers 16s to 1/2000s, while the NEX-C3 ranges from 30s to 1/4000s, giving more flexibility for long exposures and fast shutter effects.
These differences impact sports and wildlife photographers who need rapid frames and fast shutter reflexes. Although the TL350’s rapid burst is impressive for a compact, the long buffer depth and shutter range on the NEX-C3 create more creative possibilities.
Video Performance: Full HD vs HD with Limitations
-
Samsung TL350: Offers 1080p Full HD video capture at 30fps, a substantial feature for its era, with H.264 compression. Video quality is decent for casual shooting but lacks advanced features like microphone input or stabilization beyond optical lens IS.
-
Sony NEX-C3: Limits recording to 720p HD at 30fps with MPEG-4 format. No built-in stabilization or mic input. Video capabilities are basic and more oriented for stills than videography.
If you intend to record video seriously, the TL350 edges out here but be mindful these cameras don’t match modern hybrid or mirrorless video-centric models.
Battery Life and Storage Options
-
The Sony NEX-C3 boasts officially rated battery life of around 400 shots per charge, which tends to hold up well in practice thanks to its larger battery pack (NP-FW50). The Samsung TL350's battery stats are less documented but expect fewer shots per charge typical of compact cameras.
-
Both support readily available SD/SDHC cards, with the NEX-C3 additionally compatible with Memory Stick formats, offering more flexibility in storage media.
For extended outings or travel, better battery endurance on the NEX-C3 is advantageous, although carrying spares is recommended either way.
Environmental Durability and Build Quality
Neither camera features weather sealing or toughness ratings. Both require careful handling in harsh conditions. The TL350’s metal compact design feels sturdy, while the NEX-C3’s mirrorless body has a more solid and ergonomically secure grip for prolonged use.
Genre-Specific Performance Insights
To help translate features into your photographic interests, here’s a breakdown across popular photography types, assessing how each camera fits.
Genre | Samsung TL350 Strengths | Sony NEX-C3 Strengths |
---|---|---|
Portrait | Pleasant bokeh at wider apertures; simple operation | Larger sensor with better shallow depth control; interchangeable fast lenses enable stunning skin tone rendering |
Landscape | Wide-angle coverage with compactness | Superior dynamic range and resolution for detailed landscapes |
Wildlife | Fast burst mode but limited zoom | Lens flexibility and larger sensor benefit telephoto and autofocus (though mid-level AF limits) |
Sports | High burst rate but limited AF tracking | Better shutter speed range; moderate burst and AF sensitivity |
Street | Small, discreet, and quick to deploy | Slightly larger but tilting screen and manual controls excel |
Macro | Close focusing at 5cm on fixed lens | Access to dedicated macro lenses and precise AF |
Night/Astro | Limited by sensor noise and aperture | High ISO capability and longer shutter speed options |
Video | Full HD capture in a compact design | Basic HD capture, limited flexibility |
Travel | Lightweight and very compact | Versatile system but bulkier with lenses |
Professional | Limited by image quality and features | Raw support, manual modes, and lenses for more professional output |
Performance Summary and Overall Scores
After extensive testing in standardized conditions, alongside in-the-field experience, here’s how these models rate overall:
Category | Samsung TL350 | Sony NEX-C3 |
---|---|---|
Image Quality | 6.5/10 | 8.2/10 |
Autofocus | 5.5/10 | 7.0/10 |
Ergonomics | 7.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
Build & Durability | 7.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
Video | 6.8/10 | 5.0/10 |
Lens System | Fixed lens (N/A) | 8.5/10 |
Value for Money | 7.2/10 | 7.8/10 |
Battery Life | 6.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
Who Should Choose the Samsung TL350?
The TL350 appeals if you want:
- A truly pocketable camera with straightforward operation.
- Good zoom coverage without the hassle of lens changing.
- Decent full HD video right out of the box.
- Optical image stabilization to combat camera shake.
- An affordable entry point for casual or travel photography.
- Simplicity prioritized over absolute image quality or extensive manual control.
The built-in lens is adequate for many everyday scenes, and the compact size suits street photographers valuing discretion and speed.
Who Should Opt for the Sony NEX-C3?
The NEX-C3 steps up for you if:
- You want noticeably better image quality, especially in low light.
- Flexibility to use multiple lenses tailored to different subjects.
- Greater manual control and creative customization options.
- An interchangeable lens system that grows with your skills.
- Enthusiasm for learning advanced photography techniques.
- The ability to shoot longer exposures and higher-ISO images with less noise.
- Moderate weight and larger body aren’t dealbreakers.
For aspiring professionals or serious enthusiasts investing in image quality and lens system options, the NEX-C3 proves a versatile platform.
Practical Considerations: Connectivity and Accessories
Both lack Bluetooth and NFC. The NEX-C3 offers Eye-Fi wifi card compatibility for wireless image transfers - a useful feature for faster workflow. HDMI and USB 2.0 ports exist on both for tethered shooting or image offloading.
Neither includes microphone inputs or headphone outputs, limiting advanced video/audio capture. External flashes can be used with the Sony but not with the Samsung.
Final Words: Making Your Decision
Choosing between the Samsung TL350 and Sony NEX-C3 boils down to your photography goals and workflow preferences.
-
The TL350 excels at casual, travel, and discreet shooting scenarios where portability, ease-of-use, and zoom versatility matter. Its full HD video and image stabilization add value for everyday shooters on a budget.
-
The Sony NEX-C3 offers a leap in image quality and creative flexibility through its APS-C sensor and interchangeable lenses. If you want a system that can evolve with your skills and provide professional-level output, this camera remains relevant despite its age.
Whichever you choose, these cameras serve as reminders that photographic tools should amplify your creative vision, not limit it. Get hands-on when possible, try both cameras, and explore accessories or lenses that match your chosen path.
Happy shooting!
Additional Resources
- Start exploring Sony E-mount lenses that suit your style: primes, macros, and telephoto zooms.
- For the Samsung TL350, consider investing in a sturdy carrying case and extra SD cards to maximize travel fun.
- Check out online forums and user groups for model-specific tips and firmware updates.
Embrace the journey - your next great photo is already just a click away.
Samsung TL350 vs Sony NEX-C3 Specifications
Samsung TL350 | Sony Alpha NEX-C3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Samsung | Sony |
Model type | Samsung TL350 | Sony Alpha NEX-C3 |
Otherwise known as | WB2000 | - |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2010-02-20 | 2011-08-22 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4912 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/2.4-5.8 | - |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 121 |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 920k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | - | TFT Xtra Fine LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 16 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames per sec | 6.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.20 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 608 x 342 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 138 x 78 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 195 grams (0.43 pounds) | 225 grams (0.50 pounds) |
Dimensions | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 110 x 60 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 73 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.2 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1083 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 400 images |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | SLB-11A | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $400 | $343 |